А. Осташко: Будь хеттом! » Адыги – История, культура, традиции и быт адыгов (черкесов)

А. Осташко: Будь хеттом! » Адыги – История, культура, традиции и быт адыгов (черкесов).

May 1, 2013, Category – Articles » History

Favorites
A. Ostashko: Any Hattie!
A. Ostashko: Any Hattie!
Related photos
We offer you a very interesting article by Ukrainian historian Andrew Ostashko “Het zhegyIe! – Whether Hett! or the Hittites are still there, ” “God can not change the past, but historians can. And should be, just because they sometimes provide this service, God tolerates their existence …. ” Samuel Butler’s history – the word, which has several meanings.The first – “what happened.” And the second – “the science that studies and describes what it was.” Very often it happens that describes the history of science that was inaccurate, often misunderstood and distorted – errs, errs, is a captive of their established patterns and concepts. Mistakes happen intentionally and unintentionally, accidentally and intentionally. Like any science, history likes to make discoveries at its disposal interesting facts. Scientists themselves – are also people, and nothing human is alien to them. After making the discovery – that recognition, fame and career. But with all this science of history remains inert and conservative, with great difficulty accepting new attitudes and new approaches to old problems. Why? The fact is that any current concept of the power of science – is the fruit of the labor of some of the outstanding scientist, authority in this area of expertise. Someone dared to revise his opinion, must complete at least years – 40-50 after the death of that luminary of science. And then someone will say that this scientist was wrong, or say that this concept should be reviewed. We can say that historical science is slowly “goes” on the “authorities” that her train slowly creeping up the hill. There is another reason for the slowness and conservatism. The fact that many scientists have made ​​their careers by now well-established concepts and move them virtually impossible. To this can be added the fact that the state formation, religious and political organizations as well as national and nationalist, practicing or promoting a certain ideology, are contributing to the “noble cause” rewriting history. Thus, the line up “favorable” and “digestible” versions of historical concepts. All of this ultimately gives biased science. discovering something new, science proceeds as follows – look, fit this new fact in the current orderly scheme, the “right” ideology and politics. If the fit – great! You can congratulate the opening of confirming the discovery of the past.And if you can not understand or, even worse for the discoverer, – destroys the existing opinion? Then leave while unattended and push in the “back burner” until better times. One such amazing and indigestible to the facts of science is a phrase that exists among the Circassians as a figure of speech, such as sustainable phrase: “Het zhegyIe!”, which translated into Russian means – “Be Hett». A detailed interpretation of the meaning: “Behave yourself so that you talked about: he – Hittite.” This phrase is also hidden emotional appeal “to multiply and continue the glory of the Hittites!”. This phrase is now actively used in everyday speech, the Circassians, it is – the current live the phrase used by the people.Usually it says senior years younger naputstvuya or instructing. For example, watching the road, in the army, to school, to the competition. should also pay attention to the fact that in the phrase, “Be Hett!” no value or meaning, which would be expressed in the phrase, “Be like or similar Hetty” or same “imitate Hetty.” It calls not to try to be like the Hittite, and it is not to forget that you Hittite. That is the kind of person who utters this expression, considers himself and the person to whom it is said – the Hittites. On this basis, it is clear and understandable, that we are dealing with the archaic self-designation of the Circassians. This is evidenced by the common sense, because it is logical, for example, that the Russian might say to his younger – “Do not forget that you are Russian,” but unlikely to say – “Do not forget that you are a Pole!”. The Chinese say this: “whether the Chinese!” But in any case will not call his younger-be Japanese. Circassians consider themselves Hittites called themselves the Hittites, and in this capacious phrase tremendous emotional content – the pride of ethnic belonging and pride historical. In this phrase, apart from the direct sense, founded and still call – and continue to increase the glory of the Hittites. And that’s what the Circassians consider themselves Hittites and call themselves by the Hittites, a problem with the official historical version. Where geographically Hittites, and where the Circassians? At what time of the Hittites lived, and when there were Circassians? What do they overlap? So can ask us questions scientists hettologi. And then do they say, “The Circassians Hittites can not be!”. Because none of the discoverers of the Hittites, whose works are the basis of knowledge of this ancient people were not aware of the phrase “Het zhegyIe,” and still occuring at the Circassians. Hettologiya otherwise probably would have gone a different way. It turns out this discrepancy, this little phrase, being taken into account, can change the existing concept and give rise to completely revise the Hittite perspective! Now, in the current concept of a single thread linking the Circassians and the Hittite power, is the thesis that the language of the inhabitants of pre-Indo-Malaya Asia – Hutt similar in structure and vocabulary of the languages ​​of the Abkhaz-Adyghe (Circassian, Ubykh, Abaza, Abkhaz). But this “thin thread” science is not interested and does not develop it. Let us now take some scientific texts and identify them on the Hittites, and subject the thing in question. Let’s start with the big terminological confusion that exists regarding the Hittites. This confusion is one of the main reasons as to who the Hittites.
So: 1. Hittites science calls the people who spoke an Indo-European language, which appeared from nowhere in the Land of Hatti. He gradually over several centuries colonized the country and became co-exist with the local indigenous population – the Hutts. 2. Hittites science also refers to the people, formed as a result of a long cohabitation and mixing with the local Indo-European aliens aboriginal population – not Indo Hutts. In general, the Hittites called all the inhabitants of the Hittite state. 3. Hittites called the people who lived in small kingdoms – the ruins of the once-powerful Hittite power scattered throughout Anatolia after the fall of the empire. 4. “Protohettami” science calls the people who lived in Asia Minor before the Indo-Europeans began to appear there. Self-designation of the indigenous population were the Hittites and Hatti, – depending on the dialect pronunciation. And they came to the land called Indo-Europeans themselves – nesity. Also in science says that “protohetty” had a mature civilization at the time of occurrence of the first nesitov. Between the “Hittites”-Indo-Europeans and “protohettami” – there is no genetic or ethnic ties, although the term “proto-” implies it. 5. The Bible calls the Hittites, heteyanami, Hittites all the people mentioned in the above paragraphs. Actually thanks to this book all the first time and learned about the existence of Hittite power in ancient times. 6. In ordinary consciousness of those who have heard at least something about the Hittites, and to popularize the representation deliberately primitivized modern scientific exposition, the Hittites – is the first in the history of Indo-Europeans who conquered Asia Minor and prevailed in those lands. They are pioneers in the iron and competitors of ancient Egypt, who built a great civilization. contradictions hidden in terminology and the terminology is the basis of the proper filing of the information. Terminology – a conditional language, and if there are contradictions, in the knowledge there is confusion. With regard to our definition, if the information in paragraph 1 to take the number as correct or true definition of the term, the information in paragraph number 2 and number 3 – turns out not true, not accurate. If we assume that the correct information set out in paragraph number 2, we now have other items in error. In any case, the term – “protohetty” specified in paragraph number 4, is initially not true – it is not competent definition. You can not use a prefix – “proto-” where there is no consistent genetic and ethnic ties. Due to this whole mess, and formed a scientific statement contained in paragraph number 6 – primitivized and popularized the concept of the Hittites. That’s one of the samples of such notions: “But the Hittites continued to ask riddles. And the chief was yet to come – in fact Hittite was an Indo-European language! This entailed another problem: the means and the people were Indo-European … “(Volkov, N. Forgetful.” Hittites. Unknown empire in Asia Minor “). As can be countered this mess and rather primitive ideas? That in addition to the phrase “Het zhegyIe!”, There is still the Circassians? And there is still much that is stored in the traditions of the Circassian people in the songs, in language, rituals, knowledge about ourselves. Scientific expedition to collect vintage songs Circassians in the 30 years of the twentieth century, has found the song on bzhedugskom dialect Circassians. We present here the lyrics translated into the Russian language: “The Hittites our grandfathers, the ancient tribe are, legendary belief. Hittite kingdom great for large sea lies, becoming famous, is expanding. His border to Egypt brought the Hittites, Ramses – King of Egypt Unhappy with this war begins. The Hittites their knowledge in all aspects of bringing governor of Egypt – Pharaoh Ramses comes to the Hittites, the Agreement concluded together. Both sides were related … ” As they say – no comment … There are examples of linguistic and Abkhaz language, which are related to the Circassian. In the vernacular of the Abkhaz There is one very interesting expression. When the Abkhaz want to say the phrase, “Mother Tongue”, he says: “A-Ha Tay byzshaa”, which literally translated into Russian, as: – “Hutt language.” In addition, all of the Circassian dialects to ask the man – “who are you?”, You say, ‘ue uhet? “, Which literally translated -” you Hittite? “That is, in the semantic meaning:” you own? ” “You is ours.” At the Circassians and today are fairly common names with the root “huts”, which are conserved Hittite past – Khatko (Hetykue) Hatyzh (Hetyzh) Atazhukin (Hetezhykue), as well as the names – Hetu, Hete, Hetyze etc.; also one of the Circassian Peoples called – hatukaytsy. All this is knowledge of the Circassian people of its glorious past, of itself, so they are closer to the truth to common sense. Are robust and scientists such statements: “On the other side of science are also established undeniable traits of kinship of the Caucasian languages ​​with some now dead languages ​​of the Near East, in particular protohettskih language. This last, as it turns out, is particularly close to the Abkhaz-Adyghe languages, in particular Ubykh. ” Talking about the relationship “protohettskih” language with Adyghe-Abkhaz GAMelikishvili G. writes: “The use of prefixes as morphological elements, as well as many other effects of morphological structure of the language actually brings him to the highlanders Caucasian languages ​​(Ubykh, Circassian, Abazinian). ST Eremyan also classifies ancient Abkhazian-Circassian tribes to protohettskih ethnic world. ” According to the famous Russian author Alexander aces, “protohetty” Hatta and historical Atlanteans – they are different names for one and the same people. The author writes: “So, defined the location of Atlantis – a real country Dardanovogo killed in the flood. Inhabited this country highly developed nation – Atlanta, more Hutts, protohetty. Atlantean culture has had a huge impact on the culture of the surrounding nations, including the Slav. “. need to pay attention to the following. As described above, and Science and the Bible, and the usual popularized the view is called the Hittites different “subjects”, thereby contradicting one another. And they do not know for certain which of these “entities” referred to himself as the Hittites. On the other side of the Circassians Hittites no one calls, but they call themselves, and see themselves as descendants of the ancient people of this particular. Why there was such confusion in terms of why the Indo-European component of the knowledge of the Hittites came to the fore, and “protohettskih” component remains in the shade and accordingly the value of the Circassians and their knowledge of it are invisible, and even unknown to science? After all, no doubt, and it shows, as they say, to the naked eye, that the knowledge of the Hittites, as well as their own country and their history is made ​​up of two components – neindoevropeyskoy and Indo-European. first cause confusion and the fact that, in modern terms, an Indo-European component has a greater “public relations”, that the discoverers of the Hittites – the Europeans themselves. So that they attach great importance to “own” the Indo-European component – is completely natural. The second reason – it is, of course, is that the very discovery of the civilization of the Hittites, and deciphering texts took place in the late XIX – early XX centuries. – That is, in the heyday – “Indo-European ideas.” Then science behaved like this: find a cart, which once ran past the so-called “Indo-European” and immediately Science stated: “This is our cart!”, Thus, never noticing that in the cart, then sat two Africans. .. Science, which itself is Indo-European, by definition, opening the Hittites, Indo-Europeans called them. It was a powerful civilization, a rival of Egypt, the discoverer of iron, and the temptation to call it the first Indo-European civilization was very large. Especially cuneiform tablets were found on a hitherto unknown Indo-European language. So firmly established opinion: the Hittites – this is the first Indo-Europeans, who built a civilization equal to ancient Egypt, and so on … Huttese primordial element has been left in the shadows, although he now lies on the surface, but this topic is now almost do not work out. If you develop it, the Indo-European component will lose a lot.Here are some details that lie on the surface, but in the “shadow”: 1. Prior to Asia Minor began to appear Indo-Europeans – there was already a highly developed civilization, and strangers to it did not add anything significant. We can say that they have come to a ready-made. The fact that came to Asia Minor, Indo-Europeans were below the level of culture – also known. 2. The aliens have not won territory Hatti – for centuries they gradually settled and assimilated among the local population. 3. The pivotal element of culture, and the main control – it is a religion. It has remained the same as before the Indo-European language of the sacred ritual was pre-Indo – Hutt. Even the name of the gods remained Hutt. 4. And the Caucasian country Ashuyya and Maikop culture, and the Hittite empire – all links in a continuous chain. Hittites consider separately – it’s just not seeing the whole historical picture as a whole. After all, Country Hattie was not an island of civilization, and was part of a larger one world along the southern and eastern coast of the Black Sea, albeit with separate centers, but with the kindred tribes. 5. There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans at least somewhat dominated in the Land of Hatti. Either in politics or in culture or in religion, they do not sway. Even the situation is somewhat the opposite. It is known that most of the kings wore Hutt, not Indo-European names. Religion has not changed under the influence of newcomers. And the quote is another fact: “The merger of the Indo-Europeans with native tribes in the Hutt Central Asia Minor formed Hittite ethnic group, who created around the middle of the XVIII century. BC. e. powerful Hittite state, fully embrace the rich cultural traditions of the Hutt “(GG Giorgadze.” Ancient History “, 1989). 6. Hittites called themselves, not Indo-Europeans, and the Hutts – and now continue to call themselves Circassians. However, I might say, why then Hutt language in the Land of Hatti was dead, preserved only in religious texts and rituals, and became the Indo-European language of the proceedings, diplomacy Hetskom tsarstve.I is it really? This question is answered scientist Gordon Childe, in his book “Aryans – the founders of European civilization”: “First of all, the material that we have at our disposal, and this plate from the state archives of Hittite kings in Boghazkoy reflects only the language in which the said the Hittites in Cappadocia, and on this basis it is impossible to draw any conclusions regarding the other “Hittites”, for example, those who lived in Carchemish in northern Syria. Moreover, now it is clear that even in Cappadocia, there was a large number of languages: Pali, Mitanni and protohettskih. On the latter should pay particular attention, as he left behind their own written records. There is no doubt that the “Hittites” can not be attributed to a number of Indo-Europeans. Another thing dialect, which themselves scribes called “our language”, no doubt experienced the Indo-European influence. ” It is a pity of course that Gordon Childe did not know that the Circassians have an expression – “Be Hett!” – this would make it even more convinced in correctness of his conclusions. Sam Hutt language, of course, refers to a group of Adygea abhazzskoy-Caucasian language family, and as complex as the Circassian Ubykh, Abkhazian languages ​​.. Many native language Hutt could move to a simpler Indo-European language, especially in the field of public administration. Similar examples in the history of the Circassians were later – Circassian Mamluk sultans, ruled an empire in Arabic. A modern Circassians in Turkey have moved into Turkish, to both the public and easier language than their mother tongue. Apparently, this happened in the Land of Hatti, where more than a simple Indo-European language has spread rapidly multiethnic empire as more acceptable as an international and local Hutt complex language remained as a spoken language and the sacred. Otherwise, as modern scientists say if hatsky language completely disappeared back in those days, remaining only in religious texts, and became a dead language, then how to have survived the phrase – “Het zhegyIe!”?To answer this question, we need to show the contradictions that exist in science – hettologii. To do this, we present a table in which the left-hand side – well-established scientific or become popular theses (red font), and the right part of the – counter or knowledge of the Circassian people about themselves (blue): 1. The Hittites – Indo-Europeans. 1. Yes, indeed, among the ethnic group, called “Hittites”, was a significant Indo-European com-ponents. Indo-Europeans but they did not call themselves – “Hittite.” This exonym by the name of the country, the inhabitants of which they were, and that existed before them. Hittites called themselves natives – Hatta (“protohetty”). And now in the modern world by the Hittites called themselves Circassians. 2. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, the creators of advanced civilization and powers equal to ancient Egypt. 2. Civilization Hutt existed long before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor. 3.Anitas king – the first king of the Hittites 3. And to Anitas in the Land of Hatti kings were, however, Anitas first king caught in the record which read our contemporaries scientists. It is a mistake to begin with Anitas history of the Hittites. 4. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans – the discoverers of iron. 4. Iron was known Hutts before the Indo-Europeans came to Central Asia Minor. This is indicated by the message of Pharaoh king of Hatti with a request to send him an iron dagger. The message is dated 2000 BC. e. 5. -Indo-European Hittites ruled Asia Minor from 1750 to 1200 years BC 5.There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans were somewhat dominated the rest of the population of the country of Hatti. Rather the reverse: most famous kings wore Hutt names. 6. The Indo-Europeans conquered Asia Minor and established the Empire. 6. In the literature, many times repeated, that the conquest was not, and there was a gradual settlement of the Indo-Europeans in the Land of Hatti, and integration. From the above we can draw the following conclusions: 1. Necessary to create a science Circassian Abhazalogii to live with the position of the fragments of an ancient civilization – Cherkess (Circassians), Ubykhs the Abaza, Abkhaz to reconsider the knowledge of the Hittites, the country Ashuyya, ancient Mesopotamia, the Maikop culture, not separately, but in unity. It also requires knowledge of the languages ​​and dialects of all these Caucasian peoples. 2. The opening of which John Kolaruso reported in 2011 (details in a later chapter), once again confirms that the future Europeans and future Circassians in the past for a long time been in interaction with each other. 3. There is a popular belief about the Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, who created the Hittite power does not hold water. We can only speak Otomi that the country of Hatti, there is some component of the Indo-European. At the same backbone political model – Confederation controlled by a single ruler, and in fact has a socialist system of government – that is nonsense for the Ancient World, remained. 4. The only pieces of Hatti Countries that existed before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor – it’s Circassians and Abkhazians. And for them, “Hittite” – an ancient self. 5. History of the Hittites did not have a gap between the XII and XVIII centuries. BC. e. This is exactly the time when the Europeans future and the future of the Circassians, Abkhazians coexisted within the same public education. It was during this period of time the Europeans borrowed from the future of the future of the Circassians, Abkhaz culture, which became the basis of European civilization, not to mention the genes which, according to the latest findings, in large enough quantities is among the Europeans. 6. History in the case of the Hittites once again shows its bias and clumsiness, and the “authority” prodavlivaya “best” ideas, and being by definition the “Indo-European” – pulls the blanket over himself. Now I want to give an interesting example of the Bible in the Hittite subject. It is the story of perhaps the most famous of the Hittites – Uriah Hettiyanine. This character of the Old Testament was in the list of the best soldiers of the governor of the state of Israel – King David. It tells about 11 head of the 2nd Book of Kings. All who read the Old Testament, remember this story. The act of Uriah the Hittite is completely separate from the other acts and the acts described in the Bible. What is the difference? You might ask. The difference in motivation. Bible is full of stories about the various exploits, deeds, deeds. They are committed in the name of faith, the Lord of kings, women, brothers. There were acts committed because of lust for power, greed, and the other was the cause of meanness, selfishness, etc. There were, of course, act in the name of love and compassion. That is, in each case has its own motive. And Uriah act is fundamentally different from all the others, described in the Old Testament, it was his motivation. Let’s remember how it was. Uriah the Hittite, refuses to go home to sleep with his wife, thereby violating the order of their king – David. David himself so wanted to hide the cause of his wife’s pregnancy Uriah – Bathsheba.Pregnancy, as we learn from the same story, came from the fact that at the time, as long as Uriah was at war, King David’s wife forced him to close and she suffered from it. If Uriah at least one night spent at home, it would be possible to justify pregnancy Beersheba. So King David through cunning attempts to send Uriah home to spend the night. And Uriah refuses to go home at night, although it is an order of the king, and, as we know the word gentleman – the law for his servants. But no, Uriah did not go home and spend the night at the gate of the palace, along with security. He did not comply with an order of the king, and should any of its own internal installation. And this set is stronger than the word of a king, though the king’s word, and the law for his servants. At the very same King David about this setup is not even know, or he would have chosen a different tactical trick against Uriah. Some kind of ethical standard, unknown to King David and the other Israelis, Uriah does not allow to execute the order of the king. Any other warrior in place of Uriah, who came from the war, and who had not seen for a long time my wife would love to obey the order of the king, without even thinking. But not the Hittite. He is the king says, “… and my lord Joab and the servants of my lord are in the field, and I went to his house to eat and drink, and sleep with my wife? I swear by thy life and the life of your soul, I will not do! “This behavior says that Uriah the Hittite is subject to ethical standards that at a later time, known as the Circassians -” zekIue habze “- the unwritten law of marching. It is part of the Circassian ethics – Adyghe Khabza. During the raid, campaign, war, every soldier obeys the “zekIue habze.” The fundamental principle of the law marching sounds like this: “The interests of the group (party, army detachment) is always more important than the interests of any single voina.Ni separately taken warrior can not have any privileges and benefits as opposed to the other before the end of the campaign (war, the raid) . Other important principles of this Code are as follows: “To leave the battlefield for any reason, except for tactical reasons, leaving the other – means to cover their name and shame their children forever” “The commander elected only during the campaign, and only by their personal qualities.” “Commander leaves last battlefield. ” ‘surrender – the biggest disgrace. ” These principles and requirements remained the Circassians in their military culture until the end of the XIX century. And in the understanding of Uriah – to go to bed with his wife at the time, when his combat comrades in the field, it equates to flee from the battlefield. Such an understanding in principle characteristic of Hittite. The only possible way out for himself, he sees – to spend the night with the same soldiers like himself, to the protection of the palace, with soldiers who are directly in the line of military obyazonnostey. Thus, Uriah creates for himself the situation in which he can consider himself not run away from the battlefield. King David was re-invited me Uriah the next day and “eating with him and drank, and he made ​​him drunk.” King hoped that Uriah drunk certainly will spend the night home to his wife. However, it is not, is not, – sleeps with security at the gate of the palace.Even napivshiysya Uriah did not violate its internal charter. It must be emphasized that no one ever would have blamed him if he slept at home. Only his inner principle and military upbringing, his conscience and his judge. It is this military principle, unknown to the Israelis would not allow the will of the king of Uriah. If you say that this is not surprising, such a principle would not only be from the Hittites and the Circassians you would be wrong, because the Jews of this is not known, it is very clear from the biblical story. seems that Uriah repeatedly said senior “Het zhegyIe” – “Be Hett!” – that is, “to multiply the glory of the Hittites!”. And he actually went on and increase in the millennium. Uriah the Hittite – the symbol of this military honor. The honor cost him his life. Uriah name a few times in the history of the Circassians, and probably in the pre-Christian Circassia was quite common. 1. From the ancient inscriptions known – Ware Hetu – full namesake of Uriah the Hittite, of which four thousand years ago wrote an Assyrian king Narasmin. This inscription is carved in stone. Says that of the Western Caucasus thousand years ago came under the leadership of the Hutts Ware Hetu and captured the city of Akkad, and built a city Carchemish and Thapsek. 2. Ueri Dade – the so-called leader Kasogs (ancestors of the Circassians), who fought a duel with the Russian Tmutarakan Prince Mstislav in 1022 in the Russian chronicles the name sounds like – “Rededi.” 3. Ueri Dade – the so-called People’s Court judge, in a story about a wise man Zhabagiev cauldron. Ueri Zhabagiev was the forerunner of the People’s Court. In all cases, except for the story about the judge, the name of Uriah are soldiers – unit commanders. Perhaps this is a military post, or some kind of nickname given to colleagues for military merit, because in Circassian: “Uerra!” – Forward! “Ware” – a war, a war.”Uerubyd” – a prisoner of war. “Uerysh” – Warhorse . “Uerk” – a professional soldier, officer. (The letter “E” in the Circassian language-A short beep) Apparently, the English word – “war” and the Bulgarian – “Thief” – derived from this ancient root .. Wife Uriah the Hittite, which later became the wife of King David and King Solomon’s mother, was called – Bathsheba that twisted like – Bathsheba. “Baie-it-schabe” in the language of the Circassians read: Baie many IT “containing” Schabe, “gentle.” Just-“tender”. As the name for a girl in today’s Circassian world, the name of the organic and reminiscent of the Circassian names such as – NefIytsIe – “black-eyed” Pague – “snub” Naschhue – “gray-eyed”, Schabe – “soft, tender”. The name of her grandfather – Ahithophel. This name contains three Circassian roots: “het” – Hittite, “fe” – appearance, form and “lly” – man. “A” – is common in the Abkhaz-Adyghe language group prefix pointing to a specific object specifying affix. Linguists are trying to translate the name from the Hebrew, the result is – “brother of madness.” Agree, not the most appropriate name for the adviser of King David and indeed the name allogichno for any nation. which has several meanings. The first – “what happened.” And the second – “the science that studies and describes what it was.” Very often it happens that describes the history of science that was inaccurate, often misunderstood and distorted – errs, errs, is a captive of their established patterns and concepts. Mistakes happen intentionally and unintentionally, accidentally and intentionally. Like any science, history likes to make discoveries at its disposal interesting facts. Scientists themselves – are also people, and nothing human is alien to them. After making the discovery – that recognition, fame and career. But with all this science of history remains inert and conservative, with great difficulty accepting new attitudes and new approaches to old problems. Why? The fact is that any current concept of the power of science – is the fruit of the labor of some of the outstanding scientist, authority in this area of expertise.Someone dared to revise his opinion, must complete at least years – 40-50 after the death of that luminary of science.And then someone will say that this scientist was wrong, or say that this concept should be reviewed. We can say that historical science is slowly “goes” on the “authorities” that her train slowly creeping up the hill. There is another reason for the slowness and conservatism. The fact that many scientists have made ​​their careers by now well-established concepts and move them virtually impossible. To this can be added the fact that the state formation, religious and political organizations as well as national and nationalist, practicing or promoting a certain ideology, are contributing to the “noble cause” rewriting history. Thus, the line up “favorable” and “digestible” versions of historical concepts. All of this ultimately gives biased science. discovering something new, science proceeds as follows – look, fit this new fact in the current orderly scheme, the “right” ideology and politics. If the fit – great! You can congratulate the opening of confirming the discovery of the past. And if you can not understand or, even worse for the discoverer, – destroys the existing opinion? Then leave while unattended and push in the “back burner” until better times. One such amazing and indigestible to the facts of science is a phrase that exists among the Circassians as a figure of speech, such as sustainable phrase: “Het zhegyIe!”, which translated into Russian means – “Be Hett». A detailed interpretation of the meaning: “Behave yourself so that you talked about: he – Hittite.” This phrase is also hidden emotional appeal “to multiply and continue the glory of the Hittites!”. This phrase is now actively used in everyday speech, the Circassians, it is – the current live the phrase used by the people. Usually it says senior years younger naputstvuya or instructing. For example, watching the road, in the army, to school, to the competition. should also pay attention to the fact that in the phrase, “Be Hett!” no value or meaning, which would be expressed in the phrase, “Be like or similar Hetty” or same “imitate Hetty.” It calls not to try to be like the Hittite, and it is not to forget that you Hittite. That is the kind of person who utters this expression, considers himself and the person to whom it is said – the Hittites. On this basis, it is clear and understandable, that we are dealing with the archaic self-designation of the Circassians. This is evidenced by the common sense, because it is logical, for example, that the Russian might say to his younger – “Do not forget that you are Russian,” but unlikely to say – “Do not forget that you are a Pole!”. The Chinese say this: “whether the Chinese!” But in any case will not call his younger-be Japanese. Circassians consider themselves Hittites called themselves the Hittites, and in this capacious phrase tremendous emotional content – the pride of ethnic belonging and pride historical.In this phrase, apart from the direct sense, founded and still call – and continue to increase the glory of the Hittites. And that’s what the Circassians consider themselves Hittites and call themselves by the Hittites, a problem with the official historical version. Where geographically Hittites, and where the Circassians? At what time of the Hittites lived, and when there were Circassians? What do they overlap? So can ask us questions scientists hettologi. And then do they say, “The Circassians Hittites can not be!”. Because none of the discoverers of the Hittites, whose works are the basis of knowledge of this ancient people were not aware of the phrase “Het zhegyIe,” and still occuring at the Circassians.Hettologiya otherwise probably would have gone a different way. It turns out this discrepancy, this little phrase, being taken into account, can change the existing concept and give rise to completely revise the Hittite perspective! Now, in the current concept of a single thread linking the Circassians and the Hittite power, is the thesis that the language of the inhabitants of pre-Indo-Malaya Asia – Hutt similar in structure and vocabulary of the languages ​​of the Abkhaz-Adyghe (Circassian, Ubykh, Abaza, Abkhaz). But this “thin thread” science is not interested and does not develop it. Let us now take some scientific texts and identify them on the Hittites, and subject the thing in question. Let’s start with the big terminological confusion that exists regarding the Hittites. This confusion is one of the main reasons as to who the Hittites. So: 1. Hittites science calls the people who spoke an Indo-European language, which appeared from nowhere in the Land of Hatti. He gradually over several centuries colonized the country and became co-exist with the local indigenous population – the Hutts. 2. Hittites science also refers to the people, formed as a result of a long cohabitation and mixing with the local Indo-European aliens aboriginal population – not Indo Hutts. In general, the Hittites called all the inhabitants of the Hittite state. 3. Hittites called the people who lived in small kingdoms – the ruins of the once-powerful Hittite power scattered throughout Anatolia after the fall of the empire. 4. “Protohettami” science calls the people who lived in Asia Minor before the Indo-Europeans began to appear there. Self-designation of the indigenous population were the Hittites and Hatti, – depending on the dialect pronunciation. And they came to the land called Indo-Europeans themselves – nesity. Also in science says that “protohetty” had a mature civilization at the time of occurrence of the first nesitov. Between the “Hittites”-Indo-Europeans and “protohettami” – there is no genetic or ethnic ties, although the term “proto-” implies it. 5. The Bible calls the Hittites, heteyanami, Hittites all the people mentioned in the above paragraphs. Actually thanks to this book all the first time and learned about the existence of Hittite power in ancient times. 6. In ordinary consciousness of those who have heard at least something about the Hittites, and to popularize the representation deliberately primitivized modern scientific exposition, the Hittites – is the first in the history of Indo-Europeans who conquered Asia Minor and prevailed in those lands. They are pioneers in the iron and competitors of ancient Egypt, who built a great civilization. contradictions hidden in terminology and the terminology is the basis of the proper filing of the information. Terminology – a conditional language, and if there are contradictions, in the knowledge there is confusion. With regard to our definition, if the information in paragraph 1 to take the number as correct or true definition of the term, the information in paragraph number 2 and number 3 – turns out not true, not accurate. If we assume that the correct information set out in paragraph number 2, we now have other items in error. In any case, the term – “protohetty” specified in paragraph number 4, is initially not true – it is not competent definition. You can not use a prefix – “proto-” where there is no consistent genetic and ethnic ties. Due to this whole mess, and formed a scientific statement contained in paragraph number 6 – primitivized and popularized the concept of the Hittites. That’s one of the samples of such notions: “But the Hittites continued to ask riddles. And the chief was yet to come – in fact Hittite was an Indo-European language! This entailed another problem: the means and the people were Indo-European … “(Volkov, N. Forgetful.” Hittites. Unknown empire in Asia Minor “). As can be countered this mess and rather primitive ideas? That in addition to the phrase “Het zhegyIe!”, There is still the Circassians? And there is still much that is stored in the traditions of the Circassian people in the songs, in language, rituals, knowledge about ourselves. Scientific expedition to collect vintage songs Circassians in the 30 years of the twentieth century, has found the song on bzhedugskom dialect Circassians. We present here the lyrics translated into the Russian language: “The Hittites our grandfathers, the ancient tribe are, legendary belief. Hittite kingdom great for large sea lies, becoming famous, is expanding. His border to Egypt brought the Hittites, Ramses – King of Egypt Unhappy with this war begins. The Hittites their knowledge in all aspects of bringing governor of Egypt – Pharaoh Ramses comes to the Hittites, the Agreement concluded together. Both sides were related … ” As they say – no comment … There are examples of linguistic and Abkhaz language, which are related to the Circassian. In the vernacular of the Abkhaz There is one very interesting expression. When the Abkhaz want to say the phrase, “Mother Tongue”, he says: “A-Ha Tay byzshaa”, which literally translated into Russian, as: – “Hutt language.” In addition, all of the Circassian dialects to ask the man – “who are you?”, You say, ‘ue uhet? “, Which literally translated -” you Hittite? “That is, in the semantic meaning:” you own? ” “You is ours.”At the Circassians and today are fairly common names with the root “huts”, which are conserved Hittite past – Khatko (Hetykue) Hatyzh (Hetyzh) Atazhukin (Hetezhykue), as well as the names – Hetu, Hete, Hetyze etc.; also one of the Circassian Peoples called – hatukaytsy. All this is knowledge of the Circassian people of its glorious past, of itself, so they are closer to the truth to common sense. Are robust and scientists such statements: “On the other side of science are also established undeniable traits of kinship of the Caucasian languages ​​with some now dead languages ​​of the Near East, in particular protohettskih language. This last, as it turns out, is particularly close to the Abkhaz-Adyghe languages, in particular Ubykh. ” Talking about the relationship “protohettskih” language with Adyghe-Abkhaz GAMelikishvili G. writes: “The use of prefixes as morphological elements, as well as many other effects of morphological structure of the language actually brings him to the highlanders Caucasian languages ​​(Ubykh, Circassian, Abazinian). ST Eremyan also classifies ancient Abkhazian-Circassian tribes to protohettskih ethnic world. “According to the famous Russian author Alexander aces, “protohetty” Hatta and historical Atlanteans – they are different names for one and the same people. The author writes: “So, defined the location of Atlantis – a real country Dardanovogo killed in the flood. Inhabited this country highly developed nation – Atlanta, more Hutts, protohetty.Atlantean culture has had a huge impact on the culture of the surrounding nations, including the Slav. ” . need to pay attention to the following. As described above, and Science and the Bible, and the usual popularized the view is called the Hittites different “subjects”, thereby contradicting one another. And they do not know for certain which of these “entities” referred to himself as the Hittites. On the other side of the Circassians Hittites no one calls, but they call themselves, and see themselves as descendants of the ancient people of this particular. Why there was such confusion in terms of why the Indo-European component of the knowledge of the Hittites came to the fore, and “protohettskih” component remains in the shade and accordingly the value of the Circassians and their knowledge of it are invisible, and even unknown to science? After all, no doubt, and it shows, as they say, to the naked eye, that the knowledge of the Hittites, as well as their own country and their history is made ​​up of two components – neindoevropeyskoy and Indo-European. first cause confusion and the fact that, in modern terms, an Indo-European component has a greater “public relations”, that the discoverers of the Hittites – the Europeans themselves. So that they attach great importance to “own” the Indo-European component – is completely natural. The second reason – it is, of course, is that the very discovery of the civilization of the Hittites, and deciphering texts took place in the late XIX – early XX centuries. – That is, in the heyday – “Indo-European ideas.” Then science behaved like this: find a cart, which once ran past the so-called “Indo-European” and immediately Science stated: “This is our cart!”, Thus, never noticing that in the cart, then sat two Africans. .. Science, which itself is Indo-European, by definition, opening the Hittites, Indo-Europeans called them. It was a powerful civilization, a rival of Egypt, the discoverer of iron, and the temptation to call it the first Indo-European civilization was very large. Especially cuneiform tablets were found on a hitherto unknown Indo-European language. So firmly established opinion: the Hittites – this is the first Indo-Europeans, who built a civilization equal to ancient Egypt, and so on … Huttese primordial element has been left in the shadows, although he now lies on the surface, but this topic is now almost do not work out. If you develop it, the Indo-European component will lose a lot.Here are some details that lie on the surface, but in the “shadow”: 1. Prior to Asia Minor began to appear Indo-Europeans – there was already a highly developed civilization, and strangers to it did not add anything significant. We can say that they have come to a ready-made. The fact that came to Asia Minor, Indo-Europeans were below the level of culture – also known. 2. The aliens have not won territory Hatti – for centuries they gradually settled and assimilated among the local population. 3. The pivotal element of culture, and the main control – it is a religion. It has remained the same as before the Indo-European language of the sacred ritual was pre-Indo – Hutt. Even the name of the gods remained Hutt. 4. And the Caucasian country Ashuyya and Maikop culture, and the Hittite empire – all links in a continuous chain. Hittites consider separately – it’s just not seeing the whole historical picture as a whole. After all, Country Hattie was not an island of civilization, and was part of a larger one world along the southern and eastern coast of the Black Sea, albeit with separate centers, but with the kindred tribes. 5. There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans at least somewhat dominated in the Land of Hatti. Either in politics or in culture or in religion, they do not sway. Even the situation is somewhat the opposite. It is known that most of the kings wore Hutt, not Indo-European names. Religion has not changed under the influence of newcomers. And the quote is another fact: “The merger of the Indo-Europeans with native tribes in the Hutt Central Asia Minor formed Hittite ethnic group, who created around the middle of the XVIII century. BC. e. powerful Hittite state, fully embrace the rich cultural traditions of the Hutt “(GG Giorgadze.” Ancient History “, 1989). 6. Hittites called themselves, not Indo-Europeans, and the Hutts – and now continue to call themselves Circassians. However, I might say, why then Hutt language in the Land of Hatti was dead, preserved only in religious texts and rituals, and became the Indo-European language of the proceedings, diplomacy Hetskom tsarstve.I is it really? This question is answered scientist Gordon Childe, in his book “Aryans – the founders of European civilization”: “First of all, the material that we have at our disposal, and this plate from the state archives of Hittite kings in Boghazkoy reflects only the language in which the said the Hittites in Cappadocia, and on this basis it is impossible to draw any conclusions regarding the other “Hittites”, for example, those who lived in Carchemish in northern Syria. Moreover, now it is clear that even in Cappadocia, there was a large number of languages: Pali, Mitanni and protohettskih. On the latter should pay particular attention, as he left behind their own written records. There is no doubt that the “Hittites” can not be attributed to a number of Indo-Europeans. Another thing dialect, which themselves scribes called “our language”, no doubt experienced the Indo-European influence. ” It is a pity of course that Gordon Childe did not know that the Circassians have an expression – “Be Hett!” – this would make it even more convinced in correctness of his conclusions. Sam Hutt language, of course, refers to a group of Adygea abhazzskoy-Caucasian language family, and as complex as the Circassian Ubykh, Abkhazian languages ​​.. Many native language Hutt could move to a simpler Indo-European language, especially in the field of public administration. Similar examples in the history of the Circassians were later – Circassian Mamluk sultans, ruled an empire in Arabic. A modern Circassians in Turkey have moved into Turkish, to both the public and easier language than their mother tongue. Apparently, this happened in the Land of Hatti, where more than a simple Indo-European language has spread rapidly multiethnic empire as more acceptable as an international and local Hutt complex language remained as a spoken language and the sacred. Otherwise, as modern scientists say if hatsky language completely disappeared back in those days, remaining only in religious texts, and became a dead language, then how to have survived the phrase – “Het zhegyIe!”?To answer this question, we need to show the contradictions that exist in science – hettologii. To do this, we present a table in which the left-hand side – well-established scientific or become popular theses (red font), and the right part of the – counter or knowledge of the Circassian people about themselves (blue): 1. The Hittites – Indo-Europeans. 1. Yes, indeed, among the ethnic group, called “Hittites”, was a significant Indo-European com-ponents. Indo-Europeans but they did not call themselves – “Hittite.” This exonym by the name of the country, the inhabitants of which they were, and that existed before them. Hittites called themselves natives – Hatta (“protohetty”). And now in the modern world by the Hittites called themselves Circassians. 2. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, the creators of advanced civilization and powers equal to ancient Egypt. 2. Civilization Hutt existed long before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor. 3.Anitas king – the first king of the Hittites 3. And to Anitas in the Land of Hatti kings were, however, Anitas first king caught in the record which read our contemporaries scientists. It is a mistake to begin with Anitas history of the Hittites. 4. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans – the discoverers of iron. 4. Iron was known Hutts before the Indo-Europeans came to Central Asia Minor. This is indicated by the message of Pharaoh king of Hatti with a request to send him an iron dagger. The message is dated 2000 BC. e. 5. -Indo-European Hittites ruled Asia Minor from 1750 to 1200 years BC 5.There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans were somewhat dominated the rest of the population of the country of Hatti. Rather the reverse: most famous kings wore Hutt names. 6. The Indo-Europeans conquered Asia Minor and established the Empire. 6. In the literature, many times repeated, that the conquest was not, and there was a gradual settlement of the Indo-Europeans in the Land of Hatti, and integration. From the above we can draw the following conclusions: 1. Necessary to create a science Circassian Abhazalogii to live with the position of the fragments of an ancient civilization – Cherkess (Circassians), Ubykhs the Abaza, Abkhaz to reconsider the knowledge of the Hittites, the country Ashuyya, ancient Mesopotamia, the Maikop culture, not separately, but in unity. It also requires knowledge of the languages ​​and dialects of all these Caucasian peoples. 2. The opening of which John Kolaruso reported in 2011 (details in a later chapter), once again confirms that the future Europeans and future Circassians in the past for a long time been in interaction with each other. 3. There is a popular belief about the Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, who created the Hittite power does not hold water. We can only speak Otomi that the country of Hatti, there is some component of the Indo-European. At the same backbone political model – Confederation controlled by a single ruler, and in fact has a socialist system of government – that is nonsense for the Ancient World, remained. 4. The only pieces of Hatti Countries that existed before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor – it’s Circassians and Abkhazians. And for them, “Hittite” – an ancient self. 5. History of the Hittites did not have a gap between the XII and XVIII centuries. BC. e. This is exactly the time when the Europeans future and the future of the Circassians, Abkhazians coexisted within the same public education. It was during this period of time the Europeans borrowed from the future of the future of the Circassians, Abkhaz culture, which became the basis of European civilization, not to mention the genes which, according to the latest findings, in large enough quantities is among the Europeans. 6. History in the case of the Hittites once again shows its bias and clumsiness, and the “authority” prodavlivaya “best” ideas, and being by definition the “Indo-European” – pulls the blanket over himself. Now I want to give an interesting example of the Bible in the Hittite subject. It is the story of perhaps the most famous of the Hittites – Uriah Hettiyanine. This character of the Old Testament was in the list of the best soldiers of the governor of the state of Israel – King David. It tells about 11 head of the 2nd Book of Kings. All who read the Old Testament, remember this story. The act of Uriah the Hittite is completely separate from the other acts and the acts described in the Bible. What is the difference? You might ask. The difference in motivation. Bible is full of stories about the various exploits, deeds, deeds. They are committed in the name of faith, the Lord of kings, women, brothers. There were acts committed because of lust for power, greed, and the other was the cause of meanness, selfishness, etc. There were, of course, act in the name of love and compassion. That is, in each case has its own motive. And Uriah act is fundamentally different from all the others, described in the Old Testament, it was his motivation. Let’s remember how it was. Uriah the Hittite, refuses to go home to sleep with his wife, thereby violating the order of their king – David. David himself so wanted to hide the cause of his wife’s pregnancy Uriah – Bathsheba.Pregnancy, as we learn from the same story, came from the fact that at the time, as long as Uriah was at war, King David’s wife forced him to close and she suffered from it. If Uriah at least one night spent at home, it would be possible to justify pregnancy Beersheba. So King David through cunning attempts to send Uriah home to spend the night. And Uriah refuses to go home at night, although it is an order of the king, and, as we know the word gentleman – the law for his servants. But no, Uriah did not go home and spend the night at the gate of the palace, along with security. He did not comply with an order of the king, and should any of its own internal installation. And this set is stronger than the word of a king, though the king’s word, and the law for his servants. At the very same King David about this setup is not even know, or he would have chosen a different tactical trick against Uriah. Some kind of ethical standard, unknown to King David and the other Israelis, Uriah does not allow to execute the order of the king. Any other warrior in place of Uriah, who came from the war, and who had not seen for a long time my wife would love to obey the order of the king, without even thinking. But not the Hittite. He is the king says, “… and my lord Joab and the servants of my lord are in the field, and I went to his house to eat and drink, and sleep with my wife? I swear by thy life and the life of your soul, I will not do! “This behavior says that Uriah the Hittite is subject to ethical standards that at a later time, known as the Circassians -” zekIue habze “- the unwritten law of marching. It is part of the Circassian ethics – Adyghe Khabza. During the raid, campaign, war, every soldier obeys the “zekIue habze.” The fundamental principle of the law marching sounds like this: “The interests of the group (party, army detachment) is always more important than the interests of any single voina.Ni separately taken warrior can not have any privileges and benefits as opposed to the other before the end of the campaign (war, the raid) . Other important principles of this Code are as follows: “To leave the battlefield for any reason, except for tactical reasons, leaving the other – means to cover their name and shame their children forever” “The commander elected only during the campaign, and only by their personal qualities.” “Commander leaves last battlefield. ” ‘surrender – the biggest disgrace. ” These principles and requirements remained the Circassians in their military culture until the end of the XIX century. And in the understanding of Uriah – to go to bed with his wife at the time, when his combat comrades in the field, it equates to flee from the battlefield. Such an understanding in principle characteristic of Hittite. The only possible way out for himself, he sees – to spend the night with the same soldiers like himself, to the protection of the palace, with soldiers who are directly in the line of military obyazonnostey. Thus, Uriah creates for himself the situation in which he can consider himself not run away from the battlefield. King David was re-invited me Uriah the next day and “eating with him and drank, and he made ​​him drunk.” King hoped that Uriah drunk certainly will spend the night home to his wife. However, it is not, is not, – sleeps with security at the gate of the palace.Even napivshiysya Uriah did not violate its internal charter. It must be emphasized that no one ever would have blamed him if he slept at home. Only his inner principle and military upbringing, his conscience and his judge. It is this military principle, unknown to the Israelis would not allow the will of the king of Uriah. If you say that this is not surprising, such a principle would not only be from the Hittites and the Circassians you would be wrong, because the Jews of this is not known, it is very clear from the biblical story. seems that Uriah repeatedly said senior “Het zhegyIe” – “Be Hett!” – that is, “to multiply the glory of the Hittites!”. And he actually went on and increase in the millennium. Uriah the Hittite – the symbol of this military honor. The honor cost him his life. Uriah name a few times in the history of the Circassians, and probably in the pre-Christian Circassia was quite common. 1. From the ancient inscriptions known – Ware Hetu – full namesake of Uriah the Hittite, of which four thousand years ago wrote an Assyrian king Narasmin. This inscription is carved in stone. Says that of the Western Caucasus thousand years ago came under the leadership of the Hutts Ware Hetu and captured the city of Akkad, and built a city Carchemish and Thapsek. 2. Ueri Dade – the so-called leader Kasogs (ancestors of the Circassians), who fought a duel with the Russian Tmutarakan Prince Mstislav in 1022 in the Russian chronicles the name sounds like – “Rededi.” 3. Ueri Dade – the so-called People’s Court judge, in a story about a wise man Zhabagiev cauldron. Ueri Zhabagiev was the forerunner of the People’s Court. In all cases, except for the story about the judge, the name of Uriah are soldiers – unit commanders. Perhaps this is a military post, or some kind of nickname given to colleagues for military merit, because in Circassian: “Uerra!” – Forward! “Ware” – a war, a war.”Uerubyd” – a prisoner of war. “Uerysh” – Warhorse . “Uerk” – a professional soldier, officer. (The letter “E” in the Circassian language-A short beep) Apparently, the English word – “war” and the Bulgarian – “Thief” – derived from this ancient root .. Wife Uriah the Hittite, which later became the wife of King David and King Solomon’s mother, was called – Bathsheba that twisted like – Bathsheba. “Baie-it-schabe” in the language of the Circassians read: Baie many IT “containing” Schabe, “gentle.” Just-“tender”. As the name for a girl in today’s Circassian world, the name of the organic and reminiscent of the Circassian names such as – NefIytsIe – “black-eyed” Pague – “snub” Naschhue – “gray-eyed”, Schabe – “soft, tender”. The name of her grandfather – Ahithophel. This name contains three Circassian roots: “het” – Hittite, “fe” – appearance, form and “lly” – man. “A” – is common in the Abkhaz-Adyghe language group prefix pointing to a specific object specifying affix. Linguists are trying to translate the name from the Hebrew, the result is – “brother of madness.” Agree, not the most appropriate name for the adviser of King David and indeed the name allogichno for any nation. which has several meanings. The first – “what happened.” And the second – “the science that studies and describes what it was.” Very often it happens that describes the history of science that was inaccurate, often misunderstood and distorted – errs, errs, is a captive of their established patterns and concepts. Mistakes happen intentionally and unintentionally, accidentally and intentionally. Like any science, history likes to make discoveries at its disposal interesting facts. Scientists themselves – are also people, and nothing human is alien to them. After making the discovery – that recognition, fame and career. But with all this science of history remains inert and conservative, with great difficulty accepting new attitudes and new approaches to old problems. Why? The fact is that any current concept of the power of science – is the fruit of the labor of some of the outstanding scientist, authority in this area of expertise.Someone dared to revise his opinion, must complete at least years – 40-50 after the death of that luminary of science.And then someone will say that this scientist was wrong, or say that this concept should be reviewed. We can say that historical science is slowly “goes” on the “authorities” that her train slowly creeping up the hill. There is another reason for the slowness and conservatism. The fact that many scientists have made ​​their careers by now well-established concepts and move them virtually impossible. To this can be added the fact that the state formation, religious and political organizations as well as national and nationalist, practicing or promoting a certain ideology, are contributing to the “noble cause” rewriting history. Thus, the line up “favorable” and “digestible” versions of historical concepts. All of this ultimately gives biased science. discovering something new, science proceeds as follows – look, fit this new fact in the current orderly scheme, the “right” ideology and politics. If the fit – great! You can congratulate the opening of confirming the discovery of the past. And if you can not understand or, even worse for the discoverer, – destroys the existing opinion? Then leave while unattended and push in the “back burner” until better times. One such amazing and indigestible to the facts of science is a phrase that exists among the Circassians as a figure of speech, such as sustainable phrase: “Het zhegyIe!”, which translated into Russian means – “Be Hett». A detailed interpretation of the meaning: “Behave yourself so that you talked about: he – Hittite.” This phrase is also hidden emotional appeal “to multiply and continue the glory of the Hittites!”. This phrase is now actively used in everyday speech, the Circassians, it is – the current live the phrase used by the people. Usually it says senior years younger naputstvuya or instructing. For example, watching the road, in the army, to school, to the competition. should also pay attention to the fact that in the phrase, “Be Hett!” no value or meaning, which would be expressed in the phrase, “Be like or similar Hetty” or same “imitate Hetty.” It calls not to try to be like the Hittite, and it is not to forget that you Hittite. That is the kind of person who utters this expression, considers himself and the person to whom it is said – the Hittites. On this basis, it is clear and understandable, that we are dealing with the archaic self-designation of the Circassians. This is evidenced by the common sense, because it is logical, for example, that the Russian might say to his younger – “Do not forget that you are Russian,” but unlikely to say – “Do not forget that you are a Pole!”. The Chinese say this: “whether the Chinese!” But in any case will not call his younger-be Japanese. Circassians consider themselves Hittites called themselves the Hittites, and in this capacious phrase tremendous emotional content – the pride of ethnic belonging and pride historical.In this phrase, apart from the direct sense, founded and still call – and continue to increase the glory of the Hittites. And that’s what the Circassians consider themselves Hittites and call themselves by the Hittites, a problem with the official historical version. Where geographically Hittites, and where the Circassians? At what time of the Hittites lived, and when there were Circassians? What do they overlap? So can ask us questions scientists hettologi. And then do they say, “The Circassians Hittites can not be!”. Because none of the discoverers of the Hittites, whose works are the basis of knowledge of this ancient people were not aware of the phrase “Het zhegyIe,” and still occuring at the Circassians.Hettologiya otherwise probably would have gone a different way. It turns out this discrepancy, this little phrase, being taken into account, can change the existing concept and give rise to completely revise the Hittite perspective! Now, in the current concept of a single thread linking the Circassians and the Hittite power, is the thesis that the language of the inhabitants of pre-Indo-Malaya Asia – Hutt similar in structure and vocabulary of the languages ​​of the Abkhaz-Adyghe (Circassian, Ubykh, Abaza, Abkhaz). But this “thin thread” science is not interested and does not develop it. Let us now take some scientific texts and identify them on the Hittites, and subject the thing in question. Let’s start with the big terminological confusion that exists regarding the Hittites. This confusion is one of the main reasons as to who the Hittites. So: 1. Hittites science calls the people who spoke an Indo-European language, which appeared from nowhere in the Land of Hatti. He gradually over several centuries colonized the country and became co-exist with the local indigenous population – the Hutts. 2. Hittites science also refers to the people, formed as a result of a long cohabitation and mixing with the local Indo-European aliens aboriginal population – not Indo Hutts. In general, the Hittites called all the inhabitants of the Hittite state. 3. Hittites called the people who lived in small kingdoms – the ruins of the once-powerful Hittite power scattered throughout Anatolia after the fall of the empire. 4. “Protohettami” science calls the people who lived in Asia Minor before the Indo-Europeans began to appear there. Self-designation of the indigenous population were the Hittites and Hatti, – depending on the dialect pronunciation. And they came to the land called Indo-Europeans themselves – nesity. Also in science says that “protohetty” had a mature civilization at the time of occurrence of the first nesitov. Between the “Hittites”-Indo-Europeans and “protohettami” – there is no genetic or ethnic ties, although the term “proto-” implies it. 5. The Bible calls the Hittites, heteyanami, Hittites all the people mentioned in the above paragraphs. Actually thanks to this book all the first time and learned about the existence of Hittite power in ancient times. 6. In ordinary consciousness of those who have heard at least something about the Hittites, and to popularize the representation deliberately primitivized modern scientific exposition, the Hittites – is the first in the history of Indo-Europeans who conquered Asia Minor and prevailed in those lands. They are pioneers in the iron and competitors of ancient Egypt, who built a great civilization. contradictions hidden in terminology and the terminology is the basis of the proper filing of the information. Terminology – a conditional language, and if there are contradictions, in the knowledge there is confusion. With regard to our definition, if the information in paragraph 1 to take the number as correct or true definition of the term, the information in paragraph number 2 and number 3 – turns out not true, not accurate. If we assume that the correct information set out in paragraph number 2, we now have other items in error. In any case, the term – “protohetty” specified in paragraph number 4, is initially not true – it is not competent definition. You can not use a prefix – “proto-” where there is no consistent genetic and ethnic ties. Due to this whole mess, and formed a scientific statement contained in paragraph number 6 – primitivized and popularized the concept of the Hittites. That’s one of the samples of such notions: “But the Hittites continued to ask riddles. And the chief was yet to come – in fact Hittite was an Indo-European language! This entailed another problem: the means and the people were Indo-European … “(Volkov, N. Forgetful.” Hittites. Unknown empire in Asia Minor “). As can be countered this mess and rather primitive ideas? That in addition to the phrase “Het zhegyIe!”, There is still the Circassians? And there is still much that is stored in the traditions of the Circassian people in the songs, in language, rituals, knowledge about ourselves. Scientific expedition to collect vintage songs Circassians in the 30 years of the twentieth century, has found the song on bzhedugskom dialect Circassians. We present here the lyrics translated into the Russian language: “The Hittites our grandfathers, the ancient tribe are, legendary belief. Hittite kingdom great for large sea lies, becoming famous, is expanding. His border to Egypt brought the Hittites, Ramses – King of Egypt Unhappy with this war begins. The Hittites their knowledge in all aspects of bringing governor of Egypt – Pharaoh Ramses comes to the Hittites, the Agreement concluded together. Both sides were related … ” As they say – no comment … There are examples of linguistic and Abkhaz language, which are related to the Circassian. In the vernacular of the Abkhaz There is one very interesting expression. When the Abkhaz want to say the phrase, “Mother Tongue”, he says: “A-Ha Tay byzshaa”, which literally translated into Russian, as: – “Hutt language.” In addition, all of the Circassian dialects to ask the man – “who are you?”, You say, ‘ue uhet? “, Which literally translated -” you Hittite? “That is, in the semantic meaning:” you own? ” “You is ours.”At the Circassians and today are fairly common names with the root “huts”, which are conserved Hittite past – Khatko (Hetykue) Hatyzh (Hetyzh) Atazhukin (Hetezhykue), as well as the names – Hetu, Hete, Hetyze etc.; also one of the Circassian Peoples called – hatukaytsy. All this is knowledge of the Circassian people of its glorious past, of itself, so they are closer to the truth to common sense. Are robust and scientists such statements: “On the other side of science are also established undeniable traits of kinship of the Caucasian languages ​​with some now dead languages ​​of the Near East, in particular protohettskih language. This last, as it turns out, is particularly close to the Abkhaz-Adyghe languages, in particular Ubykh. ” Talking about the relationship “protohettskih” language with Adyghe-Abkhaz GAMelikishvili G. writes: “The use of prefixes as morphological elements, as well as many other effects of morphological structure of the language actually brings him to the highlanders Caucasian languages ​​(Ubykh, Circassian, Abazinian). ST Eremyan also classifies ancient Abkhazian-Circassian tribes to protohettskih ethnic world. “According to the famous Russian author Alexander aces, “protohetty” Hatta and historical Atlanteans – they are different names for one and the same people. The author writes: “So, defined the location of Atlantis – a real country Dardanovogo killed in the flood. Inhabited this country highly developed nation – Atlanta, more Hutts, protohetty.Atlantean culture has had a huge impact on the culture of the surrounding nations, including the Slav. ” . need to pay attention to the following. As described above, and Science and the Bible, and the usual popularized the view is called the Hittites different “subjects”, thereby contradicting one another. And they do not know for certain which of these “entities” referred to himself as the Hittites. On the other side of the Circassians Hittites no one calls, but they call themselves, and see themselves as descendants of the ancient people of this particular. Why there was such confusion in terms of why the Indo-European component of the knowledge of the Hittites came to the fore, and “protohettskih” component remains in the shade and accordingly the value of the Circassians and their knowledge of it are invisible, and even unknown to science? After all, no doubt, and it shows, as they say, to the naked eye, that the knowledge of the Hittites, as well as their own country and their history is made ​​up of two components – neindoevropeyskoy and Indo-European. first cause confusion and the fact that, in modern terms, an Indo-European component has a greater “public relations”, that the discoverers of the Hittites – the Europeans themselves. So that they attach great importance to “own” the Indo-European component – is completely natural. The second reason – it is, of course, is that the very discovery of the civilization of the Hittites, and deciphering texts took place in the late XIX – early XX centuries. – That is, in the heyday – “Indo-European ideas.” Then science behaved like this: find a cart, which once ran past the so-called “Indo-European” and immediately Science stated: “This is our cart!”, Thus, never noticing that in the cart, then sat two Africans. .. Science, which itself is Indo-European, by definition, opening the Hittites, Indo-Europeans called them. It was a powerful civilization, a rival of Egypt, the discoverer of iron, and the temptation to call it the first Indo-European civilization was very large. Especially cuneiform tablets were found on a hitherto unknown Indo-European language. So firmly established opinion: the Hittites – this is the first Indo-Europeans, who built a civilization equal to ancient Egypt, and so on … Huttese primordial element has been left in the shadows, although he now lies on the surface, but this topic is now almost do not work out. If you develop it, the Indo-European component will lose a lot.Here are some details that lie on the surface, but in the “shadow”: 1. Prior to Asia Minor began to appear Indo-Europeans – there was already a highly developed civilization, and strangers to it did not add anything significant. We can say that they have come to a ready-made. The fact that came to Asia Minor, Indo-Europeans were below the level of culture – also known. 2. The aliens have not won territory Hatti – for centuries they gradually settled and assimilated among the local population. 3. The pivotal element of culture, and the main control – it is a religion. It has remained the same as before the Indo-European language of the sacred ritual was pre-Indo – Hutt. Even the name of the gods remained Hutt. 4. And the Caucasian country Ashuyya and Maikop culture, and the Hittite empire – all links in a continuous chain. Hittites consider separately – it’s just not seeing the whole historical picture as a whole. After all, Country Hattie was not an island of civilization, and was part of a larger one world along the southern and eastern coast of the Black Sea, albeit with separate centers, but with the kindred tribes. 5. There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans at least somewhat dominated in the Land of Hatti. Either in politics or in culture or in religion, they do not sway. Even the situation is somewhat the opposite. It is known that most of the kings wore Hutt, not Indo-European names. Religion has not changed under the influence of newcomers. And the quote is another fact: “The merger of the Indo-Europeans with native tribes in the Hutt Central Asia Minor formed Hittite ethnic group, who created around the middle of the XVIII century. BC. e. powerful Hittite state, fully embrace the rich cultural traditions of the Hutt “(GG Giorgadze.” Ancient History “, 1989). 6. Hittites called themselves, not Indo-Europeans, and the Hutts – and now continue to call themselves Circassians. However, I might say, why then Hutt language in the Land of Hatti was dead, preserved only in religious texts and rituals, and became the Indo-European language of the proceedings, diplomacy Hetskom tsarstve.I is it really? This question is answered scientist Gordon Childe, in his book “Aryans – the founders of European civilization”: “First of all, the material that we have at our disposal, and this plate from the state archives of Hittite kings in Boghazkoy reflects only the language in which the said the Hittites in Cappadocia, and on this basis it is impossible to draw any conclusions regarding the other “Hittites”, for example, those who lived in Carchemish in northern Syria. Moreover, now it is clear that even in Cappadocia, there was a large number of languages: Pali, Mitanni and protohettskih. On the latter should pay particular attention, as he left behind their own written records. There is no doubt that the “Hittites” can not be attributed to a number of Indo-Europeans. Another thing dialect, which themselves scribes called “our language”, no doubt experienced the Indo-European influence. ” It is a pity of course that Gordon Childe did not know that the Circassians have an expression – “Be Hett!” – this would make it even more convinced in correctness of his conclusions. Sam Hutt language, of course, refers to a group of Adygea abhazzskoy-Caucasian language family, and as complex as the Circassian Ubykh, Abkhazian languages ​​.. Many native language Hutt could move to a simpler Indo-European language, especially in the field of public administration. Similar examples in the history of the Circassians were later – Circassian Mamluk sultans, ruled an empire in Arabic. A modern Circassians in Turkey have moved into Turkish, to both the public and easier language than their mother tongue. Apparently, this happened in the Land of Hatti, where more than a simple Indo-European language has spread rapidly multiethnic empire as more acceptable as an international and local Hutt complex language remained as a spoken language and the sacred. Otherwise, as modern scientists say if hatsky language completely disappeared back in those days, remaining only in religious texts, and became a dead language, then how to have survived the phrase – “Het zhegyIe!”?To answer this question, we need to show the contradictions that exist in science – hettologii. To do this, we present a table in which the left-hand side – well-established scientific or become popular theses (red font), and the right part of the – counter or knowledge of the Circassian people about themselves (blue): 1. The Hittites – Indo-Europeans. 1. Yes, indeed, among the ethnic group, called “Hittites”, was a significant Indo-European com-ponents. Indo-Europeans but they did not call themselves – “Hittite.” This exonym by the name of the country, the inhabitants of which they were, and that existed before them. Hittites called themselves natives – Hatta (“protohetty”). And now in the modern world by the Hittites called themselves Circassians. 2. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, the creators of advanced civilization and powers equal to ancient Egypt. 2. Civilization Hutt existed long before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor. 3.Anitas king – the first king of the Hittites 3. And to Anitas in the Land of Hatti kings were, however, Anitas first king caught in the record which read our contemporaries scientists. It is a mistake to begin with Anitas history of the Hittites. 4. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans – the discoverers of iron. 4. Iron was known Hutts before the Indo-Europeans came to Central Asia Minor. This is indicated by the message of Pharaoh king of Hatti with a request to send him an iron dagger. The message is dated 2000 BC. e. 5. -Indo-European Hittites ruled Asia Minor from 1750 to 1200 years BC 5.There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans were somewhat dominated the rest of the population of the country of Hatti. Rather the reverse: most famous kings wore Hutt names. 6. The Indo-Europeans conquered Asia Minor and established the Empire. 6. In the literature, many times repeated, that the conquest was not, and there was a gradual settlement of the Indo-Europeans in the Land of Hatti, and integration. From the above we can draw the following conclusions: 1. Necessary to create a science Circassian Abhazalogii to live with the position of the fragments of an ancient civilization – Cherkess (Circassians), Ubykhs the Abaza, Abkhaz to reconsider the knowledge of the Hittites, the country Ashuyya, ancient Mesopotamia, the Maikop culture, not separately, but in unity. It also requires knowledge of the languages ​​and dialects of all these Caucasian peoples. 2. The opening of which John Kolaruso reported in 2011 (details in a later chapter), once again confirms that the future Europeans and future Circassians in the past for a long time been in interaction with each other. 3. There is a popular belief about the Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, who created the Hittite power does not hold water. We can only speak Otomi that the country of Hatti, there is some component of the Indo-European. At the same backbone political model – Confederation controlled by a single ruler, and in fact has a socialist system of government – that is nonsense for the Ancient World, remained. 4. The only pieces of Hatti Countries that existed before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor – it’s Circassians and Abkhazians. And for them, “Hittite” – an ancient self. 5. History of the Hittites did not have a gap between the XII and XVIII centuries. BC. e. This is exactly the time when the Europeans future and the future of the Circassians, Abkhazians coexisted within the same public education. It was during this period of time the Europeans borrowed from the future of the future of the Circassians, Abkhaz culture, which became the basis of European civilization, not to mention the genes which, according to the latest findings, in large enough quantities is among the Europeans. 6. History in the case of the Hittites once again shows its bias and clumsiness, and the “authority” prodavlivaya “best” ideas, and being by definition the “Indo-European” – pulls the blanket over himself. Now I want to give an interesting example of the Bible in the Hittite subject. It is the story of perhaps the most famous of the Hittites – Uriah Hettiyanine. This character of the Old Testament was in the list of the best soldiers of the governor of the state of Israel – King David. It tells about 11 head of the 2nd Book of Kings. All who read the Old Testament, remember this story. The act of Uriah the Hittite is completely separate from the other acts and the acts described in the Bible. What is the difference? You might ask. The difference in motivation. Bible is full of stories about the various exploits, deeds, deeds. They are committed in the name of faith, the Lord of kings, women, brothers. There were acts committed because of lust for power, greed, and the other was the cause of meanness, selfishness, etc. There were, of course, act in the name of love and compassion. That is, in each case has its own motive. And Uriah act is fundamentally different from all the others, described in the Old Testament, it was his motivation. Let’s remember how it was. Uriah the Hittite, refuses to go home to sleep with his wife, thereby violating the order of their king – David. David himself so wanted to hide the cause of his wife’s pregnancy Uriah – Bathsheba.Pregnancy, as we learn from the same story, came from the fact that at the time, as long as Uriah was at war, King David’s wife forced him to close and she suffered from it. If Uriah at least one night spent at home, it would be possible to justify pregnancy Beersheba. So King David through cunning attempts to send Uriah home to spend the night. And Uriah refuses to go home at night, although it is an order of the king, and, as we know the word gentleman – the law for his servants. But no, Uriah did not go home and spend the night at the gate of the palace, along with security. He did not comply with an order of the king, and should any of its own internal installation. And this set is stronger than the word of a king, though the king’s word, and the law for his servants. At the very same King David about this setup is not even know, or he would have chosen a different tactical trick against Uriah. Some kind of ethical standard, unknown to King David and the other Israelis, Uriah does not allow to execute the order of the king. Any other warrior in place of Uriah, who came from the war, and who had not seen for a long time my wife would love to obey the order of the king, without even thinking. But not the Hittite. He is the king says, “… and my lord Joab and the servants of my lord are in the field, and I went to his house to eat and drink, and sleep with my wife? I swear by thy life and the life of your soul, I will not do! “This behavior says that Uriah the Hittite is subject to ethical standards that at a later time, known as the Circassians -” zekIue habze “- the unwritten law of marching. It is part of the Circassian ethics – Adyghe Khabza. During the raid, campaign, war, every soldier obeys the “zekIue habze.” The fundamental principle of the law marching sounds like this: “The interests of the group (party, army detachment) is always more important than the interests of any single voina.Ni separately taken warrior can not have any privileges and benefits as opposed to the other before the end of the campaign (war, the raid) . Other important principles of this Code are as follows: “To leave the battlefield for any reason, except for tactical reasons, leaving the other – means to cover their name and shame their children forever” “The commander elected only during the campaign, and only by their personal qualities.” “Commander leaves last battlefield. ” ‘surrender – the biggest disgrace. ” These principles and requirements remained the Circassians in their military culture until the end of the XIX century. And in the understanding of Uriah – to go to bed with his wife at the time, when his combat comrades in the field, it equates to flee from the battlefield. Such an understanding in principle characteristic of Hittite. The only possible way out for himself, he sees – to spend the night with the same soldiers like himself, to the protection of the palace, with soldiers who are directly in the line of military obyazonnostey. Thus, Uriah creates for himself the situation in which he can consider himself not run away from the battlefield. King David was re-invited me Uriah the next day and “eating with him and drank, and he made ​​him drunk.” King hoped that Uriah drunk certainly will spend the night home to his wife. However, it is not, is not, – sleeps with security at the gate of the palace.Even napivshiysya Uriah did not violate its internal charter. It must be emphasized that no one ever would have blamed him if he slept at home. Only his inner principle and military upbringing, his conscience and his judge. It is this military principle, unknown to the Israelis would not allow the will of the king of Uriah. If you say that this is not surprising, such a principle would not only be from the Hittites and the Circassians you would be wrong, because the Jews of this is not known, it is very clear from the biblical story. seems that Uriah repeatedly said senior “Het zhegyIe” – “Be Hett!” – that is, “to multiply the glory of the Hittites!”. And he actually went on and increase in the millennium. Uriah the Hittite – the symbol of this military honor. The honor cost him his life. Uriah name a few times in the history of the Circassians, and probably in the pre-Christian Circassia was quite common. 1. From the ancient inscriptions known – Ware Hetu – full namesake of Uriah the Hittite, of which four thousand years ago wrote an Assyrian king Narasmin. This inscription is carved in stone. Says that of the Western Caucasus thousand years ago came under the leadership of the Hutts Ware Hetu and captured the city of Akkad, and built a city Carchemish and Thapsek. 2. Ueri Dade – the so-called leader Kasogs (ancestors of the Circassians), who fought a duel with the Russian Tmutarakan Prince Mstislav in 1022 in the Russian chronicles the name sounds like – “Rededi.” 3. Ueri Dade – the so-called People’s Court judge, in a story about a wise man Zhabagiev cauldron. Ueri Zhabagiev was the forerunner of the People’s Court. In all cases, except for the story about the judge, the name of Uriah are soldiers – unit commanders. Perhaps this is a military post, or some kind of nickname given to colleagues for military merit, because in Circassian: “Uerra!” – Forward! “Ware” – a war, a war.”Uerubyd” – a prisoner of war. “Uerysh” – Warhorse . “Uerk” – a professional soldier, officer. (The letter “E” in the Circassian language-A short beep) Apparently, the English word – “war” and the Bulgarian – “Thief” – derived from this ancient root .. Wife Uriah the Hittite, which later became the wife of King David and King Solomon’s mother, was called – Bathsheba that twisted like – Bathsheba. “Baie-it-schabe” in the language of the Circassians read: Baie many IT “containing” Schabe, “gentle.” Just-“tender”. As the name for a girl in today’s Circassian world, the name of the organic and reminiscent of the Circassian names such as – NefIytsIe – “black-eyed” Pague – “snub” Naschhue – “gray-eyed”, Schabe – “soft, tender”. The name of her grandfather – Ahithophel. This name contains three Circassian roots: “het” – Hittite, “fe” – appearance, form and “lly” – man. “A” – is common in the Abkhaz-Adyghe language group prefix pointing to a specific object specifying affix. Linguists are trying to translate the name from the Hebrew, the result is – “brother of madness.” Agree, not the most appropriate name for the adviser of King David and indeed the name allogichno for any nation. dominant in science – is the fruit of the labor of some of the outstanding scientist, authority in this area of ​​expertise. Someone dared to revise his opinion, must complete at least years – 40-50 after the death of that luminary of science. And then someone will say that this scientist was wrong, or say that this concept should be reviewed. We can say that historical science is slowly “goes” on the “authorities” that her train slowly creeping up the hill. There is another reason for the slowness and conservatism. The fact that many scientists have made ​​their careers by now well-established concepts and move them virtually impossible. To this can be added the fact that the state formation, religious and political organizations as well as national and nationalist, practicing or promoting a certain ideology, are contributing to the “noble cause” rewriting history. Thus, the line up “favorable” and “digestible” versions of historical concepts. All of this ultimately gives biased science. discovering something new, science proceeds as follows – look, fit this new fact in the current orderly scheme, the “right” ideology and politics. If the fit – great! You can congratulate the opening of confirming the discovery of the past. And if you can not understand or, even worse for the discoverer, – destroys the existing opinion? Then leave while unattended and push in the “back burner” until better times. One such amazing and indigestible to the facts of science is a phrase that exists among the Circassians as a figure of speech, such as sustainable phrase: “Het zhegyIe!”, which translated into Russian means – “Be Hett». A detailed interpretation of the meaning: “Behave yourself so that you talked about: he – Hittite.” This phrase is also hidden emotional appeal “to multiply and continue the glory of the Hittites!”. This phrase is now actively used in everyday speech, the Circassians, it is – the current live the phrase used by the people. Usually it says senior years younger naputstvuya or instructing. For example, watching the road, in the army, to school, to the competition. should also pay attention to the fact that in the phrase, “Be Hett!” no value or meaning, which would be expressed in the phrase, “Be like or similar Hetty” or same “imitate Hetty.” It calls not to try to be like the Hittite, and it is not to forget that you Hittite. That is the kind of person who utters this expression, considers himself and the person to whom it is said – the Hittites. On this basis, it is clear and understandable, that we are dealing with the archaic self-designation of the Circassians. This is evidenced by the common sense, because it is logical, for example, that the Russian might say to his younger – “Do not forget that you are Russian,” but unlikely to say – “Do not forget that you are a Pole!”. The Chinese say this: “whether the Chinese!” But in any case will not call his younger-be Japanese. Circassians consider themselves Hittites called themselves the Hittites, and in this capacious phrase tremendous emotional content – the pride of ethnic belonging and pride historical.In this phrase, apart from the direct sense, founded and still call – and continue to increase the glory of the Hittites. And that’s what the Circassians consider themselves Hittites and call themselves by the Hittites, a problem with the official historical version. Where geographically Hittites, and where the Circassians? At what time of the Hittites lived, and when there were Circassians? What do they overlap? So can ask us questions scientists hettologi. And then do they say, “The Circassians Hittites can not be!”. Because none of the discoverers of the Hittites, whose works are the basis of knowledge of this ancient people were not aware of the phrase “Het zhegyIe,” and still occuring at the Circassians.Hettologiya otherwise probably would have gone a different way. It turns out this discrepancy, this little phrase, being taken into account, can change the existing concept and give rise to completely revise the Hittite perspective! Now, in the current concept of a single thread linking the Circassians and the Hittite power, is the thesis that the language of the inhabitants of pre-Indo-Malaya Asia – Hutt similar in structure and vocabulary of the languages ​​of the Abkhaz-Adyghe (Circassian, Ubykh, Abaza, Abkhaz). But this “thin thread” science is not interested and does not develop it. Let us now take some scientific texts and identify them on the Hittites, and subject the thing in question. Let’s start with the big terminological confusion that exists regarding the Hittites. This confusion is one of the main reasons as to who the Hittites. So: 1. Hittites science calls the people who spoke an Indo-European language, which appeared from nowhere in the Land of Hatti. He gradually over several centuries colonized the country and became co-exist with the local indigenous population – the Hutts. 2. Hittites science also refers to the people, formed as a result of a long cohabitation and mixing with the local Indo-European aliens aboriginal population – not Indo Hutts. In general, the Hittites called all the inhabitants of the Hittite state. 3. Hittites called the people who lived in small kingdoms – the ruins of the once-powerful Hittite power scattered throughout Anatolia after the fall of the empire. 4. “Protohettami” science calls the people who lived in Asia Minor before the Indo-Europeans began to appear there. Self-designation of the indigenous population were the Hittites and Hatti, – depending on the dialect pronunciation. And they came to the land called Indo-Europeans themselves – nesity. Also in science says that “protohetty” had a mature civilization at the time of occurrence of the first nesitov. Between the “Hittites”-Indo-Europeans and “protohettami” – there is no genetic or ethnic ties, although the term “proto-” implies it. 5. The Bible calls the Hittites, heteyanami, Hittites all the people mentioned in the above paragraphs. Actually thanks to this book all the first time and learned about the existence of Hittite power in ancient times. 6. In ordinary consciousness of those who have heard at least something about the Hittites, and to popularize the representation deliberately primitivized modern scientific exposition, the Hittites – is the first in the history of Indo-Europeans who conquered Asia Minor and prevailed in those lands. They are pioneers in the iron and competitors of ancient Egypt, who built a great civilization. contradictions hidden in terminology and the terminology is the basis of the proper filing of the information. Terminology – a conditional language, and if there are contradictions, in the knowledge there is confusion. With regard to our definition, if the information in paragraph 1 to take the number as correct or true definition of the term, the information in paragraph number 2 and number 3 – turns out not true, not accurate. If we assume that the correct information set out in paragraph number 2, we now have other items in error. In any case, the term – “protohetty” specified in paragraph number 4, is initially not true – it is not competent definition. You can not use a prefix – “proto-” where there is no consistent genetic and ethnic ties. Due to this whole mess, and formed a scientific statement contained in paragraph number 6 – primitivized and popularized the concept of the Hittites. That’s one of the samples of such notions: “But the Hittites continued to ask riddles. And the chief was yet to come – in fact Hittite was an Indo-European language! This entailed another problem: the means and the people were Indo-European … “(Volkov, N. Forgetful.” Hittites. Unknown empire in Asia Minor “). As can be countered this mess and rather primitive ideas? That in addition to the phrase “Het zhegyIe!”, There is still the Circassians? And there is still much that is stored in the traditions of the Circassian people in the songs, in language, rituals, knowledge about ourselves. Scientific expedition to collect vintage songs Circassians in the 30 years of the twentieth century, has found the song on bzhedugskom dialect Circassians. We present here the lyrics translated into the Russian language: “The Hittites our grandfathers, the ancient tribe are, legendary belief. Hittite kingdom great for large sea lies, becoming famous, is expanding. His border to Egypt brought the Hittites, Ramses – King of Egypt Unhappy with this war begins. The Hittites their knowledge in all aspects of bringing governor of Egypt – Pharaoh Ramses comes to the Hittites, the Agreement concluded together. Both sides were related … ” As they say – no comment … There are examples of linguistic and Abkhaz language, which are related to the Circassian. In the vernacular of the Abkhaz There is one very interesting expression. When the Abkhaz want to say the phrase, “Mother Tongue”, he says: “A-Ha Tay byzshaa”, which literally translated into Russian, as: – “Hutt language.” In addition, all of the Circassian dialects to ask the man – “who are you?”, You say, ‘ue uhet? “, Which literally translated -” you Hittite? “That is, in the semantic meaning:” you own? ” “You is ours.”At the Circassians and today are fairly common names with the root “huts”, which are conserved Hittite past – Khatko (Hetykue) Hatyzh (Hetyzh) Atazhukin (Hetezhykue), as well as the names – Hetu, Hete, Hetyze etc.; also one of the Circassian Peoples called – hatukaytsy. All this is knowledge of the Circassian people of its glorious past, of itself, so they are closer to the truth to common sense. Are robust and scientists such statements: “On the other side of science are also established undeniable traits of kinship of the Caucasian languages ​​with some now dead languages ​​of the Near East, in particular protohettskih language. This last, as it turns out, is particularly close to the Abkhaz-Adyghe languages, in particular Ubykh. ” Talking about the relationship “protohettskih” language with Adyghe-Abkhaz GAMelikishvili G. writes: “The use of prefixes as morphological elements, as well as many other effects of morphological structure of the language actually brings him to the highlanders Caucasian languages ​​(Ubykh, Circassian, Abazinian). ST Eremyan also classifies ancient Abkhazian-Circassian tribes to protohettskih ethnic world. “According to the famous Russian author Alexander aces, “protohetty” Hatta and historical Atlanteans – they are different names for one and the same people. The author writes: “So, defined the location of Atlantis – a real country Dardanovogo killed in the flood. Inhabited this country highly developed nation – Atlanta, more Hutts, protohetty.Atlantean culture has had a huge impact on the culture of the surrounding nations, including the Slav. ” . need to pay attention to the following. As described above, and Science and the Bible, and the usual popularized the view is called the Hittites different “subjects”, thereby contradicting one another. And they do not know for certain which of these “entities” referred to himself as the Hittites. On the other side of the Circassians Hittites no one calls, but they call themselves, and see themselves as descendants of the ancient people of this particular. Why there was such confusion in terms of why the Indo-European component of the knowledge of the Hittites came to the fore, and “protohettskih” component remains in the shade and accordingly the value of the Circassians and their knowledge of it are invisible, and even unknown to science? After all, no doubt, and it shows, as they say, to the naked eye, that the knowledge of the Hittites, as well as their own country and their history is made ​​up of two components – neindoevropeyskoy and Indo-European. first cause confusion and the fact that, in modern terms, an Indo-European component has a greater “public relations”, that the discoverers of the Hittites – the Europeans themselves. So that they attach great importance to “own” the Indo-European component – is completely natural. The second reason – it is, of course, is that the very discovery of the civilization of the Hittites, and deciphering texts took place in the late XIX – early XX centuries. – That is, in the heyday – “Indo-European ideas.” Then science behaved like this: find a cart, which once ran past the so-called “Indo-European” and immediately Science stated: “This is our cart!”, Thus, never noticing that in the cart, then sat two Africans. .. Science, which itself is Indo-European, by definition, opening the Hittites, Indo-Europeans called them. It was a powerful civilization, a rival of Egypt, the discoverer of iron, and the temptation to call it the first Indo-European civilization was very large. Especially cuneiform tablets were found on a hitherto unknown Indo-European language. So firmly established opinion: the Hittites – this is the first Indo-Europeans, who built a civilization equal to ancient Egypt, and so on … Huttese primordial element has been left in the shadows, although he now lies on the surface, but this topic is now almost do not work out. If you develop it, the Indo-European component will lose a lot.Here are some details that lie on the surface, but in the “shadow”: 1. Prior to Asia Minor began to appear Indo-Europeans – there was already a highly developed civilization, and strangers to it did not add anything significant. We can say that they have come to a ready-made. The fact that came to Asia Minor, Indo-Europeans were below the level of culture – also known. 2. The aliens have not won territory Hatti – for centuries they gradually settled and assimilated among the local population. 3. The pivotal element of culture, and the main control – it is a religion. It has remained the same as before the Indo-European language of the sacred ritual was pre-Indo – Hutt. Even the name of the gods remained Hutt. 4. And the Caucasian country Ashuyya and Maikop culture, and the Hittite empire – all links in a continuous chain. Hittites consider separately – it’s just not seeing the whole historical picture as a whole. After all, Country Hattie was not an island of civilization, and was part of a larger one world along the southern and eastern coast of the Black Sea, albeit with separate centers, but with the kindred tribes. 5. There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans at least somewhat dominated in the Land of Hatti. Either in politics or in culture or in religion, they do not sway. Even the situation is somewhat the opposite. It is known that most of the kings wore Hutt, not Indo-European names. Religion has not changed under the influence of newcomers. And the quote is another fact: “The merger of the Indo-Europeans with native tribes in the Hutt Central Asia Minor formed Hittite ethnic group, who created around the middle of the XVIII century. BC. e. powerful Hittite state, fully embrace the rich cultural traditions of the Hutt “(GG Giorgadze.” Ancient History “, 1989). 6. Hittites called themselves, not Indo-Europeans, and the Hutts – and now continue to call themselves Circassians. However, I might say, why then Hutt language in the Land of Hatti was dead, preserved only in religious texts and rituals, and became the Indo-European language of the proceedings, diplomacy Hetskom tsarstve.I is it really? This question is answered scientist Gordon Childe, in his book “Aryans – the founders of European civilization”: “First of all, the material that we have at our disposal, and this plate from the state archives of Hittite kings in Boghazkoy reflects only the language in which the said the Hittites in Cappadocia, and on this basis it is impossible to draw any conclusions regarding the other “Hittites”, for example, those who lived in Carchemish in northern Syria. Moreover, now it is clear that even in Cappadocia, there was a large number of languages: Pali, Mitanni and protohettskih. On the latter should pay particular attention, as he left behind their own written records. There is no doubt that the “Hittites” can not be attributed to a number of Indo-Europeans. Another thing dialect, which themselves scribes called “our language”, no doubt experienced the Indo-European influence. ” It is a pity of course that Gordon Childe did not know that the Circassians have an expression – “Be Hett!” – this would make it even more convinced in correctness of his conclusions. Sam Hutt language, of course, refers to a group of Adygea abhazzskoy-Caucasian language family, and as complex as the Circassian Ubykh, Abkhazian languages ​​.. Many native language Hutt could move to a simpler Indo-European language, especially in the field of public administration. Similar examples in the history of the Circassians were later – Circassian Mamluk sultans, ruled an empire in Arabic. A modern Circassians in Turkey have moved into Turkish, to both the public and easier language than their mother tongue. Apparently, this happened in the Land of Hatti, where more than a simple Indo-European language has spread rapidly multiethnic empire as more acceptable as an international and local Hutt complex language remained as a spoken language and the sacred. Otherwise, as modern scientists say if hatsky language completely disappeared back in those days, remaining only in religious texts, and became a dead language, then how to have survived the phrase – “Het zhegyIe!”?To answer this question, we need to show the contradictions that exist in science – hettologii. To do this, we present a table in which the left-hand side – well-established scientific or become popular theses (red font), and the right part of the – counter or knowledge of the Circassian people about themselves (blue): 1. The Hittites – Indo-Europeans. 1. Yes, indeed, among the ethnic group, called “Hittites”, was a significant Indo-European com-ponents. Indo-Europeans but they did not call themselves – “Hittite.” This exonym by the name of the country, the inhabitants of which they were, and that existed before them. Hittites called themselves natives – Hatta (“protohetty”). And now in the modern world by the Hittites called themselves Circassians. 2. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, the creators of advanced civilization and powers equal to ancient Egypt. 2. Civilization Hutt existed long before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor. 3.Anitas king – the first king of the Hittites 3. And to Anitas in the Land of Hatti kings were, however, Anitas first king caught in the record which read our contemporaries scientists. It is a mistake to begin with Anitas history of the Hittites. 4. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans – the discoverers of iron. 4. Iron was known Hutts before the Indo-Europeans came to Central Asia Minor. This is indicated by the message of Pharaoh king of Hatti with a request to send him an iron dagger. The message is dated 2000 BC. e. 5. -Indo-European Hittites ruled Asia Minor from 1750 to 1200 years BC 5.There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans were somewhat dominated the rest of the population of the country of Hatti. Rather the reverse: most famous kings wore Hutt names. 6. The Indo-Europeans conquered Asia Minor and established the Empire. 6. In the literature, many times repeated, that the conquest was not, and there was a gradual settlement of the Indo-Europeans in the Land of Hatti, and integration. From the above we can draw the following conclusions: 1. Necessary to create a science Circassian Abhazalogii to live with the position of the fragments of an ancient civilization – Cherkess (Circassians), Ubykhs the Abaza, Abkhaz to reconsider the knowledge of the Hittites, the country Ashuyya, ancient Mesopotamia, the Maikop culture, not separately, but in unity. It also requires knowledge of the languages ​​and dialects of all these Caucasian peoples. 2. The opening of which John Kolaruso reported in 2011 (details in a later chapter), once again confirms that the future Europeans and future Circassians in the past for a long time been in interaction with each other. 3. There is a popular belief about the Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, who created the Hittite power does not hold water. We can only speak Otomi that the country of Hatti, there is some component of the Indo-European. At the same backbone political model – Confederation controlled by a single ruler, and in fact has a socialist system of government – that is nonsense for the Ancient World, remained. 4. The only pieces of Hatti Countries that existed before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor – it’s Circassians and Abkhazians. And for them, “Hittite” – an ancient self. 5. History of the Hittites did not have a gap between the XII and XVIII centuries. BC. e. This is exactly the time when the Europeans future and the future of the Circassians, Abkhazians coexisted within the same public education. It was during this period of time the Europeans borrowed from the future of the future of the Circassians, Abkhaz culture, which became the basis of European civilization, not to mention the genes which, according to the latest findings, in large enough quantities is among the Europeans. 6. History in the case of the Hittites once again shows its bias and clumsiness, and the “authority” prodavlivaya “best” ideas, and being by definition the “Indo-European” – pulls the blanket over himself. Now I want to give an interesting example of the Bible in the Hittite subject. It is the story of perhaps the most famous of the Hittites – Uriah Hettiyanine. This character of the Old Testament was in the list of the best soldiers of the governor of the state of Israel – King David. It tells about 11 head of the 2nd Book of Kings. All who read the Old Testament, remember this story. The act of Uriah the Hittite is completely separate from the other acts and the acts described in the Bible. What is the difference? You might ask. The difference in motivation. Bible is full of stories about the various exploits, deeds, deeds. They are committed in the name of faith, the Lord of kings, women, brothers. There were acts committed because of lust for power, greed, and the other was the cause of meanness, selfishness, etc. There were, of course, act in the name of love and compassion. That is, in each case has its own motive. And Uriah act is fundamentally different from all the others, described in the Old Testament, it was his motivation. Let’s remember how it was. Uriah the Hittite, refuses to go home to sleep with his wife, thereby violating the order of their king – David. David himself so wanted to hide the cause of his wife’s pregnancy Uriah – Bathsheba.Pregnancy, as we learn from the same story, came from the fact that at the time, as long as Uriah was at war, King David’s wife forced him to close and she suffered from it. If Uriah at least one night spent at home, it would be possible to justify pregnancy Beersheba. So King David through cunning attempts to send Uriah home to spend the night. And Uriah refuses to go home at night, although it is an order of the king, and, as we know the word gentleman – the law for his servants. But no, Uriah did not go home and spend the night at the gate of the palace, along with security. He did not comply with an order of the king, and should any of its own internal installation. And this set is stronger than the word of a king, though the king’s word, and the law for his servants. At the very same King David about this setup is not even know, or he would have chosen a different tactical trick against Uriah. Some kind of ethical standard, unknown to King David and the other Israelis, Uriah does not allow to execute the order of the king. Any other warrior in place of Uriah, who came from the war, and who had not seen for a long time my wife would love to obey the order of the king, without even thinking. But not the Hittite. He is the king says, “… and my lord Joab and the servants of my lord are in the field, and I went to his house to eat and drink, and sleep with my wife? I swear by thy life and the life of your soul, I will not do! “This behavior says that Uriah the Hittite is subject to ethical standards that at a later time, known as the Circassians -” zekIue habze “- the unwritten law of marching. It is part of the Circassian ethics – Adyghe Khabza. During the raid, campaign, war, every soldier obeys the “zekIue habze.” The fundamental principle of the law marching sounds like this: “The interests of the group (party, army detachment) is always more important than the interests of any single voina.Ni separately taken warrior can not have any privileges and benefits as opposed to the other before the end of the campaign (war, the raid) . Other important principles of this Code are as follows: “To leave the battlefield for any reason, except for tactical reasons, leaving the other – means to cover their name and shame their children forever” “The commander elected only during the campaign, and only by their personal qualities.” “Commander leaves last battlefield. ” ‘surrender – the biggest disgrace. ” These principles and requirements remained the Circassians in their military culture until the end of the XIX century. And in the understanding of Uriah – to go to bed with his wife at the time, when his combat comrades in the field, it equates to flee from the battlefield. Such an understanding in principle characteristic of Hittite. The only possible way out for himself, he sees – to spend the night with the same soldiers like himself, to the protection of the palace, with soldiers who are directly in the line of military obyazonnostey. Thus, Uriah creates for himself the situation in which he can consider himself not run away from the battlefield. King David was re-invited me Uriah the next day and “eating with him and drank, and he made ​​him drunk.” King hoped that Uriah drunk certainly will spend the night home to his wife. However, it is not, is not, – sleeps with security at the gate of the palace.Even napivshiysya Uriah did not violate its internal charter. It must be emphasized that no one ever would have blamed him if he slept at home. Only his inner principle and military upbringing, his conscience and his judge. It is this military principle, unknown to the Israelis would not allow the will of the king of Uriah. If you say that this is not surprising, such a principle would not only be from the Hittites and the Circassians you would be wrong, because the Jews of this is not known, it is very clear from the biblical story. seems that Uriah repeatedly said senior “Het zhegyIe” – “Be Hett!” – that is, “to multiply the glory of the Hittites!”. And he actually went on and increase in the millennium. Uriah the Hittite – the symbol of this military honor. The honor cost him his life. Uriah name a few times in the history of the Circassians, and probably in the pre-Christian Circassia was quite common. 1. From the ancient inscriptions known – Ware Hetu – full namesake of Uriah the Hittite, of which four thousand years ago wrote an Assyrian king Narasmin. This inscription is carved in stone. Says that of the Western Caucasus thousand years ago came under the leadership of the Hutts Ware Hetu and captured the city of Akkad, and built a city Carchemish and Thapsek. 2. Ueri Dade – the so-called leader Kasogs (ancestors of the Circassians), who fought a duel with the Russian Tmutarakan Prince Mstislav in 1022 in the Russian chronicles the name sounds like – “Rededi.” 3. Ueri Dade – the so-called People’s Court judge, in a story about a wise man Zhabagiev cauldron. Ueri Zhabagiev was the forerunner of the People’s Court. In all cases, except for the story about the judge, the name of Uriah are soldiers – unit commanders. Perhaps this is a military post, or some kind of nickname given to colleagues for military merit, because in Circassian: “Uerra!” – Forward! “Ware” – a war, a war.”Uerubyd” – a prisoner of war. “Uerysh” – Warhorse . “Uerk” – a professional soldier, officer. (The letter “E” in the Circassian language-A short beep) Apparently, the English word – “war” and the Bulgarian – “Thief” – derived from this ancient root .. Wife Uriah the Hittite, which later became the wife of King David and King Solomon’s mother, was called – Bathsheba that twisted like – Bathsheba. “Baie-it-schabe” in the language of the Circassians read: Baie many IT “containing” Schabe, “gentle.” Just-“tender”. As the name for a girl in today’s Circassian world, the name of the organic and reminiscent of the Circassian names such as – NefIytsIe – “black-eyed” Pague – “snub” Naschhue – “gray-eyed”, Schabe – “soft, tender”. The name of her grandfather – Ahithophel. This name contains three Circassian roots: “het” – Hittite, “fe” – appearance, form and “lly” – man. “A” – is common in the Abkhaz-Adyghe language group prefix pointing to a specific object specifying affix. Linguists are trying to translate the name from the Hebrew, the result is – “brother of madness.” Agree, not the most appropriate name for the adviser of King David and indeed the name allogichno for any nation. dominant in science – is the fruit of the labor of some of the outstanding scientist, authority in this area of ​​expertise. Someone dared to revise his opinion, must complete at least years – 40-50 after the death of that luminary of science. And then someone will say that this scientist was wrong, or say that this concept should be reviewed. We can say that historical science is slowly “goes” on the “authorities” that her train slowly creeping up the hill. There is another reason for the slowness and conservatism. The fact that many scientists have made ​​their careers by now well-established concepts and move them virtually impossible. To this can be added the fact that the state formation, religious and political organizations as well as national and nationalist, practicing or promoting a certain ideology, are contributing to the “noble cause” rewriting history. Thus, the line up “favorable” and “digestible” versions of historical concepts. All of this ultimately gives biased science. discovering something new, science proceeds as follows – look, fit this new fact in the current orderly scheme, the “right” ideology and politics. If the fit – great! You can congratulate the opening of confirming the discovery of the past. And if you can not understand or, even worse for the discoverer, – destroys the existing opinion? Then leave while unattended and push in the “back burner” until better times. One such amazing and indigestible to the facts of science is a phrase that exists among the Circassians as a figure of speech, such as sustainable phrase: “Het zhegyIe!”, which translated into Russian means – “Be Hett». A detailed interpretation of the meaning: “Behave yourself so that you talked about: he – Hittite.” This phrase is also hidden emotional appeal “to multiply and continue the glory of the Hittites!”. This phrase is now actively used in everyday speech, the Circassians, it is – the current live the phrase used by the people. Usually it says senior years younger naputstvuya or instructing. For example, watching the road, in the army, to school, to the competition. should also pay attention to the fact that in the phrase, “Be Hett!” no value or meaning, which would be expressed in the phrase, “Be like or similar Hetty” or same “imitate Hetty.” It calls not to try to be like the Hittite, and it is not to forget that you Hittite. That is the kind of person who utters this expression, considers himself and the person to whom it is said – the Hittites. On this basis, it is clear and understandable, that we are dealing with the archaic self-designation of the Circassians. This is evidenced by the common sense, because it is logical, for example, that the Russian might say to his younger – “Do not forget that you are Russian,” but unlikely to say – “Do not forget that you are a Pole!”. The Chinese say this: “whether the Chinese!” But in any case will not call his younger-be Japanese. Circassians consider themselves Hittites called themselves the Hittites, and in this capacious phrase tremendous emotional content – the pride of ethnic belonging and pride historical.In this phrase, apart from the direct sense, founded and still call – and continue to increase the glory of the Hittites. And that’s what the Circassians consider themselves Hittites and call themselves by the Hittites, a problem with the official historical version. Where geographically Hittites, and where the Circassians? At what time of the Hittites lived, and when there were Circassians? What do they overlap? So can ask us questions scientists hettologi. And then do they say, “The Circassians Hittites can not be!”. Because none of the discoverers of the Hittites, whose works are the basis of knowledge of this ancient people were not aware of the phrase “Het zhegyIe,” and still occuring at the Circassians.Hettologiya otherwise probably would have gone a different way. It turns out this discrepancy, this little phrase, being taken into account, can change the existing concept and give rise to completely revise the Hittite perspective! Now, in the current concept of a single thread linking the Circassians and the Hittite power, is the thesis that the language of the inhabitants of pre-Indo-Malaya Asia – Hutt similar in structure and vocabulary of the languages ​​of the Abkhaz-Adyghe (Circassian, Ubykh, Abaza, Abkhaz). But this “thin thread” science is not interested and does not develop it. Let us now take some scientific texts and identify them on the Hittites, and subject the thing in question. Let’s start with the big terminological confusion that exists regarding the Hittites. This confusion is one of the main reasons as to who the Hittites. So: 1. Hittites science calls the people who spoke an Indo-European language, which appeared from nowhere in the Land of Hatti. He gradually over several centuries colonized the country and became co-exist with the local indigenous population – the Hutts. 2. Hittites science also refers to the people, formed as a result of a long cohabitation and mixing with the local Indo-European aliens aboriginal population – not Indo Hutts. In general, the Hittites called all the inhabitants of the Hittite state. 3. Hittites called the people who lived in small kingdoms – the ruins of the once-powerful Hittite power scattered throughout Anatolia after the fall of the empire. 4. “Protohettami” science calls the people who lived in Asia Minor before the Indo-Europeans began to appear there. Self-designation of the indigenous population were the Hittites and Hatti, – depending on the dialect pronunciation. And they came to the land called Indo-Europeans themselves – nesity. Also in science says that “protohetty” had a mature civilization at the time of occurrence of the first nesitov. Between the “Hittites”-Indo-Europeans and “protohettami” – there is no genetic or ethnic ties, although the term “proto-” implies it. 5. The Bible calls the Hittites, heteyanami, Hittites all the people mentioned in the above paragraphs. Actually thanks to this book all the first time and learned about the existence of Hittite power in ancient times. 6. In ordinary consciousness of those who have heard at least something about the Hittites, and to popularize the representation deliberately primitivized modern scientific exposition, the Hittites – is the first in the history of Indo-Europeans who conquered Asia Minor and prevailed in those lands. They are pioneers in the iron and competitors of ancient Egypt, who built a great civilization. contradictions hidden in terminology and the terminology is the basis of the proper filing of the information. Terminology – a conditional language, and if there are contradictions, in the knowledge there is confusion. With regard to our definition, if the information in paragraph 1 to take the number as correct or true definition of the term, the information in paragraph number 2 and number 3 – turns out not true, not accurate. If we assume that the correct information set out in paragraph number 2, we now have other items in error. In any case, the term – “protohetty” specified in paragraph number 4, is initially not true – it is not competent definition. You can not use a prefix – “proto-” where there is no consistent genetic and ethnic ties. Due to this whole mess, and formed a scientific statement contained in paragraph number 6 – primitivized and popularized the concept of the Hittites. That’s one of the samples of such notions: “But the Hittites continued to ask riddles. And the chief was yet to come – in fact Hittite was an Indo-European language! This entailed another problem: the means and the people were Indo-European … “(Volkov, N. Forgetful.” Hittites. Unknown empire in Asia Minor “). As can be countered this mess and rather primitive ideas? That in addition to the phrase “Het zhegyIe!”, There is still the Circassians? And there is still much that is stored in the traditions of the Circassian people in the songs, in language, rituals, knowledge about ourselves. Scientific expedition to collect vintage songs Circassians in the 30 years of the twentieth century, has found the song on bzhedugskom dialect Circassians. We present here the lyrics translated into the Russian language: “The Hittites our grandfathers, the ancient tribe are, legendary belief. Hittite kingdom great for large sea lies, becoming famous, is expanding. His border to Egypt brought the Hittites, Ramses – King of Egypt Unhappy with this war begins. The Hittites their knowledge in all aspects of bringing governor of Egypt – Pharaoh Ramses comes to the Hittites, the Agreement concluded together. Both sides were related … ” As they say – no comment … There are examples of linguistic and Abkhaz language, which are related to the Circassian. In the vernacular of the Abkhaz There is one very interesting expression. When the Abkhaz want to say the phrase, “Mother Tongue”, he says: “A-Ha Tay byzshaa”, which literally translated into Russian, as: – “Hutt language.” In addition, all of the Circassian dialects to ask the man – “who are you?”, You say, ‘ue uhet? “, Which literally translated -” you Hittite? “That is, in the semantic meaning:” you own? ” “You is ours.”At the Circassians and today are fairly common names with the root “huts”, which are conserved Hittite past – Khatko (Hetykue) Hatyzh (Hetyzh) Atazhukin (Hetezhykue), as well as the names – Hetu, Hete, Hetyze etc.; also one of the Circassian Peoples called – hatukaytsy. All this is knowledge of the Circassian people of its glorious past, of itself, so they are closer to the truth to common sense. Are robust and scientists such statements: “On the other side of science are also established undeniable traits of kinship of the Caucasian languages ​​with some now dead languages ​​of the Near East, in particular protohettskih language. This last, as it turns out, is particularly close to the Abkhaz-Adyghe languages, in particular Ubykh. ” Talking about the relationship “protohettskih” language with Adyghe-Abkhaz GAMelikishvili G. writes: “The use of prefixes as morphological elements, as well as many other effects of morphological structure of the language actually brings him to the highlanders Caucasian languages ​​(Ubykh, Circassian, Abazinian). ST Eremyan also classifies ancient Abkhazian-Circassian tribes to protohettskih ethnic world. “According to the famous Russian author Alexander aces, “protohetty” Hatta and historical Atlanteans – they are different names for one and the same people. The author writes: “So, defined the location of Atlantis – a real country Dardanovogo killed in the flood. Inhabited this country highly developed nation – Atlanta, more Hutts, protohetty.Atlantean culture has had a huge impact on the culture of the surrounding nations, including the Slav. ” . need to pay attention to the following. As described above, and Science and the Bible, and the usual popularized the view is called the Hittites different “subjects”, thereby contradicting one another. And they do not know for certain which of these “entities” referred to himself as the Hittites. On the other side of the Circassians Hittites no one calls, but they call themselves, and see themselves as descendants of the ancient people of this particular. Why there was such confusion in terms of why the Indo-European component of the knowledge of the Hittites came to the fore, and “protohettskih” component remains in the shade and accordingly the value of the Circassians and their knowledge of it are invisible, and even unknown to science? After all, no doubt, and it shows, as they say, to the naked eye, that the knowledge of the Hittites, as well as their own country and their history is made ​​up of two components – neindoevropeyskoy and Indo-European. first cause confusion and the fact that, in modern terms, an Indo-European component has a greater “public relations”, that the discoverers of the Hittites – the Europeans themselves. So that they attach great importance to “own” the Indo-European component – is completely natural. The second reason – it is, of course, is that the very discovery of the civilization of the Hittites, and deciphering texts took place in the late XIX – early XX centuries. – That is, in the heyday – “Indo-European ideas.” Then science behaved like this: find a cart, which once ran past the so-called “Indo-European” and immediately Science stated: “This is our cart!”, Thus, never noticing that in the cart, then sat two Africans. .. Science, which itself is Indo-European, by definition, opening the Hittites, Indo-Europeans called them. It was a powerful civilization, a rival of Egypt, the discoverer of iron, and the temptation to call it the first Indo-European civilization was very large. Especially cuneiform tablets were found on a hitherto unknown Indo-European language. So firmly established opinion: the Hittites – this is the first Indo-Europeans, who built a civilization equal to ancient Egypt, and so on … Huttese primordial element has been left in the shadows, although he now lies on the surface, but this topic is now almost do not work out. If you develop it, the Indo-European component will lose a lot.Here are some details that lie on the surface, but in the “shadow”: 1. Prior to Asia Minor began to appear Indo-Europeans – there was already a highly developed civilization, and strangers to it did not add anything significant. We can say that they have come to a ready-made. The fact that came to Asia Minor, Indo-Europeans were below the level of culture – also known. 2. The aliens have not won territory Hatti – for centuries they gradually settled and assimilated among the local population. 3. The pivotal element of culture, and the main control – it is a religion. It has remained the same as before the Indo-European language of the sacred ritual was pre-Indo – Hutt. Even the name of the gods remained Hutt. 4. And the Caucasian country Ashuyya and Maikop culture, and the Hittite empire – all links in a continuous chain. Hittites consider separately – it’s just not seeing the whole historical picture as a whole. After all, Country Hattie was not an island of civilization, and was part of a larger one world along the southern and eastern coast of the Black Sea, albeit with separate centers, but with the kindred tribes. 5. There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans at least somewhat dominated in the Land of Hatti. Either in politics or in culture or in religion, they do not sway. Even the situation is somewhat the opposite. It is known that most of the kings wore Hutt, not Indo-European names. Religion has not changed under the influence of newcomers. And the quote is another fact: “The merger of the Indo-Europeans with native tribes in the Hutt Central Asia Minor formed Hittite ethnic group, who created around the middle of the XVIII century. BC. e. powerful Hittite state, fully embrace the rich cultural traditions of the Hutt “(GG Giorgadze.” Ancient History “, 1989). 6. Hittites called themselves, not Indo-Europeans, and the Hutts – and now continue to call themselves Circassians. However, I might say, why then Hutt language in the Land of Hatti was dead, preserved only in religious texts and rituals, and became the Indo-European language of the proceedings, diplomacy Hetskom tsarstve.I is it really? This question is answered scientist Gordon Childe, in his book “Aryans – the founders of European civilization”: “First of all, the material that we have at our disposal, and this plate from the state archives of Hittite kings in Boghazkoy reflects only the language in which the said the Hittites in Cappadocia, and on this basis it is impossible to draw any conclusions regarding the other “Hittites”, for example, those who lived in Carchemish in northern Syria. Moreover, now it is clear that even in Cappadocia, there was a large number of languages: Pali, Mitanni and protohettskih. On the latter should pay particular attention, as he left behind their own written records. There is no doubt that the “Hittites” can not be attributed to a number of Indo-Europeans. Another thing dialect, which themselves scribes called “our language”, no doubt experienced the Indo-European influence. ” It is a pity of course that Gordon Childe did not know that the Circassians have an expression – “Be Hett!” – this would make it even more convinced in correctness of his conclusions. Sam Hutt language, of course, refers to a group of Adygea abhazzskoy-Caucasian language family, and as complex as the Circassian Ubykh, Abkhazian languages ​​.. Many native language Hutt could move to a simpler Indo-European language, especially in the field of public administration. Similar examples in the history of the Circassians were later – Circassian Mamluk sultans, ruled an empire in Arabic. A modern Circassians in Turkey have moved into Turkish, to both the public and easier language than their mother tongue. Apparently, this happened in the Land of Hatti, where more than a simple Indo-European language has spread rapidly multiethnic empire as more acceptable as an international and local Hutt complex language remained as a spoken language and the sacred. Otherwise, as modern scientists say if hatsky language completely disappeared back in those days, remaining only in religious texts, and became a dead language, then how to have survived the phrase – “Het zhegyIe!”?To answer this question, we need to show the contradictions that exist in science – hettologii. To do this, we present a table in which the left-hand side – well-established scientific or become popular theses (red font), and the right part of the – counter or knowledge of the Circassian people about themselves (blue): 1. The Hittites – Indo-Europeans. 1. Yes, indeed, among the ethnic group, called “Hittites”, was a significant Indo-European com-ponents. Indo-Europeans but they did not call themselves – “Hittite.” This exonym by the name of the country, the inhabitants of which they were, and that existed before them. Hittites called themselves natives – Hatta (“protohetty”). And now in the modern world by the Hittites called themselves Circassians. 2. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, the creators of advanced civilization and powers equal to ancient Egypt. 2. Civilization Hutt existed long before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor. 3.Anitas king – the first king of the Hittites 3. And to Anitas in the Land of Hatti kings were, however, Anitas first king caught in the record which read our contemporaries scientists. It is a mistake to begin with Anitas history of the Hittites. 4. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans – the discoverers of iron. 4. Iron was known Hutts before the Indo-Europeans came to Central Asia Minor. This is indicated by the message of Pharaoh king of Hatti with a request to send him an iron dagger. The message is dated 2000 BC. e. 5. -Indo-European Hittites ruled Asia Minor from 1750 to 1200 years BC 5.There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans were somewhat dominated the rest of the population of the country of Hatti. Rather the reverse: most famous kings wore Hutt names. 6. The Indo-Europeans conquered Asia Minor and established the Empire. 6. In the literature, many times repeated, that the conquest was not, and there was a gradual settlement of the Indo-Europeans in the Land of Hatti, and integration. From the above we can draw the following conclusions: 1. Necessary to create a science Circassian Abhazalogii to live with the position of the fragments of an ancient civilization – Cherkess (Circassians), Ubykhs the Abaza, Abkhaz to reconsider the knowledge of the Hittites, the country Ashuyya, ancient Mesopotamia, the Maikop culture, not separately, but in unity. It also requires knowledge of the languages ​​and dialects of all these Caucasian peoples. 2. The opening of which John Kolaruso reported in 2011 (details in a later chapter), once again confirms that the future Europeans and future Circassians in the past for a long time been in interaction with each other. 3. There is a popular belief about the Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, who created the Hittite power does not hold water. We can only speak Otomi that the country of Hatti, there is some component of the Indo-European. At the same backbone political model – Confederation controlled by a single ruler, and in fact has a socialist system of government – that is nonsense for the Ancient World, remained. 4. The only pieces of Hatti Countries that existed before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor – it’s Circassians and Abkhazians. And for them, “Hittite” – an ancient self. 5. History of the Hittites did not have a gap between the XII and XVIII centuries. BC. e. This is exactly the time when the Europeans future and the future of the Circassians, Abkhazians coexisted within the same public education. It was during this period of time the Europeans borrowed from the future of the future of the Circassians, Abkhaz culture, which became the basis of European civilization, not to mention the genes which, according to the latest findings, in large enough quantities is among the Europeans. 6. History in the case of the Hittites once again shows its bias and clumsiness, and the “authority” prodavlivaya “best” ideas, and being by definition the “Indo-European” – pulls the blanket over himself. Now I want to give an interesting example of the Bible in the Hittite subject. It is the story of perhaps the most famous of the Hittites – Uriah Hettiyanine. This character of the Old Testament was in the list of the best soldiers of the governor of the state of Israel – King David. It tells about 11 head of the 2nd Book of Kings. All who read the Old Testament, remember this story. The act of Uriah the Hittite is completely separate from the other acts and the acts described in the Bible. What is the difference? You might ask. The difference in motivation. Bible is full of stories about the various exploits, deeds, deeds. They are committed in the name of faith, the Lord of kings, women, brothers. There were acts committed because of lust for power, greed, and the other was the cause of meanness, selfishness, etc. There were, of course, act in the name of love and compassion. That is, in each case has its own motive. And Uriah act is fundamentally different from all the others, described in the Old Testament, it was his motivation. Let’s remember how it was. Uriah the Hittite, refuses to go home to sleep with his wife, thereby violating the order of their king – David. David himself so wanted to hide the cause of his wife’s pregnancy Uriah – Bathsheba.Pregnancy, as we learn from the same story, came from the fact that at the time, as long as Uriah was at war, King David’s wife forced him to close and she suffered from it. If Uriah at least one night spent at home, it would be possible to justify pregnancy Beersheba. So King David through cunning attempts to send Uriah home to spend the night. And Uriah refuses to go home at night, although it is an order of the king, and, as we know the word gentleman – the law for his servants. But no, Uriah did not go home and spend the night at the gate of the palace, along with security. He did not comply with an order of the king, and should any of its own internal installation. And this set is stronger than the word of a king, though the king’s word, and the law for his servants. At the very same King David about this setup is not even know, or he would have chosen a different tactical trick against Uriah. Some kind of ethical standard, unknown to King David and the other Israelis, Uriah does not allow to execute the order of the king. Any other warrior in place of Uriah, who came from the war, and who had not seen for a long time my wife would love to obey the order of the king, without even thinking. But not the Hittite. He is the king says, “… and my lord Joab and the servants of my lord are in the field, and I went to his house to eat and drink, and sleep with my wife? I swear by thy life and the life of your soul, I will not do! “This behavior says that Uriah the Hittite is subject to ethical standards that at a later time, known as the Circassians -” zekIue habze “- the unwritten law of marching. It is part of the Circassian ethics – Adyghe Khabza. During the raid, campaign, war, every soldier obeys the “zekIue habze.” The fundamental principle of the law marching sounds like this: “The interests of the group (party, army detachment) is always more important than the interests of any single voina.Ni separately taken warrior can not have any privileges and benefits as opposed to the other before the end of the campaign (war, the raid) . Other important principles of this Code are as follows: “To leave the battlefield for any reason, except for tactical reasons, leaving the other – means to cover their name and shame their children forever” “The commander elected only during the campaign, and only by their personal qualities.” “Commander leaves last battlefield. ” ‘surrender – the biggest disgrace. ” These principles and requirements remained the Circassians in their military culture until the end of the XIX century. And in the understanding of Uriah – to go to bed with his wife at the time, when his combat comrades in the field, it equates to flee from the battlefield. Such an understanding in principle characteristic of Hittite. The only possible way out for himself, he sees – to spend the night with the same soldiers like himself, to the protection of the palace, with soldiers who are directly in the line of military obyazonnostey. Thus, Uriah creates for himself the situation in which he can consider himself not run away from the battlefield. King David was re-invited me Uriah the next day and “eating with him and drank, and he made ​​him drunk.” King hoped that Uriah drunk certainly will spend the night home to his wife. However, it is not, is not, – sleeps with security at the gate of the palace.Even napivshiysya Uriah did not violate its internal charter. It must be emphasized that no one ever would have blamed him if he slept at home. Only his inner principle and military upbringing, his conscience and his judge. It is this military principle, unknown to the Israelis would not allow the will of the king of Uriah. If you say that this is not surprising, such a principle would not only be from the Hittites and the Circassians you would be wrong, because the Jews of this is not known, it is very clear from the biblical story. seems that Uriah repeatedly said senior “Het zhegyIe” – “Be Hett!” – that is, “to multiply the glory of the Hittites!”. And he actually went on and increase in the millennium. Uriah the Hittite – the symbol of this military honor. The honor cost him his life. Uriah name a few times in the history of the Circassians, and probably in the pre-Christian Circassia was quite common. 1. From the ancient inscriptions known – Ware Hetu – full namesake of Uriah the Hittite, of which four thousand years ago wrote an Assyrian king Narasmin. This inscription is carved in stone. Says that of the Western Caucasus thousand years ago came under the leadership of the Hutts Ware Hetu and captured the city of Akkad, and built a city Carchemish and Thapsek. 2. Ueri Dade – the so-called leader Kasogs (ancestors of the Circassians), who fought a duel with the Russian Tmutarakan Prince Mstislav in 1022 in the Russian chronicles the name sounds like – “Rededi.” 3. Ueri Dade – the so-called People’s Court judge, in a story about a wise man Zhabagiev cauldron. Ueri Zhabagiev was the forerunner of the People’s Court. In all cases, except for the story about the judge, the name of Uriah are soldiers – unit commanders. Perhaps this is a military post, or some kind of nickname given to colleagues for military merit, because in Circassian: “Uerra!” – Forward! “Ware” – a war, a war.”Uerubyd” – a prisoner of war. “Uerysh” – Warhorse . “Uerk” – a professional soldier, officer. (The letter “E” in the Circassian language-A short beep) Apparently, the English word – “war” and the Bulgarian – “Thief” – derived from this ancient root .. Wife Uriah the Hittite, which later became the wife of King David and King Solomon’s mother, was called – Bathsheba that twisted like – Bathsheba. “Baie-it-schabe” in the language of the Circassians read: Baie many IT “containing” Schabe, “gentle.” Just-“tender”. As the name for a girl in today’s Circassian world, the name of the organic and reminiscent of the Circassian names such as – NefIytsIe – “black-eyed” Pague – “snub” Naschhue – “gray-eyed”, Schabe – “soft, tender”. The name of her grandfather – Ahithophel. This name contains three Circassian roots: “het” – Hittite, “fe” – appearance, form and “lly” – man. “A” – is common in the Abkhaz-Adyghe language group prefix pointing to a specific object specifying affix. Linguists are trying to translate the name from the Hebrew, the result is – “brother of madness.” Agree, not the most appropriate name for the adviser of King David and indeed the name allogichno for any nation. which translated into Russian means – “Be Hett». A detailed interpretation of the meaning: “Behave yourself so that you talked about: he – Hittite.” This phrase is also hidden emotional appeal “to multiply and continue the glory of the Hittites!”. This phrase is now actively used in everyday speech, the Circassians, it is – the current live the phrase used by the people. Usually it says senior years younger naputstvuya or instructing. For example, watching the road, in the army, to school, to the competition. should also pay attention to the fact that in the phrase, “Be Hett!” no value or meaning, which would be expressed in the phrase, “Be like or similar Hetty” or same “imitate Hetty.” It calls not to try to be like the Hittite, and it is not to forget that you Hittite. That is the kind of person who utters this expression, considers himself and the person to whom it is said – the Hittites. On this basis, it is clear and understandable, that we are dealing with the archaic self-designation of the Circassians. This is evidenced by the common sense, because it is logical, for example, that the Russian might say to his younger – “Do not forget that you are Russian,” but unlikely to say – “Do not forget that you are a Pole!”. The Chinese say this: “whether the Chinese!” But in any case will not call his younger-be Japanese. Circassians consider themselves Hittites called themselves the Hittites, and in this capacious phrase tremendous emotional content – the pride of ethnic belonging and pride historical. In this phrase, apart from the direct sense, founded and still call – and continue to increase the glory of the Hittites. And that’s what the Circassians consider themselves Hittites and call themselves by the Hittites, a problem with the official historical version. Where geographically Hittites, and where the Circassians? At what time of the Hittites lived, and when there were Circassians? What do they overlap? So can ask us questions scientists hettologi. And then do they say, “The Circassians Hittites can not be!”. Because none of the discoverers of the Hittites, whose works are the basis of knowledge of this ancient people were not aware of the phrase “Het zhegyIe,” and still occuring at the Circassians.Hettologiya otherwise probably would have gone a different way. It turns out this discrepancy, this little phrase, being taken into account, can change the existing concept and give rise to completely revise the Hittite perspective! Now, in the current concept of a single thread linking the Circassians and the Hittite power, is the thesis that the language of the inhabitants of pre-Indo-Malaya Asia – Hutt similar in structure and vocabulary of the languages ​​of the Abkhaz-Adyghe (Circassian, Ubykh, Abaza, Abkhaz). But this “thin thread” science is not interested and does not develop it. Let us now take some scientific texts and identify them on the Hittites, and subject the thing in question. Let’s start with the big terminological confusion that exists regarding the Hittites. This confusion is one of the main reasons as to who the Hittites. So: 1. Hittites science calls the people who spoke an Indo-European language, which appeared from nowhere in the Land of Hatti. He gradually over several centuries colonized the country and became co-exist with the local indigenous population – the Hutts. 2. Hittites science also refers to the people, formed as a result of a long cohabitation and mixing with the local Indo-European aliens aboriginal population – not Indo Hutts. In general, the Hittites called all the inhabitants of the Hittite state. 3. Hittites called the people who lived in small kingdoms – the ruins of the once-powerful Hittite power scattered throughout Anatolia after the fall of the empire. 4. “Protohettami” science calls the people who lived in Asia Minor before the Indo-Europeans began to appear there. Self-designation of the indigenous population were the Hittites and Hatti, – depending on the dialect pronunciation. And they came to the land called Indo-Europeans themselves – nesity. Also in science says that “protohetty” had a mature civilization at the time of occurrence of the first nesitov. Between the “Hittites”-Indo-Europeans and “protohettami” – there is no genetic or ethnic ties, although the term “proto-” implies it. 5. The Bible calls the Hittites, heteyanami, Hittites all the people mentioned in the above paragraphs. Actually thanks to this book all the first time and learned about the existence of Hittite power in ancient times. 6. In ordinary consciousness of those who have heard at least something about the Hittites, and to popularize the representation deliberately primitivized modern scientific exposition, the Hittites – is the first in the history of Indo-Europeans who conquered Asia Minor and prevailed in those lands. They are pioneers in the iron and competitors of ancient Egypt, who built a great civilization. contradictions hidden in terminology and the terminology is the basis of the proper filing of the information. Terminology – a conditional language, and if there are contradictions, in the knowledge there is confusion. With regard to our definition, if the information in paragraph 1 to take the number as correct or true definition of the term, the information in paragraph number 2 and number 3 – turns out not true, not accurate. If we assume that the correct information set out in paragraph number 2, we now have other items in error. In any case, the term – “protohetty” specified in paragraph number 4, is initially not true – it is not competent definition. You can not use a prefix – “proto-” where there is no consistent genetic and ethnic ties. Due to this whole mess, and formed a scientific statement contained in paragraph number 6 – primitivized and popularized the concept of the Hittites. That’s one of the samples of such notions: “But the Hittites continued to ask riddles. And the chief was yet to come – in fact Hittite was an Indo-European language! This entailed another problem: the means and the people were Indo-European … “(Volkov, N. Forgetful.” Hittites. Unknown empire in Asia Minor “). As can be countered this mess and rather primitive ideas? That in addition to the phrase “Het zhegyIe!”, There is still the Circassians? And there is still much that is stored in the traditions of the Circassian people in the songs, in language, rituals, knowledge about ourselves. Scientific expedition to collect vintage songs Circassians in the 30 years of the twentieth century, has found the song on bzhedugskom dialect Circassians. We present here the lyrics translated into the Russian language: “The Hittites our grandfathers, the ancient tribe are, legendary belief. Hittite kingdom great for large sea lies, becoming famous, is expanding. His border to Egypt brought the Hittites, Ramses – King of Egypt Unhappy with this war begins. The Hittites their knowledge in all aspects of bringing governor of Egypt – Pharaoh Ramses comes to the Hittites, the Agreement concluded together. Both sides were related … ” As they say – no comment … There are examples of linguistic and Abkhaz language, which are related to the Circassian. In the vernacular of the Abkhaz There is one very interesting expression. When the Abkhaz want to say the phrase, “Mother Tongue”, he says: “A-Ha Tay byzshaa”, which literally translated into Russian, as: – “Hutt language.” In addition, all of the Circassian dialects to ask the man – “who are you?”, You say, ‘ue uhet? “, Which literally translated -” you Hittite? “That is, in the semantic meaning:” you own? ” “You is ours.”At the Circassians and today are fairly common names with the root “huts”, which are conserved Hittite past – Khatko (Hetykue) Hatyzh (Hetyzh) Atazhukin (Hetezhykue), as well as the names – Hetu, Hete, Hetyze etc.; also one of the Circassian Peoples called – hatukaytsy. All this is knowledge of the Circassian people of its glorious past, of itself, so they are closer to the truth to common sense. Are robust and scientists such statements: “On the other side of science are also established undeniable traits of kinship of the Caucasian languages ​​with some now dead languages ​​of the Near East, in particular protohettskih language. This last, as it turns out, is particularly close to the Abkhaz-Adyghe languages, in particular Ubykh. ” Talking about the relationship “protohettskih” language with Adyghe-Abkhaz GAMelikishvili G. writes: “The use of prefixes as morphological elements, as well as many other effects of morphological structure of the language actually brings him to the highlanders Caucasian languages ​​(Ubykh, Circassian, Abazinian). ST Eremyan also classifies ancient Abkhazian-Circassian tribes to protohettskih ethnic world. “According to the famous Russian author Alexander aces, “protohetty” Hatta and historical Atlanteans – they are different names for one and the same people. The author writes: “So, defined the location of Atlantis – a real country Dardanovogo killed in the flood. Inhabited this country highly developed nation – Atlanta, more Hutts, protohetty.Atlantean culture has had a huge impact on the culture of the surrounding nations, including the Slav. ” . need to pay attention to the following. As described above, and Science and the Bible, and the usual popularized the view is called the Hittites different “subjects”, thereby contradicting one another. And they do not know for certain which of these “entities” referred to himself as the Hittites. On the other side of the Circassians Hittites no one calls, but they call themselves, and see themselves as descendants of the ancient people of this particular. Why there was such confusion in terms of why the Indo-European component of the knowledge of the Hittites came to the fore, and “protohettskih” component remains in the shade and accordingly the value of the Circassians and their knowledge of it are invisible, and even unknown to science? After all, no doubt, and it shows, as they say, to the naked eye, that the knowledge of the Hittites, as well as their own country and their history is made ​​up of two components – neindoevropeyskoy and Indo-European. first cause confusion and the fact that, in modern terms, an Indo-European component has a greater “public relations”, that the discoverers of the Hittites – the Europeans themselves. So that they attach great importance to “own” the Indo-European component – is completely natural. The second reason – it is, of course, is that the very discovery of the civilization of the Hittites, and deciphering texts took place in the late XIX – early XX centuries. – That is, in the heyday – “Indo-European ideas.” Then science behaved like this: find a cart, which once ran past the so-called “Indo-European” and immediately Science stated: “This is our cart!”, Thus, never noticing that in the cart, then sat two Africans. .. Science, which itself is Indo-European, by definition, opening the Hittites, Indo-Europeans called them. It was a powerful civilization, a rival of Egypt, the discoverer of iron, and the temptation to call it the first Indo-European civilization was very large. Especially cuneiform tablets were found on a hitherto unknown Indo-European language. So firmly established opinion: the Hittites – this is the first Indo-Europeans, who built a civilization equal to ancient Egypt, and so on … Huttese primordial element has been left in the shadows, although he now lies on the surface, but this topic is now almost do not work out. If you develop it, the Indo-European component will lose a lot.Here are some details that lie on the surface, but in the “shadow”: 1. Prior to Asia Minor began to appear Indo-Europeans – there was already a highly developed civilization, and strangers to it did not add anything significant. We can say that they have come to a ready-made. The fact that came to Asia Minor, Indo-Europeans were below the level of culture – also known. 2. The aliens have not won territory Hatti – for centuries they gradually settled and assimilated among the local population. 3. The pivotal element of culture, and the main control – it is a religion. It has remained the same as before the Indo-European language of the sacred ritual was pre-Indo – Hutt. Even the name of the gods remained Hutt. 4. And the Caucasian country Ashuyya and Maikop culture, and the Hittite empire – all links in a continuous chain. Hittites consider separately – it’s just not seeing the whole historical picture as a whole. After all, Country Hattie was not an island of civilization, and was part of a larger one world along the southern and eastern coast of the Black Sea, albeit with separate centers, but with the kindred tribes. 5. There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans at least somewhat dominated in the Land of Hatti. Either in politics or in culture or in religion, they do not sway. Even the situation is somewhat the opposite. It is known that most of the kings wore Hutt, not Indo-European names. Religion has not changed under the influence of newcomers. And the quote is another fact: “The merger of the Indo-Europeans with native tribes in the Hutt Central Asia Minor formed Hittite ethnic group, who created around the middle of the XVIII century. BC. e. powerful Hittite state, fully embrace the rich cultural traditions of the Hutt “(GG Giorgadze.” Ancient History “, 1989). 6. Hittites called themselves, not Indo-Europeans, and the Hutts – and now continue to call themselves Circassians. However, I might say, why then Hutt language in the Land of Hatti was dead, preserved only in religious texts and rituals, and became the Indo-European language of the proceedings, diplomacy Hetskom tsarstve.I is it really? This question is answered scientist Gordon Childe, in his book “Aryans – the founders of European civilization”: “First of all, the material that we have at our disposal, and this plate from the state archives of Hittite kings in Boghazkoy reflects only the language in which the said the Hittites in Cappadocia, and on this basis it is impossible to draw any conclusions regarding the other “Hittites”, for example, those who lived in Carchemish in northern Syria. Moreover, now it is clear that even in Cappadocia, there was a large number of languages: Pali, Mitanni and protohettskih. On the latter should pay particular attention, as he left behind their own written records. There is no doubt that the “Hittites” can not be attributed to a number of Indo-Europeans. Another thing dialect, which themselves scribes called “our language”, no doubt experienced the Indo-European influence. ” It is a pity of course that Gordon Childe did not know that the Circassians have an expression – “Be Hett!” – this would make it even more convinced in correctness of his conclusions. Sam Hutt language, of course, refers to a group of Adygea abhazzskoy-Caucasian language family, and as complex as the Circassian Ubykh, Abkhazian languages ​​.. Many native language Hutt could move to a simpler Indo-European language, especially in the field of public administration. Similar examples in the history of the Circassians were later – Circassian Mamluk sultans, ruled an empire in Arabic. A modern Circassians in Turkey have moved into Turkish, to both the public and easier language than their mother tongue. Apparently, this happened in the Land of Hatti, where more than a simple Indo-European language has spread rapidly multiethnic empire as more acceptable as an international and local Hutt complex language remained as a spoken language and the sacred. Otherwise, as modern scientists say if hatsky language completely disappeared back in those days, remaining only in religious texts, and became a dead language, then how to have survived the phrase – “Het zhegyIe!”?To answer this question, we need to show the contradictions that exist in science – hettologii. To do this, we present a table in which the left-hand side – well-established scientific or become popular theses (red font), and the right part of the – counter or knowledge of the Circassian people about themselves (blue): 1. The Hittites – Indo-Europeans. 1. Yes, indeed, among the ethnic group, called “Hittites”, was a significant Indo-European com-ponents. Indo-Europeans but they did not call themselves – “Hittite.” This exonym by the name of the country, the inhabitants of which they were, and that existed before them. Hittites called themselves natives – Hatta (“protohetty”). And now in the modern world by the Hittites called themselves Circassians. 2. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, the creators of advanced civilization and powers equal to ancient Egypt. 2. Civilization Hutt existed long before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor. 3.Anitas king – the first king of the Hittites 3. And to Anitas in the Land of Hatti kings were, however, Anitas first king caught in the record which read our contemporaries scientists. It is a mistake to begin with Anitas history of the Hittites. 4. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans – the discoverers of iron. 4. Iron was known Hutts before the Indo-Europeans came to Central Asia Minor. This is indicated by the message of Pharaoh king of Hatti with a request to send him an iron dagger. The message is dated 2000 BC. e. 5. -Indo-European Hittites ruled Asia Minor from 1750 to 1200 years BC 5.There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans were somewhat dominated the rest of the population of the country of Hatti. Rather the reverse: most famous kings wore Hutt names. 6. The Indo-Europeans conquered Asia Minor and established the Empire. 6. In the literature, many times repeated, that the conquest was not, and there was a gradual settlement of the Indo-Europeans in the Land of Hatti, and integration. From the above we can draw the following conclusions: 1. Necessary to create a science Circassian Abhazalogii to live with the position of the fragments of an ancient civilization – Cherkess (Circassians), Ubykhs the Abaza, Abkhaz to reconsider the knowledge of the Hittites, the country Ashuyya, ancient Mesopotamia, the Maikop culture, not separately, but in unity. It also requires knowledge of the languages ​​and dialects of all these Caucasian peoples. 2. The opening of which John Kolaruso reported in 2011 (details in a later chapter), once again confirms that the future Europeans and future Circassians in the past for a long time been in interaction with each other. 3. There is a popular belief about the Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, who created the Hittite power does not hold water. We can only speak Otomi that the country of Hatti, there is some component of the Indo-European. At the same backbone political model – Confederation controlled by a single ruler, and in fact has a socialist system of government – that is nonsense for the Ancient World, remained. 4. The only pieces of Hatti Countries that existed before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor – it’s Circassians and Abkhazians. And for them, “Hittite” – an ancient self. 5. History of the Hittites did not have a gap between the XII and XVIII centuries. BC. e. This is exactly the time when the Europeans future and the future of the Circassians, Abkhazians coexisted within the same public education. It was during this period of time the Europeans borrowed from the future of the future of the Circassians, Abkhaz culture, which became the basis of European civilization, not to mention the genes which, according to the latest findings, in large enough quantities is among the Europeans. 6. History in the case of the Hittites once again shows its bias and clumsiness, and the “authority” prodavlivaya “best” ideas, and being by definition the “Indo-European” – pulls the blanket over himself. Now I want to give an interesting example of the Bible in the Hittite subject. It is the story of perhaps the most famous of the Hittites – Uriah Hettiyanine. This character of the Old Testament was in the list of the best soldiers of the governor of the state of Israel – King David. It tells about 11 head of the 2nd Book of Kings. All who read the Old Testament, remember this story. The act of Uriah the Hittite is completely separate from the other acts and the acts described in the Bible. What is the difference? You might ask. The difference in motivation. Bible is full of stories about the various exploits, deeds, deeds. They are committed in the name of faith, the Lord of kings, women, brothers. There were acts committed because of lust for power, greed, and the other was the cause of meanness, selfishness, etc. There were, of course, act in the name of love and compassion. That is, in each case has its own motive. And Uriah act is fundamentally different from all the others, described in the Old Testament, it was his motivation. Let’s remember how it was. Uriah the Hittite, refuses to go home to sleep with his wife, thereby violating the order of their king – David. David himself so wanted to hide the cause of his wife’s pregnancy Uriah – Bathsheba.Pregnancy, as we learn from the same story, came from the fact that at the time, as long as Uriah was at war, King David’s wife forced him to close and she suffered from it. If Uriah at least one night spent at home, it would be possible to justify pregnancy Beersheba. So King David through cunning attempts to send Uriah home to spend the night. And Uriah refuses to go home at night, although it is an order of the king, and, as we know the word gentleman – the law for his servants. But no, Uriah did not go home and spend the night at the gate of the palace, along with security. He did not comply with an order of the king, and should any of its own internal installation. And this set is stronger than the word of a king, though the king’s word, and the law for his servants. At the very same King David about this setup is not even know, or he would have chosen a different tactical trick against Uriah. Some kind of ethical standard, unknown to King David and the other Israelis, Uriah does not allow to execute the order of the king. Any other warrior in place of Uriah, who came from the war, and who had not seen for a long time my wife would love to obey the order of the king, without even thinking. But not the Hittite. He is the king says, “… and my lord Joab and the servants of my lord are in the field, and I went to his house to eat and drink, and sleep with my wife? I swear by thy life and the life of your soul, I will not do! “This behavior says that Uriah the Hittite is subject to ethical standards that at a later time, known as the Circassians -” zekIue habze “- the unwritten law of marching. It is part of the Circassian ethics – Adyghe Khabza. During the raid, campaign, war, every soldier obeys the “zekIue habze.” The fundamental principle of the law marching sounds like this: “The interests of the group (party, army detachment) is always more important than the interests of any single voina.Ni separately taken warrior can not have any privileges and benefits as opposed to the other before the end of the campaign (war, the raid) . Other important principles of this Code are as follows: “To leave the battlefield for any reason, except for tactical reasons, leaving the other – means to cover their name and shame their children forever” “The commander elected only during the campaign, and only by their personal qualities.” “Commander leaves last battlefield. ” ‘surrender – the biggest disgrace. ” These principles and requirements remained the Circassians in their military culture until the end of the XIX century. And in the understanding of Uriah – to go to bed with his wife at the time, when his combat comrades in the field, it equates to flee from the battlefield. Such an understanding in principle characteristic of Hittite. The only possible way out for himself, he sees – to spend the night with the same soldiers like himself, to the protection of the palace, with soldiers who are directly in the line of military obyazonnostey. Thus, Uriah creates for himself the situation in which he can consider himself not run away from the battlefield. King David was re-invited me Uriah the next day and “eating with him and drank, and he made ​​him drunk.” King hoped that Uriah drunk certainly will spend the night home to his wife. However, it is not, is not, – sleeps with security at the gate of the palace.Even napivshiysya Uriah did not violate its internal charter. It must be emphasized that no one ever would have blamed him if he slept at home. Only his inner principle and military upbringing, his conscience and his judge. It is this military principle, unknown to the Israelis would not allow the will of the king of Uriah. If you say that this is not surprising, such a principle would not only be from the Hittites and the Circassians you would be wrong, because the Jews of this is not known, it is very clear from the biblical story. seems that Uriah repeatedly said senior “Het zhegyIe” – “Be Hett!” – that is, “to multiply the glory of the Hittites!”. And he actually went on and increase in the millennium. Uriah the Hittite – the symbol of this military honor. The honor cost him his life. Uriah name a few times in the history of the Circassians, and probably in the pre-Christian Circassia was quite common. 1. From the ancient inscriptions known – Ware Hetu – full namesake of Uriah the Hittite, of which four thousand years ago wrote an Assyrian king Narasmin. This inscription is carved in stone. Says that of the Western Caucasus thousand years ago came under the leadership of the Hutts Ware Hetu and captured the city of Akkad, and built a city Carchemish and Thapsek. 2. Ueri Dade – the so-called leader Kasogs (ancestors of the Circassians), who fought a duel with the Russian Tmutarakan Prince Mstislav in 1022 in the Russian chronicles the name sounds like – “Rededi.” 3. Ueri Dade – the so-called People’s Court judge, in a story about a wise man Zhabagiev cauldron. Ueri Zhabagiev was the forerunner of the People’s Court. In all cases, except for the story about the judge, the name of Uriah are soldiers – unit commanders. Perhaps this is a military post, or some kind of nickname given to colleagues for military merit, because in Circassian: “Uerra!” – Forward! “Ware” – a war, a war.”Uerubyd” – a prisoner of war. “Uerysh” – Warhorse . “Uerk” – a professional soldier, officer. (The letter “E” in the Circassian language-A short beep) Apparently, the English word – “war” and the Bulgarian – “Thief” – derived from this ancient root .. Wife Uriah the Hittite, which later became the wife of King David and King Solomon’s mother, was called – Bathsheba that twisted like – Bathsheba. “Baie-it-schabe” in the language of the Circassians read: Baie many IT “containing” Schabe, “gentle.” Just-“tender”. As the name for a girl in today’s Circassian world, the name of the organic and reminiscent of the Circassian names such as – NefIytsIe – “black-eyed” Pague – “snub” Naschhue – “gray-eyed”, Schabe – “soft, tender”. The name of her grandfather – Ahithophel. This name contains three Circassian roots: “het” – Hittite, “fe” – appearance, form and “lly” – man. “A” – is common in the Abkhaz-Adyghe language group prefix pointing to a specific object specifying affix. Linguists are trying to translate the name from the Hebrew, the result is – “brother of madness.” Agree, not the most appropriate name for the adviser of King David and indeed the name allogichno for any nation. which translated into Russian means – “Be Hett». A detailed interpretation of the meaning: “Behave yourself so that you talked about: he – Hittite.” This phrase is also hidden emotional appeal “to multiply and continue the glory of the Hittites!”. This phrase is now actively used in everyday speech, the Circassians, it is – the current live the phrase used by the people. Usually it says senior years younger naputstvuya or instructing. For example, watching the road, in the army, to school, to the competition. should also pay attention to the fact that in the phrase, “Be Hett!” no value or meaning, which would be expressed in the phrase, “Be like or similar Hetty” or same “imitate Hetty.” It calls not to try to be like the Hittite, and it is not to forget that you Hittite. That is the kind of person who utters this expression, considers himself and the person to whom it is said – the Hittites. On this basis, it is clear and understandable, that we are dealing with the archaic self-designation of the Circassians. This is evidenced by the common sense, because it is logical, for example, that the Russian might say to his younger – “Do not forget that you are Russian,” but unlikely to say – “Do not forget that you are a Pole!”. The Chinese say this: “whether the Chinese!” But in any case will not call his younger-be Japanese. Circassians consider themselves Hittites called themselves the Hittites, and in this capacious phrase tremendous emotional content – the pride of ethnic belonging and pride historical. In this phrase, apart from the direct sense, founded and still call – and continue to increase the glory of the Hittites. And that’s what the Circassians consider themselves Hittites and call themselves by the Hittites, a problem with the official historical version. Where geographically Hittites, and where the Circassians? At what time of the Hittites lived, and when there were Circassians? What do they overlap? So can ask us questions scientists hettologi. And then do they say, “The Circassians Hittites can not be!”. Because none of the discoverers of the Hittites, whose works are the basis of knowledge of this ancient people were not aware of the phrase “Het zhegyIe,” and still occuring at the Circassians.Hettologiya otherwise probably would have gone a different way. It turns out this discrepancy, this little phrase, being taken into account, can change the existing concept and give rise to completely revise the Hittite perspective! Now, in the current concept of a single thread linking the Circassians and the Hittite power, is the thesis that the language of the inhabitants of pre-Indo-Malaya Asia – Hutt similar in structure and vocabulary of the languages ​​of the Abkhaz-Adyghe (Circassian, Ubykh, Abaza, Abkhaz). But this “thin thread” science is not interested and does not develop it. Let us now take some scientific texts and identify them on the Hittites, and subject the thing in question. Let’s start with the big terminological confusion that exists regarding the Hittites. This confusion is one of the main reasons as to who the Hittites. So: 1. Hittites science calls the people who spoke an Indo-European language, which appeared from nowhere in the Land of Hatti. He gradually over several centuries colonized the country and became co-exist with the local indigenous population – the Hutts. 2. Hittites science also refers to the people, formed as a result of a long cohabitation and mixing with the local Indo-European aliens aboriginal population – not Indo Hutts. In general, the Hittites called all the inhabitants of the Hittite state. 3. Hittites called the people who lived in small kingdoms – the ruins of the once-powerful Hittite power scattered throughout Anatolia after the fall of the empire. 4. “Protohettami” science calls the people who lived in Asia Minor before the Indo-Europeans began to appear there. Self-designation of the indigenous population were the Hittites and Hatti, – depending on the dialect pronunciation. And they came to the land called Indo-Europeans themselves – nesity. Also in science says that “protohetty” had a mature civilization at the time of occurrence of the first nesitov. Between the “Hittites”-Indo-Europeans and “protohettami” – there is no genetic or ethnic ties, although the term “proto-” implies it. 5. The Bible calls the Hittites, heteyanami, Hittites all the people mentioned in the above paragraphs. Actually thanks to this book all the first time and learned about the existence of Hittite power in ancient times. 6. In ordinary consciousness of those who have heard at least something about the Hittites, and to popularize the representation deliberately primitivized modern scientific exposition, the Hittites – is the first in the history of Indo-Europeans who conquered Asia Minor and prevailed in those lands. They are pioneers in the iron and competitors of ancient Egypt, who built a great civilization. contradictions hidden in terminology and the terminology is the basis of the proper filing of the information. Terminology – a conditional language, and if there are contradictions, in the knowledge there is confusion. With regard to our definition, if the information in paragraph 1 to take the number as correct or true definition of the term, the information in paragraph number 2 and number 3 – turns out not true, not accurate. If we assume that the correct information set out in paragraph number 2, we now have other items in error. In any case, the term – “protohetty” specified in paragraph number 4, is initially not true – it is not competent definition. You can not use a prefix – “proto-” where there is no consistent genetic and ethnic ties. Due to this whole mess, and formed a scientific statement contained in paragraph number 6 – primitivized and popularized the concept of the Hittites. That’s one of the samples of such notions: “But the Hittites continued to ask riddles. And the chief was yet to come – in fact Hittite was an Indo-European language! This entailed another problem: the means and the people were Indo-European … “(Volkov, N. Forgetful.” Hittites. Unknown empire in Asia Minor “). As can be countered this mess and rather primitive ideas? That in addition to the phrase “Het zhegyIe!”, There is still the Circassians? And there is still much that is stored in the traditions of the Circassian people in the songs, in language, rituals, knowledge about ourselves. Scientific expedition to collect vintage songs Circassians in the 30 years of the twentieth century, has found the song on bzhedugskom dialect Circassians. We present here the lyrics translated into the Russian language: “The Hittites our grandfathers, the ancient tribe are, legendary belief. Hittite kingdom great for large sea lies, becoming famous, is expanding. His border to Egypt brought the Hittites, Ramses – King of Egypt Unhappy with this war begins. The Hittites their knowledge in all aspects of bringing governor of Egypt – Pharaoh Ramses comes to the Hittites, the Agreement concluded together. Both sides were related … ” As they say – no comment … There are examples of linguistic and Abkhaz language, which are related to the Circassian. In the vernacular of the Abkhaz There is one very interesting expression. When the Abkhaz want to say the phrase, “Mother Tongue”, he says: “A-Ha Tay byzshaa”, which literally translated into Russian, as: – “Hutt language.” In addition, all of the Circassian dialects to ask the man – “who are you?”, You say, ‘ue uhet? “, Which literally translated -” you Hittite? “That is, in the semantic meaning:” you own? ” “You is ours.”At the Circassians and today are fairly common names with the root “huts”, which are conserved Hittite past – Khatko (Hetykue) Hatyzh (Hetyzh) Atazhukin (Hetezhykue), as well as the names – Hetu, Hete, Hetyze etc.; also one of the Circassian Peoples called – hatukaytsy. All this is knowledge of the Circassian people of its glorious past, of itself, so they are closer to the truth to common sense. Are robust and scientists such statements: “On the other side of science are also established undeniable traits of kinship of the Caucasian languages ​​with some now dead languages ​​of the Near East, in particular protohettskih language. This last, as it turns out, is particularly close to the Abkhaz-Adyghe languages, in particular Ubykh. ” Talking about the relationship “protohettskih” language with Adyghe-Abkhaz GAMelikishvili G. writes: “The use of prefixes as morphological elements, as well as many other effects of morphological structure of the language actually brings him to the highlanders Caucasian languages ​​(Ubykh, Circassian, Abazinian). ST Eremyan also classifies ancient Abkhazian-Circassian tribes to protohettskih ethnic world. “According to the famous Russian author Alexander aces, “protohetty” Hatta and historical Atlanteans – they are different names for one and the same people. The author writes: “So, defined the location of Atlantis – a real country Dardanovogo killed in the flood. Inhabited this country highly developed nation – Atlanta, more Hutts, protohetty.Atlantean culture has had a huge impact on the culture of the surrounding nations, including the Slav. ” . need to pay attention to the following. As described above, and Science and the Bible, and the usual popularized the view is called the Hittites different “subjects”, thereby contradicting one another. And they do not know for certain which of these “entities” referred to himself as the Hittites. On the other side of the Circassians Hittites no one calls, but they call themselves, and see themselves as descendants of the ancient people of this particular. Why there was such confusion in terms of why the Indo-European component of the knowledge of the Hittites came to the fore, and “protohettskih” component remains in the shade and accordingly the value of the Circassians and their knowledge of it are invisible, and even unknown to science? After all, no doubt, and it shows, as they say, to the naked eye, that the knowledge of the Hittites, as well as their own country and their history is made ​​up of two components – neindoevropeyskoy and Indo-European. first cause confusion and the fact that, in modern terms, an Indo-European component has a greater “public relations”, that the discoverers of the Hittites – the Europeans themselves. So that they attach great importance to “own” the Indo-European component – is completely natural. The second reason – it is, of course, is that the very discovery of the civilization of the Hittites, and deciphering texts took place in the late XIX – early XX centuries. – That is, in the heyday – “Indo-European ideas.” Then science behaved like this: find a cart, which once ran past the so-called “Indo-European” and immediately Science stated: “This is our cart!”, Thus, never noticing that in the cart, then sat two Africans. .. Science, which itself is Indo-European, by definition, opening the Hittites, Indo-Europeans called them. It was a powerful civilization, a rival of Egypt, the discoverer of iron, and the temptation to call it the first Indo-European civilization was very large. Especially cuneiform tablets were found on a hitherto unknown Indo-European language. So firmly established opinion: the Hittites – this is the first Indo-Europeans, who built a civilization equal to ancient Egypt, and so on … Huttese primordial element has been left in the shadows, although he now lies on the surface, but this topic is now almost do not work out. If you develop it, the Indo-European component will lose a lot.Here are some details that lie on the surface, but in the “shadow”: 1. Prior to Asia Minor began to appear Indo-Europeans – there was already a highly developed civilization, and strangers to it did not add anything significant. We can say that they have come to a ready-made. The fact that came to Asia Minor, Indo-Europeans were below the level of culture – also known. 2. The aliens have not won territory Hatti – for centuries they gradually settled and assimilated among the local population. 3. The pivotal element of culture, and the main control – it is a religion. It has remained the same as before the Indo-European language of the sacred ritual was pre-Indo – Hutt. Even the name of the gods remained Hutt. 4. And the Caucasian country Ashuyya and Maikop culture, and the Hittite empire – all links in a continuous chain. Hittites consider separately – it’s just not seeing the whole historical picture as a whole. After all, Country Hattie was not an island of civilization, and was part of a larger one world along the southern and eastern coast of the Black Sea, albeit with separate centers, but with the kindred tribes. 5. There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans at least somewhat dominated in the Land of Hatti. Either in politics or in culture or in religion, they do not sway. Even the situation is somewhat the opposite. It is known that most of the kings wore Hutt, not Indo-European names. Religion has not changed under the influence of newcomers. And the quote is another fact: “The merger of the Indo-Europeans with native tribes in the Hutt Central Asia Minor formed Hittite ethnic group, who created around the middle of the XVIII century. BC. e. powerful Hittite state, fully embrace the rich cultural traditions of the Hutt “(GG Giorgadze.” Ancient History “, 1989). 6. Hittites called themselves, not Indo-Europeans, and the Hutts – and now continue to call themselves Circassians. However, I might say, why then Hutt language in the Land of Hatti was dead, preserved only in religious texts and rituals, and became the Indo-European language of the proceedings, diplomacy Hetskom tsarstve.I is it really? This question is answered scientist Gordon Childe, in his book “Aryans – the founders of European civilization”: “First of all, the material that we have at our disposal, and this plate from the state archives of Hittite kings in Boghazkoy reflects only the language in which the said the Hittites in Cappadocia, and on this basis it is impossible to draw any conclusions regarding the other “Hittites”, for example, those who lived in Carchemish in northern Syria. Moreover, now it is clear that even in Cappadocia, there was a large number of languages: Pali, Mitanni and protohettskih. On the latter should pay particular attention, as he left behind their own written records. There is no doubt that the “Hittites” can not be attributed to a number of Indo-Europeans. Another thing dialect, which themselves scribes called “our language”, no doubt experienced the Indo-European influence. ” It is a pity of course that Gordon Childe did not know that the Circassians have an expression – “Be Hett!” – this would make it even more convinced in correctness of his conclusions. Sam Hutt language, of course, refers to a group of Adygea abhazzskoy-Caucasian language family, and as complex as the Circassian Ubykh, Abkhazian languages ​​.. Many native language Hutt could move to a simpler Indo-European language, especially in the field of public administration. Similar examples in the history of the Circassians were later – Circassian Mamluk sultans, ruled an empire in Arabic. A modern Circassians in Turkey have moved into Turkish, to both the public and easier language than their mother tongue. Apparently, this happened in the Land of Hatti, where more than a simple Indo-European language has spread rapidly multiethnic empire as more acceptable as an international and local Hutt complex language remained as a spoken language and the sacred. Otherwise, as modern scientists say if hatsky language completely disappeared back in those days, remaining only in religious texts, and became a dead language, then how to have survived the phrase – “Het zhegyIe!”?To answer this question, we need to show the contradictions that exist in science – hettologii. To do this, we present a table in which the left-hand side – well-established scientific or become popular theses (red font), and the right part of the – counter or knowledge of the Circassian people about themselves (blue): 1. The Hittites – Indo-Europeans. 1. Yes, indeed, among the ethnic group, called “Hittites”, was a significant Indo-European com-ponents. Indo-Europeans but they did not call themselves – “Hittite.” This exonym by the name of the country, the inhabitants of which they were, and that existed before them. Hittites called themselves natives – Hatta (“protohetty”). And now in the modern world by the Hittites called themselves Circassians. 2. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, the creators of advanced civilization and powers equal to ancient Egypt. 2. Civilization Hutt existed long before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor. 3.Anitas king – the first king of the Hittites 3. And to Anitas in the Land of Hatti kings were, however, Anitas first king caught in the record which read our contemporaries scientists. It is a mistake to begin with Anitas history of the Hittites. 4. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans – the discoverers of iron. 4. Iron was known Hutts before the Indo-Europeans came to Central Asia Minor. This is indicated by the message of Pharaoh king of Hatti with a request to send him an iron dagger. The message is dated 2000 BC. e. 5. -Indo-European Hittites ruled Asia Minor from 1750 to 1200 years BC 5.There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans were somewhat dominated the rest of the population of the country of Hatti. Rather the reverse: most famous kings wore Hutt names. 6. The Indo-Europeans conquered Asia Minor and established the Empire. 6. In the literature, many times repeated, that the conquest was not, and there was a gradual settlement of the Indo-Europeans in the Land of Hatti, and integration. From the above we can draw the following conclusions: 1. Necessary to create a science Circassian Abhazalogii to live with the position of the fragments of an ancient civilization – Cherkess (Circassians), Ubykhs the Abaza, Abkhaz to reconsider the knowledge of the Hittites, the country Ashuyya, ancient Mesopotamia, the Maikop culture, not separately, but in unity. It also requires knowledge of the languages ​​and dialects of all these Caucasian peoples. 2. The opening of which John Kolaruso reported in 2011 (details in a later chapter), once again confirms that the future Europeans and future Circassians in the past for a long time been in interaction with each other. 3. There is a popular belief about the Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, who created the Hittite power does not hold water. We can only speak Otomi that the country of Hatti, there is some component of the Indo-European. At the same backbone political model – Confederation controlled by a single ruler, and in fact has a socialist system of government – that is nonsense for the Ancient World, remained. 4. The only pieces of Hatti Countries that existed before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor – it’s Circassians and Abkhazians. And for them, “Hittite” – an ancient self. 5. History of the Hittites did not have a gap between the XII and XVIII centuries. BC. e. This is exactly the time when the Europeans future and the future of the Circassians, Abkhazians coexisted within the same public education. It was during this period of time the Europeans borrowed from the future of the future of the Circassians, Abkhaz culture, which became the basis of European civilization, not to mention the genes which, according to the latest findings, in large enough quantities is among the Europeans. 6. History in the case of the Hittites once again shows its bias and clumsiness, and the “authority” prodavlivaya “best” ideas, and being by definition the “Indo-European” – pulls the blanket over himself. Now I want to give an interesting example of the Bible in the Hittite subject. It is the story of perhaps the most famous of the Hittites – Uriah Hettiyanine. This character of the Old Testament was in the list of the best soldiers of the governor of the state of Israel – King David. It tells about 11 head of the 2nd Book of Kings. All who read the Old Testament, remember this story. The act of Uriah the Hittite is completely separate from the other acts and the acts described in the Bible. What is the difference? You might ask. The difference in motivation. Bible is full of stories about the various exploits, deeds, deeds. They are committed in the name of faith, the Lord of kings, women, brothers. There were acts committed because of lust for power, greed, and the other was the cause of meanness, selfishness, etc. There were, of course, act in the name of love and compassion. That is, in each case has its own motive. And Uriah act is fundamentally different from all the others, described in the Old Testament, it was his motivation. Let’s remember how it was. Uriah the Hittite, refuses to go home to sleep with his wife, thereby violating the order of their king – David. David himself so wanted to hide the cause of his wife’s pregnancy Uriah – Bathsheba.Pregnancy, as we learn from the same story, came from the fact that at the time, as long as Uriah was at war, King David’s wife forced him to close and she suffered from it. If Uriah at least one night spent at home, it would be possible to justify pregnancy Beersheba. So King David through cunning attempts to send Uriah home to spend the night. And Uriah refuses to go home at night, although it is an order of the king, and, as we know the word gentleman – the law for his servants. But no, Uriah did not go home and spend the night at the gate of the palace, along with security. He did not comply with an order of the king, and should any of its own internal installation. And this set is stronger than the word of a king, though the king’s word, and the law for his servants. At the very same King David about this setup is not even know, or he would have chosen a different tactical trick against Uriah. Some kind of ethical standard, unknown to King David and the other Israelis, Uriah does not allow to execute the order of the king. Any other warrior in place of Uriah, who came from the war, and who had not seen for a long time my wife would love to obey the order of the king, without even thinking. But not the Hittite. He is the king says, “… and my lord Joab and the servants of my lord are in the field, and I went to his house to eat and drink, and sleep with my wife? I swear by thy life and the life of your soul, I will not do! “This behavior says that Uriah the Hittite is subject to ethical standards that at a later time, known as the Circassians -” zekIue habze “- the unwritten law of marching. It is part of the Circassian ethics – Adyghe Khabza. During the raid, campaign, war, every soldier obeys the “zekIue habze.” The fundamental principle of the law marching sounds like this: “The interests of the group (party, army detachment) is always more important than the interests of any single voina.Ni separately taken warrior can not have any privileges and benefits as opposed to the other before the end of the campaign (war, the raid) . Other important principles of this Code are as follows: “To leave the battlefield for any reason, except for tactical reasons, leaving the other – means to cover their name and shame their children forever” “The commander elected only during the campaign, and only by their personal qualities.” “Commander leaves last battlefield. ” ‘surrender – the biggest disgrace. ” These principles and requirements remained the Circassians in their military culture until the end of the XIX century. And in the understanding of Uriah – to go to bed with his wife at the time, when his combat comrades in the field, it equates to flee from the battlefield. Such an understanding in principle characteristic of Hittite. The only possible way out for himself, he sees – to spend the night with the same soldiers like himself, to the protection of the palace, with soldiers who are directly in the line of military obyazonnostey. Thus, Uriah creates for himself the situation in which he can consider himself not run away from the battlefield. King David was re-invited me Uriah the next day and “eating with him and drank, and he made ​​him drunk.” King hoped that Uriah drunk certainly will spend the night home to his wife. However, it is not, is not, – sleeps with security at the gate of the palace.Even napivshiysya Uriah did not violate its internal charter. It must be emphasized that no one ever would have blamed him if he slept at home. Only his inner principle and military upbringing, his conscience and his judge. It is this military principle, unknown to the Israelis would not allow the will of the king of Uriah. If you say that this is not surprising, such a principle would not only be from the Hittites and the Circassians you would be wrong, because the Jews of this is not known, it is very clear from the biblical story. seems that Uriah repeatedly said senior “Het zhegyIe” – “Be Hett!” – that is, “to multiply the glory of the Hittites!”. And he actually went on and increase in the millennium. Uriah the Hittite – the symbol of this military honor. The honor cost him his life. Uriah name a few times in the history of the Circassians, and probably in the pre-Christian Circassia was quite common. 1. From the ancient inscriptions known – Ware Hetu – full namesake of Uriah the Hittite, of which four thousand years ago wrote an Assyrian king Narasmin. This inscription is carved in stone. Says that of the Western Caucasus thousand years ago came under the leadership of the Hutts Ware Hetu and captured the city of Akkad, and built a city Carchemish and Thapsek. 2. Ueri Dade – the so-called leader Kasogs (ancestors of the Circassians), who fought a duel with the Russian Tmutarakan Prince Mstislav in 1022 in the Russian chronicles the name sounds like – “Rededi.” 3. Ueri Dade – the so-called People’s Court judge, in a story about a wise man Zhabagiev cauldron. Ueri Zhabagiev was the forerunner of the People’s Court. In all cases, except for the story about the judge, the name of Uriah are soldiers – unit commanders. Perhaps this is a military post, or some kind of nickname given to colleagues for military merit, because in Circassian: “Uerra!” – Forward! “Ware” – a war, a war.”Uerubyd” – a prisoner of war. “Uerysh” – Warhorse . “Uerk” – a professional soldier, officer. (The letter “E” in the Circassian language-A short beep) Apparently, the English word – “war” and the Bulgarian – “Thief” – derived from this ancient root .. Wife Uriah the Hittite, which later became the wife of King David and King Solomon’s mother, was called – Bathsheba that twisted like – Bathsheba. “Baie-it-schabe” in the language of the Circassians read: Baie many IT “containing” Schabe, “gentle.” Just-“tender”. As the name for a girl in today’s Circassian world, the name of the organic and reminiscent of the Circassian names such as – NefIytsIe – “black-eyed” Pague – “snub” Naschhue – “gray-eyed”, Schabe – “soft, tender”. The name of her grandfather – Ahithophel. This name contains three Circassian roots: “het” – Hittite, “fe” – appearance, form and “lly” – man. “A” – is common in the Abkhaz-Adyghe language group prefix pointing to a specific object specifying affix. Linguists are trying to translate the name from the Hebrew, the result is – “brother of madness.” Agree, not the most appropriate name for the adviser of King David and indeed the name allogichno for any nation. Hittites science also refers to the people, formed as a result of a long cohabitation and mixing with the local Indo-European aliens aboriginal population – not Indo Hutts. In general, the Hittites called all the inhabitants of the Hittite state. 3. Hittites called the people who lived in small kingdoms – the ruins of the once-powerful Hittite power scattered throughout Anatolia after the fall of the empire. 4. “Protohettami” science calls the people who lived in Asia Minor before the Indo-Europeans began to appear there. Self-designation of the indigenous population were the Hittites and Hatti, – depending on the dialect pronunciation. And they came to the land called Indo-Europeans themselves – nesity. Also in science says that “protohetty” had a mature civilization at the time of occurrence of the first nesitov.Between the “Hittites”-Indo-Europeans and “protohettami” – there is no genetic or ethnic ties, although the term “proto-” implies it. 5. The Bible calls the Hittites, heteyanami, Hittites all the people mentioned in the above paragraphs. Actually thanks to this book all the first time and learned about the existence of Hittite power in ancient times. 6. In ordinary consciousness of those who have heard at least something about the Hittites, and to popularize the representation deliberately primitivized modern scientific exposition, the Hittites – is the first in the history of Indo-Europeans who conquered Asia Minor and prevailed in those lands. They are pioneers in the iron and competitors of ancient Egypt, who built a great civilization. contradictions hidden in terminology and the terminology is the basis of the proper filing of the information. Terminology – a conditional language, and if there are contradictions, in the knowledge there is confusion.With regard to our definition, if the information in paragraph 1 to take the number as correct or true definition of the term, the information in paragraph number 2 and number 3 – turns out not true, not accurate. If we assume that the correct information set out in paragraph number 2, we now have other items in error. In any case, the term – “protohetty” specified in paragraph number 4, is initially not true – it is not competent definition. You can not use a prefix – “proto-” where there is no consistent genetic and ethnic ties. Due to this whole mess, and formed a scientific statement contained in paragraph number 6 – primitivized and popularized the concept of the Hittites. That’s one of the samples of such notions: “But the Hittites continued to ask riddles. And the chief was yet to come – in fact Hittite was an Indo-European language! This entailed another problem: the means and the people were Indo-European … “(Volkov, N. Forgetful.” Hittites. Unknown empire in Asia Minor “). As can be countered this mess and rather primitive ideas? That in addition to the phrase “Het zhegyIe!”, There is still the Circassians? And there is still much that is stored in the traditions of the Circassian people in the songs, in language, rituals, knowledge about ourselves. Scientific expedition to collect vintage songs Circassians in the 30 years of the twentieth century, has found the song on bzhedugskom dialect Circassians. We present here the lyrics translated into the Russian language: “The Hittites our grandfathers, the ancient tribe are, legendary belief. Hittite kingdom great for large sea lies, becoming famous, is expanding. His border to Egypt brought the Hittites, Ramses – King of Egypt Unhappy with this war begins. The Hittites their knowledge in all aspects of bringing governor of Egypt – Pharaoh Ramses comes to the Hittites, the Agreement concluded together. Both sides were related … ” As they say – no comment … There are examples of linguistic and Abkhaz language, which are related to the Circassian. In the vernacular of the Abkhaz There is one very interesting expression. When the Abkhaz want to say the phrase, “Mother Tongue”, he says: “A-Ha Tay byzshaa”, which literally translated into Russian, as: – “Hutt language.” In addition, all of the Circassian dialects to ask the man – “who are you?”, You say, ‘ue uhet? “, Which literally translated -” you Hittite? “That is, in the semantic meaning:” you own? ” “You is ours.” At the Circassians and today are fairly common names with the root “huts”, which are conserved Hittite past – Khatko (Hetykue) Hatyzh (Hetyzh) Atazhukin (Hetezhykue), as well as the names – Hetu, Hete, Hetyze etc.; also one of the Circassian Peoples called – hatukaytsy. All this is knowledge of the Circassian people of its glorious past, of itself, so they are closer to the truth to common sense. Are robust and scientists such statements: “On the other side of science are also established undeniable traits of kinship of the Caucasian languages ​​with some now dead languages ​​of the Near East, in particular protohettskih language. This last, as it turns out, is particularly close to the Abkhaz-Adyghe languages, in particular Ubykh. ” Talking about the relationship “protohettskih” language with Adyghe-Abkhaz GAMelikishvili G. writes: “The use of prefixes as morphological elements, as well as many other effects of morphological structure of the language actually brings him to the highlanders Caucasian languages ​​(Ubykh, Circassian, Abazinian). ST Eremyan also classifies ancient Abkhazian-Circassian tribes to protohettskih ethnic world. ” According to the famous Russian author Alexander aces, “protohetty” Hatta and historical Atlanteans – they are different names for one and the same people. The author writes: “So, defined the location of Atlantis – a real country Dardanovogo killed in the flood. Inhabited this country highly developed nation – Atlanta, more Hutts, protohetty. Atlantean culture has had a huge impact on the culture of the surrounding nations, including the Slav. ” . need to pay attention to the following. As described above, and Science and the Bible, and the usual popularized the view is called the Hittites different “subjects”, thereby contradicting one another.And they do not know for certain which of these “entities” referred to himself as the Hittites. On the other side of the Circassians Hittites no one calls, but they call themselves, and see themselves as descendants of the ancient people of this particular. Why there was such confusion in terms of why the Indo-European component of the knowledge of the Hittites came to the fore, and “protohettskih” component remains in the shade and accordingly the value of the Circassians and their knowledge of it are invisible, and even unknown to science? After all, no doubt, and it shows, as they say, to the naked eye, that the knowledge of the Hittites, as well as their own country and their history is made ​​up of two components – neindoevropeyskoy and Indo-European. first cause confusion and the fact that, in modern terms, an Indo-European component has a greater “public relations”, that the discoverers of the Hittites – the Europeans themselves. So that they attach great importance to “own” the Indo-European component – is completely natural. The second reason – it is, of course, is that the very discovery of the civilization of the Hittites, and deciphering texts took place in the late XIX – early XX centuries. – That is, in the heyday – “Indo-European ideas.” Then science behaved like this: find a cart, which once ran past the so-called “Indo-European” and immediately Science stated: “This is our cart!”, Thus, never noticing that in the cart, then sat two Africans. .. Science, which itself is Indo-European, by definition, opening the Hittites, Indo-Europeans called them. It was a powerful civilization, a rival of Egypt, the discoverer of iron, and the temptation to call it the first Indo-European civilization was very large. Especially cuneiform tablets were found on a hitherto unknown Indo-European language. So firmly established opinion: the Hittites – this is the first Indo-Europeans, who built a civilization equal to ancient Egypt, and so on … Huttese primordial element has been left in the shadows, although he now lies on the surface, but this topic is now almost do not work out. If you develop it, the Indo-European component will lose a lot. Here are some details that lie on the surface, but in the “shadow”: 1. Prior to Asia Minor began to appear Indo-Europeans – there was already a highly developed civilization, and strangers to it did not add anything significant. We can say that they have come to a ready-made. The fact that came to Asia Minor, Indo-Europeans were below the level of culture – also known. 2. The aliens have not won territory Hatti – for centuries they gradually settled and assimilated among the local population. 3. The pivotal element of culture, and the main control – it is a religion. It has remained the same as before the Indo-European language of the sacred ritual was pre-Indo – Hutt.Even the name of the gods remained Hutt. 4. And the Caucasian country Ashuyya and Maikop culture, and the Hittite empire – all links in a continuous chain. Hittites consider separately – it’s just not seeing the whole historical picture as a whole. After all, Country Hattie was not an island of civilization, and was part of a larger one world along the southern and eastern coast of the Black Sea, albeit with separate centers, but with the kindred tribes. 5. There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans at least somewhat dominated in the Land of Hatti. Either in politics or in culture or in religion, they do not sway. Even the situation is somewhat the opposite. It is known that most of the kings wore Hutt, not Indo-European names. Religion has not changed under the influence of newcomers. And the quote is another fact: “The merger of the Indo-Europeans with native tribes in the Hutt Central Asia Minor formed Hittite ethnic group, who created around the middle of the XVIII century. BC. e. powerful Hittite state, fully embrace the rich cultural traditions of the Hutt “(GG Giorgadze.” Ancient History “, 1989). 6. Hittites called themselves, not Indo-Europeans, and the Hutts – and now continue to call themselves Circassians. However, I might say, why then Hutt language in the Land of Hatti was dead, preserved only in religious texts and rituals, and became the Indo-European language of the proceedings, diplomacy Hetskom tsarstve.I is it really? This question is answered scientist Gordon Childe, in his book “Aryans – the founders of European civilization”: “First of all, the material that we have at our disposal, and this plate from the state archives of Hittite kings in Boghazkoy reflects only the language in which the said the Hittites in Cappadocia, and on this basis it is impossible to draw any conclusions regarding the other “Hittites”, for example, those who lived in Carchemish in northern Syria. Moreover, now it is clear that even in Cappadocia, there was a large number of languages: Pali, Mitanni and protohettskih. On the latter should pay particular attention, as he left behind their own written records. There is no doubt that the “Hittites” can not be attributed to a number of Indo-Europeans. Another thing dialect, which themselves scribes called “our language”, no doubt experienced the Indo-European influence. ” It is a pity of course that Gordon Childe did not know that the Circassians have an expression – “Be Hett!” – this would make it even more convinced in correctness of his conclusions. Sam Hutt language, of course, refers to a group of Adygea abhazzskoy-Caucasian language family, and as complex as the Circassian Ubykh, Abkhazian languages ​​.. Many native language Hutt could move to a simpler Indo-European language, especially in the field of public administration. Similar examples in the history of the Circassians were later – Circassian Mamluk sultans, ruled an empire in Arabic. A modern Circassians in Turkey have moved into Turkish, to both the public and easier language than their mother tongue. Apparently, this happened in the Land of Hatti, where more than a simple Indo-European language has spread rapidly multiethnic empire as more acceptable as an international and local Hutt complex language remained as a spoken language and the sacred. Otherwise, as modern scientists say if hatsky language completely disappeared back in those days, remaining only in religious texts, and became a dead language, then how to have survived the phrase – “Het zhegyIe!”?To answer this question, we need to show the contradictions that exist in science – hettologii. To do this, we present a table in which the left-hand side – well-established scientific or become popular theses (red font), and the right part of the – counter or knowledge of the Circassian people about themselves (blue): 1. The Hittites – Indo-Europeans. 1. Yes, indeed, among the ethnic group, called “Hittites”, was a significant Indo-European com-ponents. Indo-Europeans but they did not call themselves – “Hittite.” This exonym by the name of the country, the inhabitants of which they were, and that existed before them. Hittites called themselves natives – Hatta (“protohetty”). And now in the modern world by the Hittites called themselves Circassians. 2. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, the creators of advanced civilization and powers equal to ancient Egypt. 2. Civilization Hutt existed long before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor. 3.Anitas king – the first king of the Hittites 3. And to Anitas in the Land of Hatti kings were, however, Anitas first king caught in the record which read our contemporaries scientists. It is a mistake to begin with Anitas history of the Hittites. 4. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans – the discoverers of iron. 4. Iron was known Hutts before the Indo-Europeans came to Central Asia Minor. This is indicated by the message of Pharaoh king of Hatti with a request to send him an iron dagger. The message is dated 2000 BC. e. 5. -Indo-European Hittites ruled Asia Minor from 1750 to 1200 years BC 5.There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans were somewhat dominated the rest of the population of the country of Hatti. Rather the reverse: most famous kings wore Hutt names. 6. The Indo-Europeans conquered Asia Minor and established the Empire. 6. In the literature, many times repeated, that the conquest was not, and there was a gradual settlement of the Indo-Europeans in the Land of Hatti, and integration. From the above we can draw the following conclusions: 1. Necessary to create a science Circassian Abhazalogii to live with the position of the fragments of an ancient civilization – Cherkess (Circassians), Ubykhs the Abaza, Abkhaz to reconsider the knowledge of the Hittites, the country Ashuyya, ancient Mesopotamia, the Maikop culture, not separately, but in unity. It also requires knowledge of the languages ​​and dialects of all these Caucasian peoples. 2. The opening of which John Kolaruso reported in 2011 (details in a later chapter), once again confirms that the future Europeans and future Circassians in the past for a long time been in interaction with each other. 3. There is a popular belief about the Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, who created the Hittite power does not hold water. We can only speak Otomi that the country of Hatti, there is some component of the Indo-European. At the same backbone political model – Confederation controlled by a single ruler, and in fact has a socialist system of government – that is nonsense for the Ancient World, remained. 4. The only pieces of Hatti Countries that existed before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor – it’s Circassians and Abkhazians. And for them, “Hittite” – an ancient self. 5. History of the Hittites did not have a gap between the XII and XVIII centuries. BC. e. This is exactly the time when the Europeans future and the future of the Circassians, Abkhazians coexisted within the same public education. It was during this period of time the Europeans borrowed from the future of the future of the Circassians, Abkhaz culture, which became the basis of European civilization, not to mention the genes which, according to the latest findings, in large enough quantities is among the Europeans. 6. History in the case of the Hittites once again shows its bias and clumsiness, and the “authority” prodavlivaya “best” ideas, and being by definition the “Indo-European” – pulls the blanket over himself. Now I want to give an interesting example of the Bible in the Hittite subject. It is the story of perhaps the most famous of the Hittites – Uriah Hettiyanine. This character of the Old Testament was in the list of the best soldiers of the governor of the state of Israel – King David. It tells about 11 head of the 2nd Book of Kings. All who read the Old Testament, remember this story. The act of Uriah the Hittite is completely separate from the other acts and the acts described in the Bible. What is the difference? You might ask. The difference in motivation. Bible is full of stories about the various exploits, deeds, deeds. They are committed in the name of faith, the Lord of kings, women, brothers. There were acts committed because of lust for power, greed, and the other was the cause of meanness, selfishness, etc. There were, of course, act in the name of love and compassion. That is, in each case has its own motive. And Uriah act is fundamentally different from all the others, described in the Old Testament, it was his motivation. Let’s remember how it was. Uriah the Hittite, refuses to go home to sleep with his wife, thereby violating the order of their king – David. David himself so wanted to hide the cause of his wife’s pregnancy Uriah – Bathsheba.Pregnancy, as we learn from the same story, came from the fact that at the time, as long as Uriah was at war, King David’s wife forced him to close and she suffered from it. If Uriah at least one night spent at home, it would be possible to justify pregnancy Beersheba. So King David through cunning attempts to send Uriah home to spend the night. And Uriah refuses to go home at night, although it is an order of the king, and, as we know the word gentleman – the law for his servants. But no, Uriah did not go home and spend the night at the gate of the palace, along with security. He did not comply with an order of the king, and should any of its own internal installation. And this set is stronger than the word of a king, though the king’s word, and the law for his servants. At the very same King David about this setup is not even know, or he would have chosen a different tactical trick against Uriah. Some kind of ethical standard, unknown to King David and the other Israelis, Uriah does not allow to execute the order of the king. Any other warrior in place of Uriah, who came from the war, and who had not seen for a long time my wife would love to obey the order of the king, without even thinking. But not the Hittite. He is the king says, “… and my lord Joab and the servants of my lord are in the field, and I went to his house to eat and drink, and sleep with my wife? I swear by thy life and the life of your soul, I will not do! “This behavior says that Uriah the Hittite is subject to ethical standards that at a later time, known as the Circassians -” zekIue habze “- the unwritten law of marching. It is part of the Circassian ethics – Adyghe Khabza. During the raid, campaign, war, every soldier obeys the “zekIue habze.” The fundamental principle of the law marching sounds like this: “The interests of the group (party, army detachment) is always more important than the interests of any single voina.Ni separately taken warrior can not have any privileges and benefits as opposed to the other before the end of the campaign (war, the raid) . Other important principles of this Code are as follows: “To leave the battlefield for any reason, except for tactical reasons, leaving the other – means to cover their name and shame their children forever” “The commander elected only during the campaign, and only by their personal qualities.” “Commander leaves last battlefield. ” ‘surrender – the biggest disgrace. ” These principles and requirements remained the Circassians in their military culture until the end of the XIX century. And in the understanding of Uriah – to go to bed with his wife at the time, when his combat comrades in the field, it equates to flee from the battlefield. Such an understanding in principle characteristic of Hittite. The only possible way out for himself, he sees – to spend the night with the same soldiers like himself, to the protection of the palace, with soldiers who are directly in the line of military obyazonnostey. Thus, Uriah creates for himself the situation in which he can consider himself not run away from the battlefield. King David was re-invited me Uriah the next day and “eating with him and drank, and he made ​​him drunk.” King hoped that Uriah drunk certainly will spend the night home to his wife. However, it is not, is not, – sleeps with security at the gate of the palace.Even napivshiysya Uriah did not violate its internal charter. It must be emphasized that no one ever would have blamed him if he slept at home. Only his inner principle and military upbringing, his conscience and his judge. It is this military principle, unknown to the Israelis would not allow the will of the king of Uriah. If you say that this is not surprising, such a principle would not only be from the Hittites and the Circassians you would be wrong, because the Jews of this is not known, it is very clear from the biblical story. seems that Uriah repeatedly said senior “Het zhegyIe” – “Be Hett!” – that is, “to multiply the glory of the Hittites!”. And he actually went on and increase in the millennium. Uriah the Hittite – the symbol of this military honor. The honor cost him his life. Uriah name a few times in the history of the Circassians, and probably in the pre-Christian Circassia was quite common. 1. From the ancient inscriptions known – Ware Hetu – full namesake of Uriah the Hittite, of which four thousand years ago wrote an Assyrian king Narasmin. This inscription is carved in stone. Says that of the Western Caucasus thousand years ago came under the leadership of the Hutts Ware Hetu and captured the city of Akkad, and built a city Carchemish and Thapsek. 2. Ueri Dade – the so-called leader Kasogs (ancestors of the Circassians), who fought a duel with the Russian Tmutarakan Prince Mstislav in 1022 in the Russian chronicles the name sounds like – “Rededi.” 3. Ueri Dade – the so-called People’s Court judge, in a story about a wise man Zhabagiev cauldron. Ueri Zhabagiev was the forerunner of the People’s Court. In all cases, except for the story about the judge, the name of Uriah are soldiers – unit commanders. Perhaps this is a military post, or some kind of nickname given to colleagues for military merit, because in Circassian: “Uerra!” – Forward! “Ware” – a war, a war.”Uerubyd” – a prisoner of war. “Uerysh” – Warhorse . “Uerk” – a professional soldier, officer. (The letter “E” in the Circassian language-A short beep) Apparently, the English word – “war” and the Bulgarian – “Thief” – derived from this ancient root .. Wife Uriah the Hittite, which later became the wife of King David and King Solomon’s mother, was called – Bathsheba that twisted like – Bathsheba. “Baie-it-schabe” in the language of the Circassians read: Baie many IT “containing” Schabe, “gentle.” Just-“tender”. As the name for a girl in today’s Circassian world, the name of the organic and reminiscent of the Circassian names such as – NefIytsIe – “black-eyed” Pague – “snub” Naschhue – “gray-eyed”, Schabe – “soft, tender”. The name of her grandfather – Ahithophel. This name contains three Circassian roots: “het” – Hittite, “fe” – appearance, form and “lly” – man. “A” – is common in the Abkhaz-Adyghe language group prefix pointing to a specific object specifying affix. Linguists are trying to translate the name from the Hebrew, the result is – “brother of madness.” Agree, not the most appropriate name for the adviser of King David and indeed the name allogichno for any nation. Hittites science also refers to the people, formed as a result of a long cohabitation and mixing with the local Indo-European aliens aboriginal population – not Indo Hutts. In general, the Hittites called all the inhabitants of the Hittite state. 3. Hittites called the people who lived in small kingdoms – the ruins of the once-powerful Hittite power scattered throughout Anatolia after the fall of the empire. 4. “Protohettami” science calls the people who lived in Asia Minor before the Indo-Europeans began to appear there. Self-designation of the indigenous population were the Hittites and Hatti, – depending on the dialect pronunciation. And they came to the land called Indo-Europeans themselves – nesity. Also in science says that “protohetty” had a mature civilization at the time of occurrence of the first nesitov.Between the “Hittites”-Indo-Europeans and “protohettami” – there is no genetic or ethnic ties, although the term “proto-” implies it. 5. The Bible calls the Hittites, heteyanami, Hittites all the people mentioned in the above paragraphs. Actually thanks to this book all the first time and learned about the existence of Hittite power in ancient times. 6. In ordinary consciousness of those who have heard at least something about the Hittites, and to popularize the representation deliberately primitivized modern scientific exposition, the Hittites – is the first in the history of Indo-Europeans who conquered Asia Minor and prevailed in those lands. They are pioneers in the iron and competitors of ancient Egypt, who built a great civilization. contradictions hidden in terminology and the terminology is the basis of the proper filing of the information. Terminology – a conditional language, and if there are contradictions, in the knowledge there is confusion.With regard to our definition, if the information in paragraph 1 to take the number as correct or true definition of the term, the information in paragraph number 2 and number 3 – turns out not true, not accurate. If we assume that the correct information set out in paragraph number 2, we now have other items in error. In any case, the term – “protohetty” specified in paragraph number 4, is initially not true – it is not competent definition. You can not use a prefix – “proto-” where there is no consistent genetic and ethnic ties. Due to this whole mess, and formed a scientific statement contained in paragraph number 6 – primitivized and popularized the concept of the Hittites. That’s one of the samples of such notions: “But the Hittites continued to ask riddles. And the chief was yet to come – in fact Hittite was an Indo-European language! This entailed another problem: the means and the people were Indo-European … “(Volkov, N. Forgetful.” Hittites. Unknown empire in Asia Minor “). As can be countered this mess and rather primitive ideas? That in addition to the phrase “Het zhegyIe!”, There is still the Circassians? And there is still much that is stored in the traditions of the Circassian people in the songs, in language, rituals, knowledge about ourselves. Scientific expedition to collect vintage songs Circassians in the 30 years of the twentieth century, has found the song on bzhedugskom dialect Circassians. We present here the lyrics translated into the Russian language: “The Hittites our grandfathers, the ancient tribe are, legendary belief. Hittite kingdom great for large sea lies, becoming famous, is expanding. His border to Egypt brought the Hittites, Ramses – King of Egypt Unhappy with this war begins. The Hittites their knowledge in all aspects of bringing governor of Egypt – Pharaoh Ramses comes to the Hittites, the Agreement concluded together. Both sides were related … ” As they say – no comment … There are examples of linguistic and Abkhaz language, which are related to the Circassian. In the vernacular of the Abkhaz There is one very interesting expression. When the Abkhaz want to say the phrase, “Mother Tongue”, he says: “A-Ha Tay byzshaa”, which literally translated into Russian, as: – “Hutt language.” In addition, all of the Circassian dialects to ask the man – “who are you?”, You say, ‘ue uhet? “, Which literally translated -” you Hittite? “That is, in the semantic meaning:” you own? ” “You is ours.” At the Circassians and today are fairly common names with the root “huts”, which are conserved Hittite past – Khatko (Hetykue) Hatyzh (Hetyzh) Atazhukin (Hetezhykue), as well as the names – Hetu, Hete, Hetyze etc.; also one of the Circassian Peoples called – hatukaytsy. All this is knowledge of the Circassian people of its glorious past, of itself, so they are closer to the truth to common sense. Are robust and scientists such statements: “On the other side of science are also established undeniable traits of kinship of the Caucasian languages ​​with some now dead languages ​​of the Near East, in particular protohettskih language. This last, as it turns out, is particularly close to the Abkhaz-Adyghe languages, in particular Ubykh. ” Talking about the relationship “protohettskih” language with Adyghe-Abkhaz GAMelikishvili G. writes: “The use of prefixes as morphological elements, as well as many other effects of morphological structure of the language actually brings him to the highlanders Caucasian languages ​​(Ubykh, Circassian, Abazinian). ST Eremyan also classifies ancient Abkhazian-Circassian tribes to protohettskih ethnic world. ” According to the famous Russian author Alexander aces, “protohetty” Hatta and historical Atlanteans – they are different names for one and the same people. The author writes: “So, defined the location of Atlantis – a real country Dardanovogo killed in the flood. Inhabited this country highly developed nation – Atlanta, more Hutts, protohetty. Atlantean culture has had a huge impact on the culture of the surrounding nations, including the Slav. ” . need to pay attention to the following. As described above, and Science and the Bible, and the usual popularized the view is called the Hittites different “subjects”, thereby contradicting one another.And they do not know for certain which of these “entities” referred to himself as the Hittites. On the other side of the Circassians Hittites no one calls, but they call themselves, and see themselves as descendants of the ancient people of this particular. Why there was such confusion in terms of why the Indo-European component of the knowledge of the Hittites came to the fore, and “protohettskih” component remains in the shade and accordingly the value of the Circassians and their knowledge of it are invisible, and even unknown to science? After all, no doubt, and it shows, as they say, to the naked eye, that the knowledge of the Hittites, as well as their own country and their history is made ​​up of two components – neindoevropeyskoy and Indo-European. first cause confusion and the fact that, in modern terms, an Indo-European component has a greater “public relations”, that the discoverers of the Hittites – the Europeans themselves. So that they attach great importance to “own” the Indo-European component – is completely natural. The second reason – it is, of course, is that the very discovery of the civilization of the Hittites, and deciphering texts took place in the late XIX – early XX centuries. – That is, in the heyday – “Indo-European ideas.” Then science behaved like this: find a cart, which once ran past the so-called “Indo-European” and immediately Science stated: “This is our cart!”, Thus, never noticing that in the cart, then sat two Africans. .. Science, which itself is Indo-European, by definition, opening the Hittites, Indo-Europeans called them. It was a powerful civilization, a rival of Egypt, the discoverer of iron, and the temptation to call it the first Indo-European civilization was very large. Especially cuneiform tablets were found on a hitherto unknown Indo-European language. So firmly established opinion: the Hittites – this is the first Indo-Europeans, who built a civilization equal to ancient Egypt, and so on … Huttese primordial element has been left in the shadows, although he now lies on the surface, but this topic is now almost do not work out. If you develop it, the Indo-European component will lose a lot. Here are some details that lie on the surface, but in the “shadow”: 1. Prior to Asia Minor began to appear Indo-Europeans – there was already a highly developed civilization, and strangers to it did not add anything significant. We can say that they have come to a ready-made. The fact that came to Asia Minor, Indo-Europeans were below the level of culture – also known. 2. The aliens have not won territory Hatti – for centuries they gradually settled and assimilated among the local population. 3. The pivotal element of culture, and the main control – it is a religion. It has remained the same as before the Indo-European language of the sacred ritual was pre-Indo – Hutt.Even the name of the gods remained Hutt. 4. And the Caucasian country Ashuyya and Maikop culture, and the Hittite empire – all links in a continuous chain. Hittites consider separately – it’s just not seeing the whole historical picture as a whole. After all, Country Hattie was not an island of civilization, and was part of a larger one world along the southern and eastern coast of the Black Sea, albeit with separate centers, but with the kindred tribes. 5. There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans at least somewhat dominated in the Land of Hatti. Either in politics or in culture or in religion, they do not sway. Even the situation is somewhat the opposite. It is known that most of the kings wore Hutt, not Indo-European names. Religion has not changed under the influence of newcomers. And the quote is another fact: “The merger of the Indo-Europeans with native tribes in the Hutt Central Asia Minor formed Hittite ethnic group, who created around the middle of the XVIII century. BC. e. powerful Hittite state, fully embrace the rich cultural traditions of the Hutt “(GG Giorgadze.” Ancient History “, 1989). 6. Hittites called themselves, not Indo-Europeans, and the Hutts – and now continue to call themselves Circassians. However, I might say, why then Hutt language in the Land of Hatti was dead, preserved only in religious texts and rituals, and became the Indo-European language of the proceedings, diplomacy Hetskom tsarstve.I is it really? This question is answered scientist Gordon Childe, in his book “Aryans – the founders of European civilization”: “First of all, the material that we have at our disposal, and this plate from the state archives of Hittite kings in Boghazkoy reflects only the language in which the said the Hittites in Cappadocia, and on this basis it is impossible to draw any conclusions regarding the other “Hittites”, for example, those who lived in Carchemish in northern Syria. Moreover, now it is clear that even in Cappadocia, there was a large number of languages: Pali, Mitanni and protohettskih. On the latter should pay particular attention, as he left behind their own written records. There is no doubt that the “Hittites” can not be attributed to a number of Indo-Europeans. Another thing dialect, which themselves scribes called “our language”, no doubt experienced the Indo-European influence. ” It is a pity of course that Gordon Childe did not know that the Circassians have an expression – “Be Hett!” – this would make it even more convinced in correctness of his conclusions. Sam Hutt language, of course, refers to a group of Adygea abhazzskoy-Caucasian language family, and as complex as the Circassian Ubykh, Abkhazian languages ​​.. Many native language Hutt could move to a simpler Indo-European language, especially in the field of public administration. Similar examples in the history of the Circassians were later – Circassian Mamluk sultans, ruled an empire in Arabic. A modern Circassians in Turkey have moved into Turkish, to both the public and easier language than their mother tongue. Apparently, this happened in the Land of Hatti, where more than a simple Indo-European language has spread rapidly multiethnic empire as more acceptable as an international and local Hutt complex language remained as a spoken language and the sacred. Otherwise, as modern scientists say if hatsky language completely disappeared back in those days, remaining only in religious texts, and became a dead language, then how to have survived the phrase – “Het zhegyIe!”?To answer this question, we need to show the contradictions that exist in science – hettologii. To do this, we present a table in which the left-hand side – well-established scientific or become popular theses (red font), and the right part of the – counter or knowledge of the Circassian people about themselves (blue): 1. The Hittites – Indo-Europeans. 1. Yes, indeed, among the ethnic group, called “Hittites”, was a significant Indo-European com-ponents. Indo-Europeans but they did not call themselves – “Hittite.” This exonym by the name of the country, the inhabitants of which they were, and that existed before them. Hittites called themselves natives – Hatta (“protohetty”). And now in the modern world by the Hittites called themselves Circassians. 2. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, the creators of advanced civilization and powers equal to ancient Egypt. 2. Civilization Hutt existed long before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor. 3.Anitas king – the first king of the Hittites 3. And to Anitas in the Land of Hatti kings were, however, Anitas first king caught in the record which read our contemporaries scientists. It is a mistake to begin with Anitas history of the Hittites. 4. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans – the discoverers of iron. 4. Iron was known Hutts before the Indo-Europeans came to Central Asia Minor. This is indicated by the message of Pharaoh king of Hatti with a request to send him an iron dagger. The message is dated 2000 BC. e. 5. -Indo-European Hittites ruled Asia Minor from 1750 to 1200 years BC 5.There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans were somewhat dominated the rest of the population of the country of Hatti. Rather the reverse: most famous kings wore Hutt names. 6. The Indo-Europeans conquered Asia Minor and established the Empire. 6. In the literature, many times repeated, that the conquest was not, and there was a gradual settlement of the Indo-Europeans in the Land of Hatti, and integration. From the above we can draw the following conclusions: 1. Necessary to create a science Circassian Abhazalogii to live with the position of the fragments of an ancient civilization – Cherkess (Circassians), Ubykhs the Abaza, Abkhaz to reconsider the knowledge of the Hittites, the country Ashuyya, ancient Mesopotamia, the Maikop culture, not separately, but in unity. It also requires knowledge of the languages ​​and dialects of all these Caucasian peoples. 2. The opening of which John Kolaruso reported in 2011 (details in a later chapter), once again confirms that the future Europeans and future Circassians in the past for a long time been in interaction with each other. 3. There is a popular belief about the Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, who created the Hittite power does not hold water. We can only speak Otomi that the country of Hatti, there is some component of the Indo-European. At the same backbone political model – Confederation controlled by a single ruler, and in fact has a socialist system of government – that is nonsense for the Ancient World, remained. 4. The only pieces of Hatti Countries that existed before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor – it’s Circassians and Abkhazians. And for them, “Hittite” – an ancient self. 5. History of the Hittites did not have a gap between the XII and XVIII centuries. BC. e. This is exactly the time when the Europeans future and the future of the Circassians, Abkhazians coexisted within the same public education. It was during this period of time the Europeans borrowed from the future of the future of the Circassians, Abkhaz culture, which became the basis of European civilization, not to mention the genes which, according to the latest findings, in large enough quantities is among the Europeans. 6. History in the case of the Hittites once again shows its bias and clumsiness, and the “authority” prodavlivaya “best” ideas, and being by definition the “Indo-European” – pulls the blanket over himself. Now I want to give an interesting example of the Bible in the Hittite subject. It is the story of perhaps the most famous of the Hittites – Uriah Hettiyanine. This character of the Old Testament was in the list of the best soldiers of the governor of the state of Israel – King David. It tells about 11 head of the 2nd Book of Kings. All who read the Old Testament, remember this story. The act of Uriah the Hittite is completely separate from the other acts and the acts described in the Bible. What is the difference? You might ask. The difference in motivation. Bible is full of stories about the various exploits, deeds, deeds. They are committed in the name of faith, the Lord of kings, women, brothers. There were acts committed because of lust for power, greed, and the other was the cause of meanness, selfishness, etc. There were, of course, act in the name of love and compassion. That is, in each case has its own motive. And Uriah act is fundamentally different from all the others, described in the Old Testament, it was his motivation. Let’s remember how it was. Uriah the Hittite, refuses to go home to sleep with his wife, thereby violating the order of their king – David. David himself so wanted to hide the cause of his wife’s pregnancy Uriah – Bathsheba.Pregnancy, as we learn from the same story, came from the fact that at the time, as long as Uriah was at war, King David’s wife forced him to close and she suffered from it. If Uriah at least one night spent at home, it would be possible to justify pregnancy Beersheba. So King David through cunning attempts to send Uriah home to spend the night. And Uriah refuses to go home at night, although it is an order of the king, and, as we know the word gentleman – the law for his servants. But no, Uriah did not go home and spend the night at the gate of the palace, along with security. He did not comply with an order of the king, and should any of its own internal installation. And this set is stronger than the word of a king, though the king’s word, and the law for his servants. At the very same King David about this setup is not even know, or he would have chosen a different tactical trick against Uriah. Some kind of ethical standard, unknown to King David and the other Israelis, Uriah does not allow to execute the order of the king. Any other warrior in place of Uriah, who came from the war, and who had not seen for a long time my wife would love to obey the order of the king, without even thinking. But not the Hittite. He is the king says, “… and my lord Joab and the servants of my lord are in the field, and I went to his house to eat and drink, and sleep with my wife? I swear by thy life and the life of your soul, I will not do! “This behavior says that Uriah the Hittite is subject to ethical standards that at a later time, known as the Circassians -” zekIue habze “- the unwritten law of marching. It is part of the Circassian ethics – Adyghe Khabza. During the raid, campaign, war, every soldier obeys the “zekIue habze.” The fundamental principle of the law marching sounds like this: “The interests of the group (party, army detachment) is always more important than the interests of any single voina.Ni separately taken warrior can not have any privileges and benefits as opposed to the other before the end of the campaign (war, the raid) . Other important principles of this Code are as follows: “To leave the battlefield for any reason, except for tactical reasons, leaving the other – means to cover their name and shame their children forever” “The commander elected only during the campaign, and only by their personal qualities.” “Commander leaves last battlefield. ” ‘surrender – the biggest disgrace. ” These principles and requirements remained the Circassians in their military culture until the end of the XIX century. And in the understanding of Uriah – to go to bed with his wife at the time, when his combat comrades in the field, it equates to flee from the battlefield. Such an understanding in principle characteristic of Hittite. The only possible way out for himself, he sees – to spend the night with the same soldiers like himself, to the protection of the palace, with soldiers who are directly in the line of military obyazonnostey. Thus, Uriah creates for himself the situation in which he can consider himself not run away from the battlefield. King David was re-invited me Uriah the next day and “eating with him and drank, and he made ​​him drunk.” King hoped that Uriah drunk certainly will spend the night home to his wife. However, it is not, is not, – sleeps with security at the gate of the palace.Even napivshiysya Uriah did not violate its internal charter. It must be emphasized that no one ever would have blamed him if he slept at home. Only his inner principle and military upbringing, his conscience and his judge. It is this military principle, unknown to the Israelis would not allow the will of the king of Uriah. If you say that this is not surprising, such a principle would not only be from the Hittites and the Circassians you would be wrong, because the Jews of this is not known, it is very clear from the biblical story. seems that Uriah repeatedly said senior “Het zhegyIe” – “Be Hett!” – that is, “to multiply the glory of the Hittites!”. And he actually went on and increase in the millennium. Uriah the Hittite – the symbol of this military honor. The honor cost him his life. Uriah name a few times in the history of the Circassians, and probably in the pre-Christian Circassia was quite common. 1. From the ancient inscriptions known – Ware Hetu – full namesake of Uriah the Hittite, of which four thousand years ago wrote an Assyrian king Narasmin. This inscription is carved in stone. Says that of the Western Caucasus thousand years ago came under the leadership of the Hutts Ware Hetu and captured the city of Akkad, and built a city Carchemish and Thapsek. 2. Ueri Dade – the so-called leader Kasogs (ancestors of the Circassians), who fought a duel with the Russian Tmutarakan Prince Mstislav in 1022 in the Russian chronicles the name sounds like – “Rededi.” 3. Ueri Dade – the so-called People’s Court judge, in a story about a wise man Zhabagiev cauldron. Ueri Zhabagiev was the forerunner of the People’s Court. In all cases, except for the story about the judge, the name of Uriah are soldiers – unit commanders. Perhaps this is a military post, or some kind of nickname given to colleagues for military merit, because in Circassian: “Uerra!” – Forward! “Ware” – a war, a war.”Uerubyd” – a prisoner of war. “Uerysh” – Warhorse . “Uerk” – a professional soldier, officer. (The letter “E” in the Circassian language-A short beep) Apparently, the English word – “war” and the Bulgarian – “Thief” – derived from this ancient root .. Wife Uriah the Hittite, which later became the wife of King David and King Solomon’s mother, was called – Bathsheba that twisted like – Bathsheba. “Baie-it-schabe” in the language of the Circassians read: Baie many IT “containing” Schabe, “gentle.” Just-“tender”. As the name for a girl in today’s Circassian world, the name of the organic and reminiscent of the Circassian names such as – NefIytsIe – “black-eyed” Pague – “snub” Naschhue – “gray-eyed”, Schabe – “soft, tender”. The name of her grandfather – Ahithophel. This name contains three Circassian roots: “het” – Hittite, “fe” – appearance, form and “lly” – man. “A” – is common in the Abkhaz-Adyghe language group prefix pointing to a specific object specifying affix. Linguists are trying to translate the name from the Hebrew, the result is – “brother of madness.” Agree, not the most appropriate name for the adviser of King David and indeed the name allogichno for any nation. and “protohettskih” component remains in the shadows, and accordingly the value of the Circassians and their knowledge of it are invisible, and even unknown to science? After all, no doubt, and it shows, as they say, to the naked eye, that the knowledge of the Hittites, as well as their own country and their history is made ​​up of two components – neindoevropeyskoy and Indo-European. first cause confusion and the fact that, in modern terms, an Indo-European component has a greater “public relations”, that the discoverers of the Hittites – the Europeans themselves. So that they attach great importance to “own” the Indo-European component – is completely natural. The second reason – it is, of course, is that the very discovery of the civilization of the Hittites, and deciphering texts took place in the late XIX – early XX centuries. – That is, in the heyday – “Indo-European ideas.” Then science behaved like this: find a cart, which once ran past the so-called “Indo-European” and immediately Science stated: “This is our cart!”, Thus, never noticing that in the cart, then sat two Africans. .. Science, which itself is Indo-European, by definition, opening the Hittites, Indo-Europeans called them. It was a powerful civilization, a rival of Egypt, the discoverer of iron, and the temptation to call it the first Indo-European civilization was very large. Especially cuneiform tablets were found on a hitherto unknown Indo-European language. So firmly established opinion: the Hittites – this is the first Indo-Europeans, who built a civilization equal to ancient Egypt, and so on … Huttese primordial element has been left in the shadows, although he now lies on the surface, but this topic is now almost do not work out. If you develop it, the Indo-European component will lose a lot.Here are some details that lie on the surface, but in the “shadow”: 1. Prior to Asia Minor began to appear Indo-Europeans – there was already a highly developed civilization, and strangers to it did not add anything significant. We can say that they have come to a ready-made. The fact that came to Asia Minor, Indo-Europeans were below the level of culture – also known. 2. The aliens have not won territory Hatti – for centuries they gradually settled and assimilated among the local population. 3. The pivotal element of culture, and the main control – it is a religion. It has remained the same as before the Indo-European language of the sacred ritual was pre-Indo – Hutt. Even the name of the gods remained Hutt. 4. And the Caucasian country Ashuyya and Maikop culture, and the Hittite empire – all links in a continuous chain. Hittites consider separately – it’s just not seeing the whole historical picture as a whole. After all, Country Hattie was not an island of civilization, and was part of a larger one world along the southern and eastern coast of the Black Sea, albeit with separate centers, but with the kindred tribes. 5. There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans at least somewhat dominated in the Land of Hatti. Either in politics or in culture or in religion, they do not sway. Even the situation is somewhat the opposite. It is known that most of the kings wore Hutt, not Indo-European names. Religion has not changed under the influence of newcomers. And the quote is another fact: “The merger of the Indo-Europeans with native tribes in the Hutt Central Asia Minor formed Hittite ethnic group, who created around the middle of the XVIII century. BC. e. powerful Hittite state, fully embrace the rich cultural traditions of the Hutt “(GG Giorgadze.” Ancient History “, 1989). 6. Hittites called themselves, not Indo-Europeans, and the Hutts – and now continue to call themselves Circassians. However, I might say, why then Hutt language in the Land of Hatti was dead, preserved only in religious texts and rituals, and became the Indo-European language of the proceedings, diplomacy Hetskom tsarstve.I is it really? This question is answered scientist Gordon Childe, in his book “Aryans – the founders of European civilization”: “First of all, the material that we have at our disposal, and this plate from the state archives of Hittite kings in Boghazkoy reflects only the language in which the said the Hittites in Cappadocia, and on this basis it is impossible to draw any conclusions regarding the other “Hittites”, for example, those who lived in Carchemish in northern Syria. Moreover, now it is clear that even in Cappadocia, there was a large number of languages: Pali, Mitanni and protohettskih. On the latter should pay particular attention, as he left behind their own written records. There is no doubt that the “Hittites” can not be attributed to a number of Indo-Europeans. Another thing dialect, which themselves scribes called “our language”, no doubt experienced the Indo-European influence. ” It is a pity of course that Gordon Childe did not know that the Circassians have an expression – “Be Hett!” – this would make it even more convinced in correctness of his conclusions. Sam Hutt language, of course, refers to a group of Adygea abhazzskoy-Caucasian language family, and as complex as the Circassian Ubykh, Abkhazian languages ​​.. Many native language Hutt could move to a simpler Indo-European language, especially in the field of public administration. Similar examples in the history of the Circassians were later – Circassian Mamluk sultans, ruled an empire in Arabic. A modern Circassians in Turkey have moved into Turkish, to both the public and easier language than their mother tongue. Apparently, this happened in the Land of Hatti, where more than a simple Indo-European language has spread rapidly multiethnic empire as more acceptable as an international and local Hutt complex language remained as a spoken language and the sacred. Otherwise, as modern scientists say if hatsky language completely disappeared back in those days, remaining only in religious texts, and became a dead language, then how to have survived the phrase – “Het zhegyIe!”?To answer this question, we need to show the contradictions that exist in science – hettologii. To do this, we present a table in which the left-hand side – well-established scientific or become popular theses (red font), and the right part of the – counter or knowledge of the Circassian people about themselves (blue): 1. The Hittites – Indo-Europeans. 1. Yes, indeed, among the ethnic group, called “Hittites”, was a significant Indo-European com-ponents. Indo-Europeans but they did not call themselves – “Hittite.” This exonym by the name of the country, the inhabitants of which they were, and that existed before them. Hittites called themselves natives – Hatta (“protohetty”). And now in the modern world by the Hittites called themselves Circassians. 2. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, the creators of advanced civilization and powers equal to ancient Egypt. 2. Civilization Hutt existed long before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor. 3.Anitas king – the first king of the Hittites 3. And to Anitas in the Land of Hatti kings were, however, Anitas first king caught in the record which read our contemporaries scientists. It is a mistake to begin with Anitas history of the Hittites. 4. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans – the discoverers of iron. 4. Iron was known Hutts before the Indo-Europeans came to Central Asia Minor. This is indicated by the message of Pharaoh king of Hatti with a request to send him an iron dagger. The message is dated 2000 BC. e. 5. -Indo-European Hittites ruled Asia Minor from 1750 to 1200 years BC 5.There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans were somewhat dominated the rest of the population of the country of Hatti. Rather the reverse: most famous kings wore Hutt names. 6. The Indo-Europeans conquered Asia Minor and established the Empire. 6. In the literature, many times repeated, that the conquest was not, and there was a gradual settlement of the Indo-Europeans in the Land of Hatti, and integration. From the above we can draw the following conclusions: 1. Necessary to create a science Circassian Abhazalogii to live with the position of the fragments of an ancient civilization – Cherkess (Circassians), Ubykhs the Abaza, Abkhaz to reconsider the knowledge of the Hittites, the country Ashuyya, ancient Mesopotamia, the Maikop culture, not separately, but in unity. It also requires knowledge of the languages ​​and dialects of all these Caucasian peoples. 2. The opening of which John Kolaruso reported in 2011 (details in a later chapter), once again confirms that the future Europeans and future Circassians in the past for a long time been in interaction with each other. 3. There is a popular belief about the Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, who created the Hittite power does not hold water. We can only speak Otomi that the country of Hatti, there is some component of the Indo-European. At the same backbone political model – Confederation controlled by a single ruler, and in fact has a socialist system of government – that is nonsense for the Ancient World, remained. 4. The only pieces of Hatti Countries that existed before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor – it’s Circassians and Abkhazians. And for them, “Hittite” – an ancient self. 5. History of the Hittites did not have a gap between the XII and XVIII centuries. BC. e. This is exactly the time when the Europeans future and the future of the Circassians, Abkhazians coexisted within the same public education. It was during this period of time the Europeans borrowed from the future of the future of the Circassians, Abkhaz culture, which became the basis of European civilization, not to mention the genes which, according to the latest findings, in large enough quantities is among the Europeans. 6. History in the case of the Hittites once again shows its bias and clumsiness, and the “authority” prodavlivaya “best” ideas, and being by definition the “Indo-European” – pulls the blanket over himself. Now I want to give an interesting example of the Bible in the Hittite subject. It is the story of perhaps the most famous of the Hittites – Uriah Hettiyanine. This character of the Old Testament was in the list of the best soldiers of the governor of the state of Israel – King David. It tells about 11 head of the 2nd Book of Kings. All who read the Old Testament, remember this story. The act of Uriah the Hittite is completely separate from the other acts and the acts described in the Bible. What is the difference? You might ask. The difference in motivation. Bible is full of stories about the various exploits, deeds, deeds. They are committed in the name of faith, the Lord of kings, women, brothers. There were acts committed because of lust for power, greed, and the other was the cause of meanness, selfishness, etc. There were, of course, act in the name of love and compassion. That is, in each case has its own motive. And Uriah act is fundamentally different from all the others, described in the Old Testament, it was his motivation. Let’s remember how it was. Uriah the Hittite, refuses to go home to sleep with his wife, thereby violating the order of their king – David. David himself so wanted to hide the cause of his wife’s pregnancy Uriah – Bathsheba.Pregnancy, as we learn from the same story, came from the fact that at the time, as long as Uriah was at war, King David’s wife forced him to close and she suffered from it. If Uriah at least one night spent at home, it would be possible to justify pregnancy Beersheba. So King David through cunning attempts to send Uriah home to spend the night. And Uriah refuses to go home at night, although it is an order of the king, and, as we know the word gentleman – the law for his servants. But no, Uriah did not go home and spend the night at the gate of the palace, along with security. He did not comply with an order of the king, and should any of its own internal installation. And this set is stronger than the word of a king, though the king’s word, and the law for his servants. At the very same King David about this setup is not even know, or he would have chosen a different tactical trick against Uriah. Some kind of ethical standard, unknown to King David and the other Israelis, Uriah does not allow to execute the order of the king. Any other warrior in place of Uriah, who came from the war, and who had not seen for a long time my wife would love to obey the order of the king, without even thinking. But not the Hittite. He is the king says, “… and my lord Joab and the servants of my lord are in the field, and I went to his house to eat and drink, and sleep with my wife? I swear by thy life and the life of your soul, I will not do! “This behavior says that Uriah the Hittite is subject to ethical standards that at a later time, known as the Circassians -” zekIue habze “- the unwritten law of marching. It is part of the Circassian ethics – Adyghe Khabza. During the raid, campaign, war, every soldier obeys the “zekIue habze.” The fundamental principle of the law marching sounds like this: “The interests of the group (party, army detachment) is always more important than the interests of any single voina.Ni separately taken warrior can not have any privileges and benefits as opposed to the other before the end of the campaign (war, the raid) . Other important principles of this Code are as follows: “To leave the battlefield for any reason, except for tactical reasons, leaving the other – means to cover their name and shame their children forever” “The commander elected only during the campaign, and only by their personal qualities.” “Commander leaves last battlefield. ” ‘surrender – the biggest disgrace. ” These principles and requirements remained the Circassians in their military culture until the end of the XIX century. And in the understanding of Uriah – to go to bed with his wife at the time, when his combat comrades in the field, it equates to flee from the battlefield. Such an understanding in principle characteristic of Hittite. The only possible way out for himself, he sees – to spend the night with the same soldiers like himself, to the protection of the palace, with soldiers who are directly in the line of military obyazonnostey. Thus, Uriah creates for himself the situation in which he can consider himself not run away from the battlefield. King David was re-invited me Uriah the next day and “eating with him and drank, and he made ​​him drunk.” King hoped that Uriah drunk certainly will spend the night home to his wife. However, it is not, is not, – sleeps with security at the gate of the palace.Even napivshiysya Uriah did not violate its internal charter. It must be emphasized that no one ever would have blamed him if he slept at home. Only his inner principle and military upbringing, his conscience and his judge. It is this military principle, unknown to the Israelis would not allow the will of the king of Uriah. If you say that this is not surprising, such a principle would not only be from the Hittites and the Circassians you would be wrong, because the Jews of this is not known, it is very clear from the biblical story. seems that Uriah repeatedly said senior “Het zhegyIe” – “Be Hett!” – that is, “to multiply the glory of the Hittites!”. And he actually went on and increase in the millennium. Uriah the Hittite – the symbol of this military honor. The honor cost him his life. Uriah name a few times in the history of the Circassians, and probably in the pre-Christian Circassia was quite common. 1. From the ancient inscriptions known – Ware Hetu – full namesake of Uriah the Hittite, of which four thousand years ago wrote an Assyrian king Narasmin. This inscription is carved in stone. Says that of the Western Caucasus thousand years ago came under the leadership of the Hutts Ware Hetu and captured the city of Akkad, and built a city Carchemish and Thapsek. 2. Ueri Dade – the so-called leader Kasogs (ancestors of the Circassians), who fought a duel with the Russian Tmutarakan Prince Mstislav in 1022 in the Russian chronicles the name sounds like – “Rededi.” 3. Ueri Dade – the so-called People’s Court judge, in a story about a wise man Zhabagiev cauldron. Ueri Zhabagiev was the forerunner of the People’s Court. In all cases, except for the story about the judge, the name of Uriah are soldiers – unit commanders. Perhaps this is a military post, or some kind of nickname given to colleagues for military merit, because in Circassian: “Uerra!” – Forward! “Ware” – a war, a war.”Uerubyd” – a prisoner of war. “Uerysh” – Warhorse . “Uerk” – a professional soldier, officer. (The letter “E” in the Circassian language-A short beep) Apparently, the English word – “war” and the Bulgarian – “Thief” – derived from this ancient root .. Wife Uriah the Hittite, which later became the wife of King David and King Solomon’s mother, was called – Bathsheba that twisted like – Bathsheba. “Baie-it-schabe” in the language of the Circassians read: Baie many IT “containing” Schabe, “gentle.” Just-“tender”. As the name for a girl in today’s Circassian world, the name of the organic and reminiscent of the Circassian names such as – NefIytsIe – “black-eyed” Pague – “snub” Naschhue – “gray-eyed”, Schabe – “soft, tender”. The name of her grandfather – Ahithophel. This name contains three Circassian roots: “het” – Hittite, “fe” – appearance, form and “lly” – man. “A” – is common in the Abkhaz-Adyghe language group prefix pointing to a specific object specifying affix. Linguists are trying to translate the name from the Hebrew, the result is – “brother of madness.” Agree, not the most appropriate name for the adviser of King David and indeed the name allogichno for any nation. and “protohettskih” component remains in the shadows, and accordingly the value of the Circassians and their knowledge of it are invisible, and even unknown to science? After all, no doubt, and it shows, as they say, to the naked eye, that the knowledge of the Hittites, as well as their own country and their history is made ​​up of two components – neindoevropeyskoy and Indo-European. first cause confusion and the fact that, in modern terms, an Indo-European component has a greater “public relations”, that the discoverers of the Hittites – the Europeans themselves. So that they attach great importance to “own” the Indo-European component – is completely natural. The second reason – it is, of course, is that the very discovery of the civilization of the Hittites, and deciphering texts took place in the late XIX – early XX centuries. – That is, in the heyday – “Indo-European ideas.” Then science behaved like this: find a cart, which once ran past the so-called “Indo-European” and immediately Science stated: “This is our cart!”, Thus, never noticing that in the cart, then sat two Africans. .. Science, which itself is Indo-European, by definition, opening the Hittites, Indo-Europeans called them. It was a powerful civilization, a rival of Egypt, the discoverer of iron, and the temptation to call it the first Indo-European civilization was very large. Especially cuneiform tablets were found on a hitherto unknown Indo-European language. So firmly established opinion: the Hittites – this is the first Indo-Europeans, who built a civilization equal to ancient Egypt, and so on … Huttese primordial element has been left in the shadows, although he now lies on the surface, but this topic is now almost do not work out. If you develop it, the Indo-European component will lose a lot.Here are some details that lie on the surface, but in the “shadow”: 1. Prior to Asia Minor began to appear Indo-Europeans – there was already a highly developed civilization, and strangers to it did not add anything significant. We can say that they have come to a ready-made. The fact that came to Asia Minor, Indo-Europeans were below the level of culture – also known. 2. The aliens have not won territory Hatti – for centuries they gradually settled and assimilated among the local population. 3. The pivotal element of culture, and the main control – it is a religion. It has remained the same as before the Indo-European language of the sacred ritual was pre-Indo – Hutt. Even the name of the gods remained Hutt. 4. And the Caucasian country Ashuyya and Maikop culture, and the Hittite empire – all links in a continuous chain. Hittites consider separately – it’s just not seeing the whole historical picture as a whole. After all, Country Hattie was not an island of civilization, and was part of a larger one world along the southern and eastern coast of the Black Sea, albeit with separate centers, but with the kindred tribes. 5. There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans at least somewhat dominated in the Land of Hatti. Either in politics or in culture or in religion, they do not sway. Even the situation is somewhat the opposite. It is known that most of the kings wore Hutt, not Indo-European names. Religion has not changed under the influence of newcomers. And the quote is another fact: “The merger of the Indo-Europeans with native tribes in the Hutt Central Asia Minor formed Hittite ethnic group, who created around the middle of the XVIII century. BC. e. powerful Hittite state, fully embrace the rich cultural traditions of the Hutt “(GG Giorgadze.” Ancient History “, 1989). 6. Hittites called themselves, not Indo-Europeans, and the Hutts – and now continue to call themselves Circassians. However, I might say, why then Hutt language in the Land of Hatti was dead, preserved only in religious texts and rituals, and became the Indo-European language of the proceedings, diplomacy Hetskom tsarstve.I is it really? This question is answered scientist Gordon Childe, in his book “Aryans – the founders of European civilization”: “First of all, the material that we have at our disposal, and this plate from the state archives of Hittite kings in Boghazkoy reflects only the language in which the said the Hittites in Cappadocia, and on this basis it is impossible to draw any conclusions regarding the other “Hittites”, for example, those who lived in Carchemish in northern Syria. Moreover, now it is clear that even in Cappadocia, there was a large number of languages: Pali, Mitanni and protohettskih. On the latter should pay particular attention, as he left behind their own written records. There is no doubt that the “Hittites” can not be attributed to a number of Indo-Europeans. Another thing dialect, which themselves scribes called “our language”, no doubt experienced the Indo-European influence. ” It is a pity of course that Gordon Childe did not know that the Circassians have an expression – “Be Hett!” – this would make it even more convinced in correctness of his conclusions. Sam Hutt language, of course, refers to a group of Adygea abhazzskoy-Caucasian language family, and as complex as the Circassian Ubykh, Abkhazian languages ​​.. Many native language Hutt could move to a simpler Indo-European language, especially in the field of public administration. Similar examples in the history of the Circassians were later – Circassian Mamluk sultans, ruled an empire in Arabic. A modern Circassians in Turkey have moved into Turkish, to both the public and easier language than their mother tongue. Apparently, this happened in the Land of Hatti, where more than a simple Indo-European language has spread rapidly multiethnic empire as more acceptable as an international and local Hutt complex language remained as a spoken language and the sacred. Otherwise, as modern scientists say if hatsky language completely disappeared back in those days, remaining only in religious texts, and became a dead language, then how to have survived the phrase – “Het zhegyIe!”?To answer this question, we need to show the contradictions that exist in science – hettologii. To do this, we present a table in which the left-hand side – well-established scientific or become popular theses (red font), and the right part of the – counter or knowledge of the Circassian people about themselves (blue): 1. The Hittites – Indo-Europeans. 1. Yes, indeed, among the ethnic group, called “Hittites”, was a significant Indo-European com-ponents. Indo-Europeans but they did not call themselves – “Hittite.” This exonym by the name of the country, the inhabitants of which they were, and that existed before them. Hittites called themselves natives – Hatta (“protohetty”). And now in the modern world by the Hittites called themselves Circassians. 2. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, the creators of advanced civilization and powers equal to ancient Egypt. 2. Civilization Hutt existed long before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor. 3.Anitas king – the first king of the Hittites 3. And to Anitas in the Land of Hatti kings were, however, Anitas first king caught in the record which read our contemporaries scientists. It is a mistake to begin with Anitas history of the Hittites. 4. The Hittites, the Indo-Europeans – the discoverers of iron. 4. Iron was known Hutts before the Indo-Europeans came to Central Asia Minor. This is indicated by the message of Pharaoh king of Hatti with a request to send him an iron dagger. The message is dated 2000 BC. e. 5. -Indo-European Hittites ruled Asia Minor from 1750 to 1200 years BC 5.There is no evidence that the Indo-Europeans were somewhat dominated the rest of the population of the country of Hatti. Rather the reverse: most famous kings wore Hutt names. 6. The Indo-Europeans conquered Asia Minor and established the Empire. 6. In the literature, many times repeated, that the conquest was not, and there was a gradual settlement of the Indo-Europeans in the Land of Hatti, and integration. From the above we can draw the following conclusions: 1. Necessary to create a science Circassian Abhazalogii to live with the position of the fragments of an ancient civilization – Cherkess (Circassians), Ubykhs the Abaza, Abkhaz to reconsider the knowledge of the Hittites, the country Ashuyya, ancient Mesopotamia, the Maikop culture, not separately, but in unity. It also requires knowledge of the languages ​​and dialects of all these Caucasian peoples. 2. The opening of which John Kolaruso reported in 2011 (details in a later chapter), once again confirms that the future Europeans and future Circassians in the past for a long time been in interaction with each other. 3. There is a popular belief about the Hittites, the Indo-Europeans, who created the Hittite power does not hold water. We can only speak Otomi that the country of Hatti, there is some component of the Indo-European. At the same backbone political model – Confederation controlled by a single ruler, and in fact has a socialist system of government – that is nonsense for the Ancient World, remained. 4. The only pieces of Hatti Countries that existed before the arrival of Indo-Europeans in Asia Minor – it’s Circassians and Abkhazians. And for them, “Hittite” – an ancient self. 5. History of the Hittites did not have a gap between the XII and XVIII centuries. BC. e. This is exactly the time when the Europeans future and the future of the Circassians, Abkhazians coexisted within the same public education. It was during this period of time the Europeans borrowed from the future of the future of the Circassians, Abkhaz culture, which became the basis of European civilization, not to mention the genes which, according to the latest findings, in large enough quantities is among the Europeans. 6. History in the case of the Hittites once again shows its bias and clumsiness, and the “authority” prodavlivaya “best” ideas, and being by definition the “Indo-European” – pulls the blanket over himself. Now I want to give an interesting example of the Bible in the Hittite subject. It is the story of perhaps the most famous of the Hittites – Uriah Hettiyanine. This character of the Old Testament was in the list of the best soldiers of the governor of the state of Israel – King David. It tells about 11 head of the 2nd Book of Kings. All who read the Old Testament, remember this story. The act of Uriah the Hittite is completely separate from the other acts and the acts described in the Bible. What is the difference? You might ask. The difference in motivation. Bible is full of stories about the various exploits, deeds, deeds. They are committed in the name of faith, the Lord of kings, women, brothers. There were acts committed because of lust for power, greed, and the other was the cause of meanness, selfishness, etc. There were, of course, act in the name of love and compassion. That is, in each case has its own motive. And Uriah act is fundamentally different from all the others, described in the Old Testament, it was his motivation. Let’s remember how it was. Uriah the Hittite, refuses to go home to sleep with his wife, thereby violating the order of their king – David. David himself so wanted to hide the cause of his wife’s pregnancy Uriah – Bathsheba.Pregnancy, as we learn from the same story, came from the fact that at the time, as long as Uriah was at war, King David’s wife forced him to close and she suffered from it. If Uriah at least one night spent at home, it would be possible to justify pregnancy Beersheba. So King David through cunning attempts to send Uriah home to spend the night. And Uriah refuses to go home at night, although it is an order of the king, and, as we know the word gentleman – the law for his servants. But no, Uriah did not go home and spend the night at the gate of the palace, along with security. He did not comply with an order of the king, and should any of its own internal installation. And this set is stronger than the word of a king, though the king’s word, and the law for his servants. At the very same King David about this setup is not even know, or he would have chosen a different tactical trick against Uriah. Some kind of ethical standard, unknown to King David and the other Israelis, Uriah does not allow to execute the order of the king. Any other warrior in place of Uriah, who came from the war, and who had not seen for a long time my wife would love to obey the order of the king, without even thinking. But not the Hittite. He is the king says, “… and my lord Joab and the servants of my lord are in the field, and I went to his house to eat and drink, and sleep with my wife? I swear by thy life and the life of your soul, I will not do! “This behavior says that Uriah the Hittite is subject to ethical standards that at a later time, known as the Circassians -” zekIue habze “- the unwritten law of marching. It is part of the Circassian ethics – Adyghe Khabza. During the raid, campaign, war, every soldier obeys the “zekIue habze.” The fundamental principle of the law marching sounds like this: “The interests of the group (party, army detachment) is always more important than the interests of any single voina.Ni separately taken warrior can not have any privileges and benefits as opposed to the other before the end of the campaign (war, the raid) . Other important principles of this Code are as follows: “To leave the battlefield for any reason, except for tactical reasons, leaving the other – means to cover their name and shame their children forever” “The commander elected only during the campaign, and only by their personal qualities.” “Commander leaves last battlefield. ” ‘surrender – the biggest disgrace. ” These principles and requirements remained the Circassians in their military culture until the end of the XIX century. And in the understanding of Uriah – to go to bed with his wife at the time, when his combat comrades in the field, it equates to flee from the battlefield. Such an understanding in principle characteristic of Hittite. The only possible way out for himself, he sees – to spend the night with the same soldiers like himself, to the protection of the palace, with soldiers who are directly in the line of military obyazonnostey. Thus, Uriah creates for himself the situation in which he can consider himself not run away from the battlefield. King David was re-invited me Uriah the next day and “eating with him and drank, and he made ​​him drunk.” King hoped that Uriah drunk certainly will spend the night home to his wife. However, it is not, is not, – sleeps with security at the gate of the palace.Even napivshiysya Uriah did not violate its internal charter. It must be emphasized that no one ever would have blamed him if he slept at home. Only his inner principle and military upbringing, his conscience and his judge. It is this military principle, unknown to the Israelis would not allow the will of the king of Uriah. If you say that this is not surprising, such a principle would not only be from the Hittites and the Circassians you would be wrong, because the Jews of this is not known, it is very clear from the biblical story. seems that Uriah repeatedly said senior “Het zhegyIe” – “Be Hett!” – that is, “to multiply the glory of the Hittites!”. And he actually went on and increase in the millennium. Uriah the Hittite – the symbol of this military honor. The honor cost him his life. Uriah name a few times in the history of the Circassians, and probably in the pre-Christian Circassia was quite common. 1. From the ancient inscriptions known – Ware Hetu – full namesake of Uriah the Hittite, of which four thousand years ago wrote an Assyrian king Narasmin. This inscription is carved in stone. Says that of the Western Caucasus thousand years ago came under the leadership of the Hutts Ware Hetu and captured the city of Akkad, and built a city Carchemish and Thapsek. 2. Ueri Dade – the so-called leader Kasogs (ancestors of the Circassians), who fought a duel with the Russian Tmutarakan Prince Mstislav in 1022 in the Russian chronicles the name sounds like – “Rededi.” 3. Ueri Dade – the so-called People’s Court judge, in a story about a wise man Zhabagiev cauldron. Ueri Zhabagiev was the forerunner of the People’s Court. In all cases, except for the story about the judge, the name of Uriah are soldiers – unit commanders. Perhaps this is a military post, or some kind of nickname given to colleagues for military merit, because in Circassian: “Uerra!” – Forward! “Ware” – a war, a war.”Uerubyd” – a prisoner of war. “Uerysh” – Warhorse . “Uerk” – a professional soldier, officer. (The letter “E” in the Circassian language-A short beep) Apparently, the English word – “war” and the Bulgarian – “Thief” – derived from this ancient root .. Wife Uriah the Hittite, which later became the wife of King David and King Solomon’s mother, was called – Bathsheba that twisted like – Bathsheba. “Baie-it-schabe” in the language of the Circassians read: Baie many IT “containing” Schabe, “gentle.” Just-“tender”. As the name for a girl in today’s Circassian world, the name of the organic and reminiscent of the Circassian names such as – NefIytsIe – “black-eyed” Pague – “snub” Naschhue – “gray-eyed”, Schabe – “soft, tender”. The name of her grandfather – Ahithophel. This name contains three Circassian roots: “het” – Hittite, “fe” – appearance, form and “lly” – man. “A” – is common in the Abkhaz-Adyghe language group prefix pointing to a specific object specifying affix. Linguists are trying to translate the name from the Hebrew, the result is – “brother of madness.” Agree, not the most appropriate name for the adviser of King David and indeed the name allogichno for any nation. No single soldier can not have any privileges and benefits, unlike other until the end of the campaign (war, the raid). Other important principles of this Code are as follows: “To leave the battlefield for any reason, except for tactical reasons, leaving the other – means to cover their name and shame their children forever” “The commander elected only during the campaign, and only by their personal qualities.” “Commander leaves last battlefield. ” ‘surrender – the biggest disgrace. ” These principles and requirements remained the Circassians in their military culture until the end of the XIX century. And in the understanding of Uriah – to go to bed with his wife at the time, when his combat comrades in the field, it equates to flee from the battlefield. Such an understanding in principle characteristic of Hittite. The only possible way out for himself, he sees – to spend the night with the same soldiers like himself, to the protection of the palace, with soldiers who are directly in the line of military obyazonnostey. Thus, Uriah creates for himself the situation in which he can consider himself not run away from the battlefield. King David was re-invited me Uriah the next day and “eating with him and drank, and he made ​​him drunk.” King hoped that Uriah drunk certainly will spend the night home to his wife. However, it is not, is not, – sleeps with security at the gate of the palace. Even napivshiysya Uriah did not violate its internal charter. It must be emphasized that no one ever would have blamed him if he slept at home. Only his inner principle and military upbringing, his conscience and his judge. It is this military principle, unknown to the Israelis would not allow the will of the king of Uriah. If you say that this is not surprising, such a principle would not only be from the Hittites and the Circassians you would be wrong, because the Jews of this is not known, it is very clear from the biblical story. seems that Uriah repeatedly said senior “Het zhegyIe” – “Be Hett!” – that is, “to multiply the glory of the Hittites!”. And he actually went on and increase in the millennium. Uriah the Hittite – the symbol of this military honor.The honor cost him his life. Uriah name a few times in the history of the Circassians, and probably in the pre-Christian Circassia was quite common. 1. From the ancient inscriptions known – Ware Hetu – full namesake of Uriah the Hittite, of which four thousand years ago wrote an Assyrian king Narasmin. This inscription is carved in stone. Says that of the Western Caucasus thousand years ago came under the leadership of the Hutts Ware Hetu and captured the city of Akkad, and built a city Carchemish and Thapsek. 2. Ueri Dade – the so-called leader Kasogs (ancestors of the Circassians), who fought a duel with the Russian Tmutarakan Prince Mstislav in 1022 in the Russian chronicles the name sounds like – “Rededi.” 3. Ueri Dade – the so-called People’s Court judge, in a story about a wise man Zhabagiev cauldron. Ueri Zhabagiev was the forerunner of the People’s Court. In all cases, except for the story about the judge, the name of Uriah are soldiers – unit commanders. Perhaps this is a military post, or some kind of nickname given to colleagues for military merit, because in Circassian: “Uerra!” – Forward! “Ware” – a war, a war. “Uerubyd” – a prisoner of war. “Uerysh” – Warhorse . “Uerk” – a professional soldier, officer. (The letter “E” in the Circassian language-A short beep) Apparently, the English word – “war” and the Bulgarian – “Thief” – derived from this ancient root .. Wife Uriah the Hittite, which later became the wife of King David and King Solomon’s mother, was called – Bathsheba that twisted like – Bathsheba. “Baie-it-schabe” in the language of the Circassians read: Baie many IT “containing” Schabe, “gentle.” Just-“tender”. As the name for a girl in today’s Circassian world, the name of the organic and reminiscent of the Circassian names such as – NefIytsIe – “black-eyed” Pague – “snub” Naschhue – “gray-eyed”, Schabe – “soft, tender”. The name of her grandfather – Ahithophel. This name contains three Circassian roots: “het” – Hittite, “fe” – appearance, form and “lly” – man. “A” – is common in the Abkhaz-Adyghe language group prefix pointing to a specific object specifying affix. Linguists are trying to translate the name from the Hebrew, the result is – “brother of madness.” Agree, not the most appropriate name for the adviser of King David and indeed the name allogichno for any nation. No single soldier can not have any privileges and benefits, unlike other until the end of the campaign (war, the raid). Other important principles of this Code are as follows: “To leave the battlefield for any reason, except for tactical reasons, leaving the other – means to cover their name and shame their children forever” “The commander elected only during the campaign, and only by their personal qualities.” “Commander leaves last battlefield. ” ‘surrender – the biggest disgrace. ” These principles and requirements remained the Circassians in their military culture until the end of the XIX century. And in the understanding of Uriah – to go to bed with his wife at the time, when his combat comrades in the field, it equates to flee from the battlefield. Such an understanding in principle characteristic of Hittite. The only possible way out for himself, he sees – to spend the night with the same soldiers like himself, to the protection of the palace, with soldiers who are directly in the line of military obyazonnostey. Thus, Uriah creates for himself the situation in which he can consider himself not run away from the battlefield. King David was re-invited me Uriah the next day and “eating with him and drank, and he made ​​him drunk.” King hoped that Uriah drunk certainly will spend the night home to his wife. However, it is not, is not, – sleeps with security at the gate of the palace. Even napivshiysya Uriah did not violate its internal charter. It must be emphasized that no one ever would have blamed him if he slept at home. Only his inner principle and military upbringing, his conscience and his judge. It is this military principle, unknown to the Israelis would not allow the will of the king of Uriah. If you say that this is not surprising, such a principle would not only be from the Hittites and the Circassians you would be wrong, because the Jews of this is not known, it is very clear from the biblical story. seems that Uriah repeatedly said senior “Het zhegyIe” – “Be Hett!” – that is, “to multiply the glory of the Hittites!”. And he actually went on and increase in the millennium. Uriah the Hittite – the symbol of this military honor. The honor cost him his life.Uriah name a few times in the history of the Circassians, and probably in the pre-Christian Circassia was quite common. 1. From the ancient inscriptions known – Ware Hetu – full namesake of Uriah the Hittite, of which four thousand years ago wrote an Assyrian king Narasmin. This inscription is carved in stone. Says that of the Western Caucasus thousand years ago came under the leadership of the Hutts Ware Hetu and captured the city of Akkad, and built a city Carchemish and Thapsek. 2. Ueri Dade – the so-called leader Kasogs (ancestors of the Circassians), who fought a duel with the Russian Tmutarakan Prince Mstislav in 1022 in the Russian chronicles the name sounds like – “Rededi.” 3. Ueri Dade – the so-called People’s Court judge, in a story about a wise man Zhabagiev cauldron. Ueri Zhabagiev was the forerunner of the People’s Court. In all cases, except for the story about the judge, the name of Uriah are soldiers – unit commanders. Perhaps this is a military post, or some kind of nickname given to colleagues for military merit, because in Circassian: “Uerra!” – Forward! “Ware” – a war, a war. “Uerubyd” – a prisoner of war. “Uerysh” – Warhorse . “Uerk” – a professional soldier, officer. (The letter “E” in the Circassian language-A short beep) Apparently, the English word – “war” and the Bulgarian – “Thief” – derived from this ancient root .. Wife Uriah the Hittite, which later became the wife of King David and King Solomon’s mother, was called – Bathsheba that twisted like – Bathsheba.”Baie-it-schabe” in the language of the Circassians read: Baie many IT “containing” Schabe, “gentle.” Just-“tender”. As the name for a girl in today’s Circassian world, the name of the organic and reminiscent of the Circassian names such as – NefIytsIe – “black-eyed” Pague – “snub” Naschhue – “gray-eyed”, Schabe – “soft, tender”. The name of her grandfather – Ahithophel. This name contains three Circassian roots: “het” – Hittite, “fe” – appearance, form and “lly” – man. “A” – is common in the Abkhaz-Adyghe language group prefix pointing to a specific object specifying affix. Linguists are trying to translate the name from the Hebrew, the result is – “brother of madness.” Agree, not the most appropriate name for the adviser of King David and indeed the name allogichno for any nation.
Categories: Кавказ | Leave a comment

Post navigation

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: